Wealthy white Louisiana residents win right to form their own city and split from poorer black neighborhoods in landmark court ruling after a 10-year - Critics of the new city say the plan is 'racist' and will create a 'white enclave'


Wealthy white Louisiana residents win right to form their own city and split from poorer black neighborhoods in landmark court ruling after a 10-year battle​

  • St George will have 86,000 residents across a 60-square-mile area
  • Critics of the new city say the plan is 'racist' and will create a 'white enclave'
  • Baton Rouge residents fear move will be economically devastating for their city
Wealthy white Baton Rouge residents have won a decade-long court battle to split from poorer neighborhoods and form their own city with plans for better schools and less crime.

The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the new City of St George could move forward with incorporation, splitting off from the rest of Baton Rouge.

St George will have 86,000 residents across a 60-square-mile area in the southeast of East Baton Rouge Parish and will have its own Mayor and city council.

Supporters of the new city say that the existing city-parish government is poorly run, with high crime rates and bad schools.

Opponents say the movement is 'racist' and will create a 'white enclave' as it separates a wealthy area of the city from the majority Black city and school district.

Leader of an anti-St George campaign group, M.E. Cormier, told the New York Times: 'There is no basis in fact that the existence of St. George is positive or will bring positivity or have a positive impact on any areas of the cities or the parish.'
Plans for St George started nearly 15 years ago when residents decided they would like to start their own school district.

Their plans then grew more ambitious and in 2015 they drew up a proposal to create their own city.

The proposal didn't get enough votes and the movement ground to a halt until 2019, when a second ballot to incorporate St George passed, with 54 percent of residents voting in favor of separation.

A lengthy court battle followed, with Mayor-President Sharon Weston Broome and Mayor Pro Tem Lamont Cole suing St. George organizers soon after the election.

They argued that St George would siphon over $48 million in annual tax revenue from the city-parish government with serious knock-on effects for local services and staff.

They claimed that the loss in revenue would mean services would have to be cut and employees laid off and that St George's proposed internal budget was inaccurate and that they would not be able to be self-sufficient.

Lower courts in Louisiana supported Baton Rouge's arguments, and shot down the proposed new city.

But now the state's Supreme Court has overruled their decisions, saying that the internal budget is balanced and will be able to provide public services, meaning St George can incorporate.

Critics of the St. George proposal argue that it would create a poor, black, and urban Baton Rouge and a wealthy, white, and suburban St. George.

Posting on Facebook, resident Sarah Stelly wrote: 'St George reeks of class division, it's quickly becoming the new worst type of bigotry.'

Another resident, Paul Brady, wrote: 'The segregationist won. I'm no longer a citizen of Baton Rouge. I now live in the white enclave of St George.'

Leader of an anti-St George campaign group, M.E. Cormier, told the New York Times: 'There is no basis in fact that the existence of St. George is positive or will bring positivity or have a positive impact on any areas of the cities or the parish.

'The detanglement, logistically speaking, is going to be an absolute nightmare.'

But Andrew Murrell, a leader of the St George project, told the paper: 'This is the culmination of citizens exercising their constitutional rights.

'Now we begin the process of delivering on our promises of a better city.'

Fellow campaign leader, Norman Browning told The Times: 'I look forward to our ability to build an efficient, productive and vibrant city while contributing to a thriving East Baton Rouge Parish.'

The split campaign emerged out of the ashes of a failed campaign to create a new school district by the wealthy, predominantly white residents of southern Baton Rouge
A 2014 study by the Baton Rouge Area Chamber found that the effects of the partition would be economically devastating for the remainder of Baton Rouge, immediately creating a $53 million budget shortfall.

The study also raised concerns as to whether the remaining portions of Baton Rouge, Louisiana’s state capital, would be able to support public services despite the loss of tax revenue.

As the tables below shows projected figures for St. George would create a town with an average income $30,000 higher than present day Baton Rouge, while the unemployment rate would be halved.

According to figures compiled by the Baton Rouge Area Chamber, the new town would have a majority white population, as opposed to Baton Rouge which has a black majority and the number of people receiving food stamps would also be more than halved.
 
Crime stats comparing Baton Rouge to St. George are going to be hilarious.
"SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS!"

As long as St. George doesn't ban people from living there just because of their skin color, etc. it's their business.
I have a feeling the place will be flooded with non whites in a couple of decades, it will start with moving in more upwardly mobile blacks and eventually there will be bills passed to contruct section 8 housing and the place will go to shit. Having safe, affulent white enclaves just won't be allowed.
 
"SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS!"


I have a feeling the place will be flooded with non whites in a couple of decades, it will start with moving in more upwardly mobile blacks and eventually there will be bills passed to contruct section 8 housing and the place will go to shit. Having safe, affulent white enclaves just won't be allowed.
Segregation was self-defense. It's hard to believe they were ever able to sell the lie that Whites defending themselves was the evil act, and not the widespread ethnic cleansing that drove the necessity for such self-defense.
 
I don't understand how it took so long if the idea is so popular. Why would this even be left up to courts in the first place?

This could be a strategy for dealing with the urban/suburban/city problem as cities get worse and worse. Break off the sane productive parts bit by bit.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Terfmaster9000
I don't understand how it took so long if the idea is so popular. Why would this even be left up to courts in the first place?

This could be a strategy for dealing with the urban/suburban/city problem as cities get worse and worse. Break off the sane productive parts bit by bit.
Again, the craziest part was that St. George was never part of the city. If the city wanted to incorporate those suburbs they should've done it years ago, but that would upset the power structure in the city.

They basically wanted taxation without representation, and their crying only shows who really subsidizes who.
 
Now just imagine what if the hispanic parts of Chicago wanted to split from the city to create their own city just to annoy we know who?
 
Well, that depends on what was the factor that made this - was it truly "raycis" for starters?
And if so, if it was, it won't be long until jews move in and history repeats itself.
 
If they try to make the neighborhood better its gentrification, if they leave it's white flight. You can't win.
The parts of the city parish(it's not part of Baton Rouge proper legally speaking) that are looking to incorporate into a new city are the parts of the city parish you'd actually want to go to. There are other parts around LSU (south side, not north side) and over by the river south of the campus that are okay, but everywhere else isn't anywhere you'd want to be caught out in. If half of the parish wants to break off and do their own thing then let them.
 
Well, that depends on what was the factor that made this - was it truly "raycis" for starters?
And if so, if it was, it won't be long until jews move in and history repeats itself.

According to the usual suspects, it's racist to want the tax dollars that are taken from you to go to law enforcement that will actually do their jobs, good schools that will actually teach children, and a city government that will actually represent their constituents.
 
100 years from now, Louisiana will be the last bastion of white people, surrounded by states of BIPOCs (read, "1.5% indigenous people, latinos, and black"blooded" white faggots) who will randomly attack it with 50yr old outdated missiles and yell "genocide" when Louisiana retaliates and bombs delivered from New India (India and China, now joined as a global superpower)

Anyway my point is, invest in Amazon Gift Cards
 
I don't understand how it took so long if the idea is so popular. Why would this even be left up to courts in the first place?

This could be a strategy for dealing with the urban/suburban/city problem as cities get worse and worse. Break off the sane productive parts bit by bit.
I don't think it matters where you go, as every state is different in their own way; but property rights can be really fucking messy, especially if anyone drops a hint at anything is rayciss. Much like how the Civil Rights Act did shit like make "education" a human right and force non-compatibles to co-mingle, the Fair Housing Act pretty much did the same thing when it comes to property. But when you take municipal, county, and state, lines into effect, a lot of people have a lot of say, regardless of how popular something is. My hometown actually filed an official petition/letter of grievance/whatever, declaring their desire to leave the State of California and either join Arizona or Nevada; but even though the state neglects the area, you need both states to be in agreement and pretty much have Congressional approval to remap the state boundaries, shocker, it went nowhere, despite it being very popular with the local populace. Shit sounds easy on paper, but going through the proper channels means you either need to bribe people, or start killing people.

Well, that depends on what was the factor that made this - was it truly "raycis" for starters?
And if so, if it was, it won't be long until jews move in and history repeats itself.
It's against the Realtor Code of Ethics induce a panic sell by going to homeowners and saying something like; "THOSE PEOPLE seem to moving in to your neighborhood, and you don't want to be around THOSE PEOPLE now do you?" Just as if a darkie says he wants to look at a house in a certain neighborhood, it's not your place to try and steer him away. Even if there's no way in hell they could afford it, if you're not careful about how you say things and racism can be considered (and it will be). To unironically quote Anita; "Everything is racist."
 
"SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS!"


I have a feeling the place will be flooded with non whites in a couple of decades, it will start with moving in more upwardly mobile blacks and eventually there will be bills passed to contruct section 8 housing and the place will go to shit. Having safe, affulent white enclaves just won't be allowed.
What kind of non-whites, may I ask?

The wealthiest neighborhoods in my city are primarily inhabited by Indian and Pakistani physicians, who are also non-white.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: niaff
Back