Potential Trump VP pick Gov. Kristi Noem says she shot dead a ‘less than worthless’ dog, ‘disgusting’ goat - >yeah i shoot puppies, cry about it LIBRULS!!!

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

Potential Trump VP pick Gov. Kristi Noem says she shot dead a ‘less than worthless’ dog, ‘disgusting’ goat​

Published April 26, 2024, 2:24 p.m. ET
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, who is widely tipped to be former President Donald Trump’s likely pick as running mate, has admitted shooting dead one of her dogs for being “less than worthless” — and similarly killing a goat she found “disgusting.”


The 52-year-old Republican detailed the killings in an upcoming memoir as proof she is willing to do “difficult, messy and ugly” things when needed, according to the Guardian, which obtained an advance copy.


“Cricket was a wirehair pointer, about 14 months old,” she said of the soon-to-be-shot pup with an “aggressive personality” that made her “untrainable.”
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, who is widely tipped to be former President Donald Trump’s likely pick as running mate, has admitted shooting dead one of her dogs for being “less than worthless” — and similarly killing a goat she found “disgusting.”


The 52-year-old Republican detailed the killings in an upcoming memoir as proof she is willing to do “difficult, messy and ugly” things when needed, according to the Guardian, which obtained an advance copy.


“Cricket was a wirehair pointer, about 14 months old,” she said of the soon-to-be-shot pup with an “aggressive personality” that made her “untrainable.”
Noem took Cricket on a hunt to learn from other dogs — but she instead ruined the hunt by going “out of her mind with excitement” and attacking some chickens like a “trained assassin,” Noem wrote.

When Noem tried to grab the dog, it “whipped around to bite me,” she wrote.
“I hated that dog,” Noem continued, calling Cricket “dangerous to anyone she came in contact with” and “less than worthless … as a hunting dog.”



“At that moment, I realized I had to put her down.”
Noem, who also represented her state in Congress for eight years, explained that she then got her gun and led Cricket to a gravel pit.


“It was not a pleasant job,” she said, “but it had to be done.”


She recalled how her daughter, Kennedy “looked around confused” when she came home from school that day, asking: “Hey, where’s Cricket?”
The report did not say exactly when Cricket was killed. But it was not the only animal the politician writes about shooting dead.


Noem also detailed how she killed a “nasty and mean” male goat because it had not been castrated.


She described the animal as smelling “disgusting, musky, rancid” and claimed it “loved to chase” Noem’s children and knock them down.
The goat was also “dragged to a gravel pit,” but jumped when she pulled the trigger, and subsequently survived the wound. Noem went back to her truck to retrieve another shell, then “hurried back to the gravel pit and put him down,” she wrote.


“I guess if I were a better politician I wouldn’t tell the story here,” she concluded the story.


A construction crew witnessed her kill both animals, she said in the book, “No Going Back: The Truth on What’s Wrong with Politics and How We Move America Forward,” which is due to be published next month.
Noem — whom Trump has said is on his shortlist to run as Vice President — addressed the report Friday while plugging the upcoming book.



“We love animals, but tough decisions like this happen all the time on a farm,” she wrote on X alongside a screenshot of the Guardian article. Sadly, we just had to put down 3 horses a few weeks ago that had been in our family for 25 years.

"If you want more real, honest, and politically INcorrect stories that’ll have the media gasping, preorder ‘No Going Back,'” she wrote along with a link.

 
I could not give less of a shit about this woman larping as some kind of hard-nosed rancher or whatever red meat we are supposed to glean from this. She was a retard before and now she won't be befouling the GOP ticket and that's good.

It's basically this... what she did wasn't all that bad but coming off as smug as she did while doing it is the problem.

Also, figure she'd be one of them faggots that'd sabotage from the inside if she did get in.
 
Not all dogs are Disney characters and dangerous ones need to be put down
Also chickens are good animals, why is no one weeping for the chickens
I eat chicken and don't care if a few are killed.

I like dogs and would happily pet one if they're near me, so I care whether they're mistreated or killed in a shallow grave for treating some chickens like they ain't shit.

The story is really weird since it means the woman was terrible at raising the dog, terrible at handling it misbehaving with walking food, and terrible at resolving the situation as she figured it was better to shoot the dog than just taking it a shelter for someone else to adopt. The woman looks like a jackass no matter which angle you look at the story.
 
Yeah, sometimes an animal is dangerous and the tough thing has to be done and the animal has to be put down.

However you don't fucking brag about it in a god damn tell all book especially when you have the media combing through your trash looking for any reason to smear you. Also just the cold way she describes it. Poor dog didn't deserve a fucking .22 in the skull in the middle of a shitty gravel pit.
 
The idea that power doesn't have to apologize for doing the right thing and making executive judgments doesn't even occur.
On the other hand, do you want someone who divorces themselves from compassion and emotion making hard decisions about sending troops to war, attacking civilians, dropping nukes?

There has to be a line somewhere between "weepy women in power" and emotionless roboPresidents saying "logic dictates it's best for the US interests to bomb the fuck out of enemy cities and kill as many kids as it takes to end the war fast."

At some point you have to consider the impact your policies have on actual human beings. Otherwise we might as well hand our government over to some Great Brain computer from the Golden age of sci-fi to lord it up over us.
 
“Cricket was a wirehair pointer, about 14 months old,” she said of the soon-to-be-shot pup with an “aggressive personality” that made her “untrainable.”
People have rehabilitated abused rottweiler older than that. Just say you're a lazy broad that couldn't be bothered to rehome the poor dog. There's thousands of people who would have loved to have that dog.

I did read the article. Just don't believe her because she's a politician.
 
Last edited:
The left's whole deal is saying it's fine to commit atrocities as long as you feel real bad about them, but that feeling real bad is the important thing. It's the guilt that matters.

If she'd done this but had a whole sob story about how terrible she felt, people would have lapped it up. Same action, different narrative. The left privileges narratives about guilt and that doing what must be done, the heaviness of power, should always be borne with shame and sorrow.

The idea that power doesn't have to apologize for doing the right thing and making executive judgments doesn't even occur.

You have to at least pretend you feel bad, if you want the liberals to go with it.
John Douglas, FBI profiler, draws a distinction between serial killers who feel no remorse and don't have the social awareness to even pretend vs. serial killers who either actually feel bad or who understand that they're supposed to at least make a token display of sympathy for the victims.

Also, as far as we know from the story presented so far, Noem seems to go right from being a bit mad that the dog's not responding to commands to 110% QUARRY EXECUTION. Without even telling the kids ahead of time.

She's presenting herself as a candidate for commander in chief. I feel like as a prospective voter, I'd like to see a couple vaguely halfassed attempts to resolve the problem without a bullet in the head.
 
A politician whose job it is to lie for a living, apropos of nothing, is releasing a book (for actual money) and giving interviews about how she's shoots puppies and animals and retards are taking her word for it that it was totally justified? Guessing some of you bought into the gunt's "kitchen chair" schizo rant.

She may as well have shot herself in that gravel pit because her vp run is joever.
 
This story, and it's response, sum up modern day society pretty well.

A woman kills a vicious, chicken-killing, human-biting animal. It cannot be trained and is best put down. Yet, people cry that "no,no,no you should have spent time, energy and effort to attempt to train this wild mutt to maybe get it somewhat semi-functioning, or sent it to adoption where it would live a horrible, miserable existence".

Maybe, if we were tougher on people and didn't take the "everyone can be saved" approach, we wouldn't live in a pussified, molly-coddled, wild-nigger praising world.
 
This story, and it's response, sum up modern day society pretty well.

A woman kills a vicious, chicken-killing, human-biting animal. It cannot be trained and is best put down. Yet, people cry that "no,no,no you should have spent time, energy and effort to attempt to train this wild mutt to maybe get it somewhat semi-functioning, or sent it to adoption where it would live a horrible, miserable existence".

Maybe, if we were tougher on people and didn't take the "everyone can be saved" approach, we wouldn't live in a pussified, molly-coddled, wild-nigger praising world.
By and large, people who need for killin' are not cute, know what they did (morally) wrong, can't be trained, and don't have anyone willing to adopt them and take responsibility for their future actions. Apples to oranges.
 
This story, and it's response, sum up modern day society pretty well.

A woman kills a vicious, chicken-killing, human-biting animal. It cannot be trained and is best put down. Yet, people cry that "no,no,no you should have spent time, energy and effort to attempt to train this wild mutt to maybe get it somewhat semi-functioning, or sent it to adoption where it would live a horrible, miserable existence".

Maybe, if we were tougher on people and didn't take the "everyone can be saved" approach, we wouldn't live in a pussified, molly-coddled, wild-nigger praising world.
1) People are incredibly irrational when it comes to animals
2) This is a gold mine of a story for liberals to attack her and the right

If what she says its true, only an idiot would be upset she put down a dangerous dog. Attacking livestock is bad enough, but people? We should have zero tolerance for dogs that do that. Maybe if it was a pitbull people would be clapping like seals.
 
Only a fucking maniac brags in writing about blowing the family pet's brains out in a gravel pit.

Even if she was convinced the dog was dangerous, humane euthanasia exists for a good reason.
Yeah and you know how much that shit costs?
A 12 gauge has been used to put down animals for generations out on the farms. Its quick and its efficient and it doesnt leave them in pain for longer than a split second if done right.
You want to talk about cruel shit done to animals I knew an old dude that threw burlap sacks of kittens into the river unironically rather than get his mice hunters spayed/neutered.
I will admit bragging about it is fucking weird though. Lady, you didn't do anything worth of note one way or the other, you did a chore. Did you write about all the time you did the laundry too?
 
Last edited:
I will admit bragging about it is fucking weird though. Lady, you didn't do anything worth of note one way or the other, you did a chore. Did you write about all the time you did the laundry too?
Not only did she brag about it she bragged about needing to take a second shot because she fucked up with the first round.
 
Back