Wealthy white Louisiana residents win right to form their own city and split from poorer black neighborhoods in landmark court ruling after a 10-year - Critics of the new city say the plan is 'racist' and will create a 'white enclave'


Wealthy white Louisiana residents win right to form their own city and split from poorer black neighborhoods in landmark court ruling after a 10-year battle​

  • St George will have 86,000 residents across a 60-square-mile area
  • Critics of the new city say the plan is 'racist' and will create a 'white enclave'
  • Baton Rouge residents fear move will be economically devastating for their city
Wealthy white Baton Rouge residents have won a decade-long court battle to split from poorer neighborhoods and form their own city with plans for better schools and less crime.

The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the new City of St George could move forward with incorporation, splitting off from the rest of Baton Rouge.

St George will have 86,000 residents across a 60-square-mile area in the southeast of East Baton Rouge Parish and will have its own Mayor and city council.

Supporters of the new city say that the existing city-parish government is poorly run, with high crime rates and bad schools.

Opponents say the movement is 'racist' and will create a 'white enclave' as it separates a wealthy area of the city from the majority Black city and school district.

Leader of an anti-St George campaign group, M.E. Cormier, told the New York Times: 'There is no basis in fact that the existence of St. George is positive or will bring positivity or have a positive impact on any areas of the cities or the parish.'
Plans for St George started nearly 15 years ago when residents decided they would like to start their own school district.

Their plans then grew more ambitious and in 2015 they drew up a proposal to create their own city.

The proposal didn't get enough votes and the movement ground to a halt until 2019, when a second ballot to incorporate St George passed, with 54 percent of residents voting in favor of separation.

A lengthy court battle followed, with Mayor-President Sharon Weston Broome and Mayor Pro Tem Lamont Cole suing St. George organizers soon after the election.

They argued that St George would siphon over $48 million in annual tax revenue from the city-parish government with serious knock-on effects for local services and staff.

They claimed that the loss in revenue would mean services would have to be cut and employees laid off and that St George's proposed internal budget was inaccurate and that they would not be able to be self-sufficient.

Lower courts in Louisiana supported Baton Rouge's arguments, and shot down the proposed new city.

But now the state's Supreme Court has overruled their decisions, saying that the internal budget is balanced and will be able to provide public services, meaning St George can incorporate.

Critics of the St. George proposal argue that it would create a poor, black, and urban Baton Rouge and a wealthy, white, and suburban St. George.

Posting on Facebook, resident Sarah Stelly wrote: 'St George reeks of class division, it's quickly becoming the new worst type of bigotry.'

Another resident, Paul Brady, wrote: 'The segregationist won. I'm no longer a citizen of Baton Rouge. I now live in the white enclave of St George.'

Leader of an anti-St George campaign group, M.E. Cormier, told the New York Times: 'There is no basis in fact that the existence of St. George is positive or will bring positivity or have a positive impact on any areas of the cities or the parish.

'The detanglement, logistically speaking, is going to be an absolute nightmare.'

But Andrew Murrell, a leader of the St George project, told the paper: 'This is the culmination of citizens exercising their constitutional rights.

'Now we begin the process of delivering on our promises of a better city.'

Fellow campaign leader, Norman Browning told The Times: 'I look forward to our ability to build an efficient, productive and vibrant city while contributing to a thriving East Baton Rouge Parish.'

The split campaign emerged out of the ashes of a failed campaign to create a new school district by the wealthy, predominantly white residents of southern Baton Rouge
A 2014 study by the Baton Rouge Area Chamber found that the effects of the partition would be economically devastating for the remainder of Baton Rouge, immediately creating a $53 million budget shortfall.

The study also raised concerns as to whether the remaining portions of Baton Rouge, Louisiana’s state capital, would be able to support public services despite the loss of tax revenue.

As the tables below shows projected figures for St. George would create a town with an average income $30,000 higher than present day Baton Rouge, while the unemployment rate would be halved.

According to figures compiled by the Baton Rouge Area Chamber, the new town would have a majority white population, as opposed to Baton Rouge which has a black majority and the number of people receiving food stamps would also be more than halved.
 
In new kike neighborhoods, the ones ShitRock/Berkshire KikeAway own - they get Whites in then build shitty commie-bloc style apartments right in the middle of that White neighborhood. And guess what class of monkey are put into those apartments? It's all about niggering White neighborhoods from the inside out. Iudea Delenda Est.
 
If the whites go off and form their own city you're now a 100% diverse paradise free from racism.
Eh looks like it's 70% white and a (seemingly sustainable) 12% black. Vs. the overall city at 55 black / 35 white, meaning St. George's residents would never have been represented in local politics again.

Funny how they frame it as the "wealthy" residents, then note the 30k higher average income (almost certainly household rather than individual, and therefore exaggerated by the intact two-earner families vs. widespread single motherhood).

Baton Rouge's average income is 50k which is hardly poverty, and that makes St. George's 80k which is hardly wealthy. It means the former has a huge government middle class paid for by the latter who are slightly higher middle class professionals (or employ raycist strategies like marriage).
 
Eh looks like it's 70% white and a (seemingly sustainable) 12% black. Vs. the overall city at 55 black / 35 white, meaning St. George's residents would never have been represented in local politics again.

Funny how they frame it as the "wealthy" residents, then note the 30k higher average income (almost certainly household rather than individual, and therefore exaggerated by the intact two-earner families vs. widespread single motherhood).

Baton Rouge's average income is 50k which is hardly poverty, and that makes St. George's 80k which is hardly wealthy. It means the former has a huge government middle class paid for by the latter who are slightly higher middle class professionals (or employ raycist strategies like staying married).
Genuine question, does that 50k include welfare recipients?

I have no skin in this game as I hate the state of Louisiana more than any race, but I would imagine there's a non insubstantial amount of welfare recipients.
 
Eh looks like it's 70% white and a (seemingly sustainable) 12% black. Vs. the overall city at 55 black / 35 white, meaning St. George's residents would never have been represented in local politics again.

Funny how they frame it as the "wealthy" residents, then note the 30k higher average income (almost certainly household rather than individual, and therefore exaggerated by the intact two-earner families vs. widespread single motherhood).

Baton Rouge's average income is 50k which is hardly poverty, and that makes St. George's 80k which is hardly wealthy. It means the former has a huge government middle class paid for by the latter who are slightly higher middle class professionals (or employ raycist strategies like marriage).
Yes. I have been in "St. George", it's solidly middle-class, upper-middle class at best. "Wealthy white people" is just reporter-speak for "people who contribute to the tax base rather than enjoying the benefits".
 
I find this especially hilarious considering they said “We want to start our own city without the abundance of impoverished areas that aren’t improving, the poor schooling system and the crime.”

and the fucking black people said “Sounds like you wanna kick out the black people!”

I wouldn’t think that low of african americans but apparently african americans and white liberals will. Pretty fucking gross.

These people was kangs and I believe this is an inherited kangdom for which they can prosper like they did upon the Nile.
 
They argued that St George would siphon over $48 million in annual tax revenue from the city-parish government with serious knock-on effects for local services and staff.
I guess you niggers ought to start paying taxes eh? Stinks to stink.
They claimed that the loss in revenue would mean services would have to be cut and employees laid off and that St George's proposed internal budget was inaccurate and that they would not be able to be self-sufficient.
Police defunded sounds like a win for them.
 
Yes. I have been in "St. George", it's solidly middle-class, upper-middle class at best. "Wealthy white people" is just reporter-speak for "people who contribute to the tax base rather than enjoying the benefits".
Paying taxes for welfare is white-adjunct. I feared this could happen after "defund the police" became a racial thorn since George Floyd. If there's a trend, well...
 
Back