Culture Only 32 of the Top Movies in the Last Decade Say Climate Change Exists — Study

Source: IndieWire (archive)

Last month, non-profit group Good Energy launched what it called a Bechdel Test for Climate Change, a simple set of criteria designed to determine if it was clear climate change was present in a film. The real Allison Bechdel even endorsed it.

Good Energy, in launching its “Climate Reality Check,” said just three movies nominated for Oscars this year passed the test’s two simple rules: “Climate change exists” and “a character knows it.” Now in a more extensive study, the group analyzed 250 of the top grossing movies between 2013 and 2022.

Global warming has been with us for a while now, but only 12.8 percent — 32 of the 250 films studied in that time span — even passed the first criteria saying that climate change exists. Only 24 films, or 9.6 percent, passed both criteria of the test.

Good Energy and researchers at Colby College’s Buck Lab for Climate and Environment picked 25 films from each year between 2013 and 2022, looking at the total number of IMDB ratings to determine the most popular. They only looked at fictional films, not documentaries, and they filtered out any that weren’t set in the modern day or the near future, which includes films set after the year 2006, before the year 2100, and ones that are actually set on Earth. So no, Westerns, period pieces, and intergalactic sci-fis are excluded from needing characters to be aware of climate change.

Even a passing mention of terms like “climate change,” “global warming,” “the climate crisis,” or other environmental phrases were enough to qualify for inclusion, and not many cleared even that bar. The report mentions a conversation between Batman and Aquaman in “Justice League” in which Batman mentions “melting the polar ice caps” and “destroying the ecosystem.” In “Triangle of Sadness,” a climate mention isn’t even spoken, but it’s mentioned on an LED billboard when it reads: “THERE IS A NEW CLIMATE ENTERING THE WORLD…OF FASHION.”

In fact, only six of the 32 movies had three or more scenes in which climate change was mentioned.

Here are all the films, by year, that passed the Climate Bechdel Test:

  • 2013: “Pacific Rim”
  • 2014: “Kingsman: The Secret Service,” “The Amazing Spider-Man 2”
  • 2015: “Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials,” “Fantastic Four”
  • 2017: “Justice League,” “Happy Death Day”
  • 2018: “Venom,” “Aquaman”
  • 2019: “Midsommar,” “Marriage Story,” “Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw,” “Pokemon: Detective Pikachu”
  • 2020: “Tenet,” “The Hunt”
  • 2021: “Don’t Look Up,” “Zack Snyder’s Justice League,” “Eternals,” “Godzilla vs. Kong,” “The Tomorrow War,” “Wrath of Man”
  • 2022: “Glass Onion,” “Jurassic World Dominion,” “Triangle of Sadness”
The good news is that more movies over the last five years mentioned climate change than those released in the first half of the 2010s, and awareness in major films is rising.

“We turn to stories to find meaning, joy, beauty, and courage — and we desperately need to see our world reflected in the movies that we watch and love. For all of us, that world now includes the climate crisis,” Good Energy founder Anna Jane Joyner said in a statement. “Like the legendary Bechdel Test before it, the Climate Reality Check is designed to serve as both a creative tool and an invitation to investigate the presence of climate representation on-screen.”

Joyner says the data suggests films that pass the Climate Reality Check are more profitable than those that don’t, and Good Energy would like to see 50 percent of contemporary films pass the test by 2027.

“At this crucial moment in which the future of everything we love is at stake, storytelling can be a climate solution. But it can also obscure the reality of the situation we’re in,” said Matthew Schneider-Mayerson, PhD, associate professor of English and environmental studies at Colby College. “There’s a desperate need for studios, filmmakers, and writers to provide narratives that speak to our climate reality.”

Read the full report via Good Energy's website here.
 
I'll never understand why television or movies have to preach to us. Like I miss being a kid sitting cross-legged enjoying a movie on its own merits than whether it portrays colored characters the correct way, or this about climate change.

For example, the movie Orphan faced "controversy" because the villain was an adult who posed as a child and attempted to kill her foster family. Foster care groups took it personal that it portrayed the foster care system as bad but I doubt anyone watching would see it as a real reflection of real-world foster care.
 
I'll never understand why television or movies have to preach to us. Like I miss being a kid sitting cross-legged enjoying a movie on its own merits than whether it portrays colored characters the correct way, or this about climate change.

For example, the movie Orphan faced "controversy" because the villain was an adult who posed as a child and attempted to kill her foster family. Foster care groups took it personal that it portrayed the foster care system as bad but I doubt anyone watching would see it as a real reflection of real-world foster care.
1) Every opportunity to talk about your pet issue (and make people engage with it) is taken by activists.

2) The left actually believes it can program culture through pop culture. It's why they get so upset when something they don't like gets created and is popular.
 
Global warming has been with us for a while now, but only 12.8 percent — 32 of the 250 films studied in that time span
In the 70s they were running news stories about an impending ice age and global cooling.

Now it's "global warming has been with us for a while now".

Ecotards are all in on the grift and it is right and just to hope they die.
 
Yes because I know when I pay $8 for crappy movie tickets and $12 for popcorn the thing I'm really there to see is some preachy fucking nonsense about climate change. That is truly the only thing I look for when judging the merits of a movie.


Joyless fuckers have to put that shit in everything and wonder why attendance is in freefall.
 
2014: “Kingsman: The Secret Service,” “The Amazing Spider-Man 2”
In Kingsman at least it’s mentioned either by the sociopathic villain as to why he’s planning on killing 90% of the worlds population, or by somebody trying to ingratiate themselves with said villain as a ruse. Hardly serious.
 
Ugh, the awareness of heavy commercial vs light commercial vs retail zoning is at an all-time low in today's youth and no one wants to touch on that in movies and entertainment. Lobbyists and special interest groups from all sides have the directors hamstrung.

The way this works in my area (very likely yours too!) I could seriously wake up one morning to find my panera bread replaced by an AR-15 factory, wtf?
 
I'll never understand why television or movies have to preach to us. Like I miss being a kid sitting cross-legged enjoying a movie on its own merits than whether it portrays colored characters the correct way, or this about climate change.

For example, the movie Orphan faced "controversy" because the villain was an adult who posed as a child and attempted to kill her foster family. Foster care groups took it personal that it portrayed the foster care system as bad but I doubt anyone watching would see it as a real reflection of real-world foster care.
Herbert Marcuse opined that it's not "true art" unless it serves the progressive agenda.
 
People wonder why I actively cheer for the downfall of Hollywood, the video games industry, and the tech industry. Preachy fuckin bullshit is why and the kikes in charge going broke is all that’s going to change it.

Music isn’t so bad now that it’s easier than ever to be independent but Hollywood and video games really need to crumble. The only way to make that happen is to actively not participate in it.

When’s the last time you watched a new movie or played a AAA game? Are you part of the problem?
 
Back