Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

Prior to the Title IX thread I never actually realized just how all consuming the femoid obsession with legally being permitted to kill children was. In the thread itself I initially thought I was just reading the ramblings of one or two fringe lunatics but after being directed to the man-hate thread there appears to be virtually no opposition to the notion that being given legal permission to kill children supersedes even the most basic self preservation instincts in femoids.

Is ( thinking about ) killing children the femoid equivalent of cooming? Coomers, in the absence of a healthy, natural sexual development need ever escalating material to satiate their gooning desires. Are femoids with an insatiable bloodlust with regards to children simply gooners, their inability to satiate natural desires twisted and corrupted towards the unnatural? Or is being singularly obsessed with killing children simply the natural state of the femoid, the promise of ever expanding carnage dangled like a carrot by certain political entities to enable their agenda to pass without too many complications?

The natural state of women is that of a small, weak, cowardly, dumb, narcissistic and hateful creatures which can't do much more than pick berries to live off of. The reason men did the majority of the hunting and fighting off predators wasn't because the women were pregnant all the time. There is a bit going around twitter right now asking women if they were alone in the woods if they would prefer to come across a bear or a man. As you can expect from the women of twitter, who are some of the dumbest women out there, the majority always pick the bear. Take a step back and think about that. Women hate men so much they would sooner encounter a large carnivorous predator that kills people to this day over a random man. To tie this back around to children, the desire women have to murder unborn and born children is combination of their natural hate towards men and life itself. They love to murder their children, who love them in a way no other can love them, to simply spite men. Especially when men win custody. Women are the majority of child abusers and child murders (even excluding abortion) for a reason. They hate themselves, their lot in life and they most certainly hate that men who don't hate themselves. And the thing that really pisses them off is the fact that men can recognize they have these feelings.

 

[Justa Grata Honoria]

But it'll keep smashing zoomer pussy until I decide to stop.

We both know you will not stop until the first college aged chick responds to you eww . No worries bud you have good 5-10 years .

If you want to be a whore you don't need to blame millennial women for it . Just say it bruv nobody cares about you being a whore and riding that carousel because its ( D)ifferent for men™. Seen enough of you flaming out and waking up one day wandering where are the young good women at. Its not pretty. But hey thank you for your service without you hogging all the zoomer women i wouldn't have gotten my zoomie zoom zoom boy .

Ps : there is currently a good discussion about mail order brides in why are you single you should get some pointers for the future.

 

[blablabla]

When in Rome.

Lauren Southern is not going to have sex with You Jersh

 

[Spitz]

zoomie zoom zoom

@Null lol broken insert broken site

You got anything that isn't broken?

 

[God of Nothing]

Lauren Southern

literally who?

 

[The Ugly One]

I can't even beginning to comprehend what goes in a woman's mind when it comes to abortion or killing their babies.

It is mortal terror induced by the thought of being held accountable for her own actions.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Lauren Southern is not going to have sex with You Jersh

Unlike you all, I like having a KiwiFarms and do not wish for Jersh to get Mega Herpes and Super Gonorrhea from that slore.

Don't do it Jersh!!! She's not worth it!

 

[Devious Dave]

Is this true or just soy science

 

[smile.jpg]

Is this true or just soy science
View attachment 5937953

Note how it admits the autism rate went up the older both parents were, and that it says absolutely nothing about the age of the mother in that first point. Sure, the autism rate might be higher if the dad is 50+, but what about the mother? Chances are she's also around 50 in those cases. which makes blaming the dad completely fallacious.

Seems to me like "achtually it's your old man seed that's causing autism and women can have nonretarded babies past 30" deflection, but that point about autism going up when there's an age gap is interesting and warrants further investigation.

 

[God of Nothing]

Note how it admits the autism rate went up the older both parents were, and that it says absolutely nothing about the age of the mother in that first point. Sure, the autism rate might be higher if the dad is 50+, but what about the mother? Chances are she's also around 50 in those cases. which makes blaming the dad completely fallacious.

Seems to me like "achtually it's your old man seed that's causing autism and women can have nonretarded babies past 30" deflection, but that point about autism going up when there's an age gap is interesting and warrants further investigation.

older men going for younger women, dude
just ignore that the younger woman consensually fucks the older man

 

[AgendaPoster]

Is this true or just soy science

Largely true and has been allegedly replicated in other study. The reasons are not fully understood, just speculated to be a deterioration in sperm quality or genetic mutations.
There is correlation, but that's about it, and it exists for women too, just less pronounced. Also, risk exists in everything, and all health related risks grow with age, no exceptions.

 

[DOUBLE_WHEEL]

Is this true or just soy science
View attachment 5937953

There's something strange about this study as Israel has results of dropping off instead of rising like every other country tracked which they admit needs further investigation. Maybe Jew sperm degrades slower and countries like Sweden, Denmark and Australia should just stop having any children.

 

[sallowhal]

i'm not a scientist but something tells me autism risks are more baked into environmental factors than just age of the parents. pfas chemicals and microplastics, that kind of stuff. it wasn't uncommon for women to have children until they just couldn't anymore a couple generations ago. why wasn't there a spike in autism then?

anyway, having kids young is the best move imo. had my first one when i was a teenager, don't regret it one bit. it was grounding. my parents had me young (not that young, but my mom was 20 and my dad only a couple years older). i felt bad for my friends that had old ass parents. regardless of retard risk, i feel like i could engage with and understand my kids better since i wasn't four decades older than all of them. still very close to my parents, too. won't have to bury them for a long time, thank god

 

[AgendaPoster]

it wasn't uncommon for women to have children until they just couldn't anymore a couple generations ago. why wasn't there a spike in autism then?

Because we made it up. There were basically no autistic children in the 90s. You were mentally retarded, or oligophrenic, or a similar diagnosis. To make parents feel better about their lower and lower quality offspring grown without grass touching, frail, unable to hit a ball or smash a pussy, we medics made up some more categories and started to give these idiots stims.
Maybe the truth has a bit more nuance than I maliciously stated above, but it's irrelevant. What matters here is that we invented some shit up to alleviate social ostracizing, and normalized another mental deficiency.

 

[The Hardest R]

My scorching hot take is that most autism cases are from parents shoving a screen in front of a kid’s face and letting the TV, iPad, etc. raise the child. Which correlates with older parents because they simply don’t have the energy to play with their kids in their 40s like they would in their 20s.

Note how it admits the autism rate went up the older both parents were, and that it says absolutely nothing about the age of the mother in that first point. Sure, the autism rate might be higher if the dad is 50+, but what about the mother? Chances are she's also around 50 in those cases. which makes blaming the dad completely fallacious.

Seems to me like "achtually it's your old man seed that's causing autism and women can have nonretarded babies past 30" deflection, but that point about autism going up when there's an age gap is interesting and warrants further investigation.

I agree. When it comes to soyence, what they don’t tell you often times tells you more than what they’re telling you.

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

If you want to be a whore you don't need to blame millennial women for it . Just say it bruv nobody cares about you being a whore and riding that carousel because its ( D)ifferent for men™. Seen enough of you flaming out and waking up one day wandering where are the young good women at. Its not pretty. But hey thank you for your service without you hogging all the zoomer women i wouldn't have gotten my zoomie zoom zoom boy .

The absolute seethe from women. You love to see it.

 

[There Is Light At The End]

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

God took Norm to early. I can't blame God for it, I understand, but he took him to early.

 

[bile demon]

i'm not a scientist but something tells me autism risks are more baked into environmental factors

Environmental factors at home:

 

[Feline Supremacist]

When to have children is not a problem when you neck yourself first.