I've already expressed an "okay there's no proof that he did", can I at least get a bit of credit that I'm not going to continue that rumor if I see that he's clearly denied it?
No, you don't. Because a denial should have absolutely no bearing of the believability of claims that are not properly sourced or evidenced. To say "well I'll keep saying it if he doesn't deny it to my satisfaction" is fucking gay. That is Nick-tier dogshit.
This is Kiwifarms. Lolcows deny shit referenced here all the time. A denial, in and off itself, generally doesn't count for much. You've been here since 2019. You ought to know this.
What helps Monty a
great deal here (and indeed has engendered him quite a bit of sympathy) isn't that he's denied or not denied anything, but that there is not a single scintilla of credible evidence...
NOT ONE... that he is a pedophile. Certainly there is no proof he is a child molester.
Monty does not owe you, I, or Nick a denial. Leaving that aside though, he pretty clearly presents a blanket denial by way of his lawsuit.
Also, since I'm now fired up about this, I would like to point out the OP is chock full of things since proven to be incorrect. I don't think
@5t3n0g0ph3r is coming back. I would like to see some corrections made. I would even volunteer to make them myself if need be.
---
Examples:
The 4-part series of films features, Quest "explores the mind of a serial killer" with the victim being a young girl wearing a pig mask.
Young woman. That is NOT a young girl by any stretch of the imagination.
@Harm also
pointed out in this post why the character is almost certainly meant to be an adult.
The series has been thoroughly scrubbed off the internet with a Retmeishka blog post claiming the girl featured in the short films really did die.
3 of the 4 parts have been recovered. Montegraph claims he never uploaded the fourth.
The film is not nearly as salacious as Monty's trolls made out. Or to quote Null, this not "some A Serbian Film level shit." The film is best described as "stupid." It's not even graphic.
Null described the Retmeishka blog as "unhinged and unreliable."
He is correct. I get that this isn't a scholarly website, but why is this even here? It's the equivalent of saying that a meth addict living under a freeway overpass claims that Monty killed a hooker behind an Arby's outside Kansas City back in 1987.
Last I checked snuff films are still a thing of urban legend.
(Incidentally, it's weird to me that we're supposed to believe that the girl is dead, but I guess ignore the claim in the same blog that the girl is 35).
As noted in a phone call with @Null featured on Mad At The Internet, Quest claims that he had parental consent to take nudes of minors as part of his business. Needless to say this has led detractors to call him a pedophile.
I do not believe this is true. It is incongruous with what Null wrote in Montegraph's thread. It is my understanding that that claim did
not originate from Montegraph, but somewhere else.
Everything came to a head when Quest decided to sue Rekieta and serviced him on December 5, 2022.
What happened is that Rekieta demanded Monty sue him.
And then, ya know, he did.
Since then Nick has had to pay tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of dollars to Randazza so he can avoid being wrong. Money he doesn't have a prayer of ever seeing again.
That's a
big part of why this lawsuit is so damn funny.
