Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Mr. Automanic seems to have joined r/fuckcars...
PatrickHatesCars1.jpgPatrickHatesCars2.jpgPatrickHatesCars3.jpgPatrickHatesCars4.jpgPatrickHatesCars5.jpg

Cars bad, roads bad, bridges bad, EVs bad, parking lots bad, low density areas bad, freedom of movement bad.
Buses good, high density bughives good, V6 Rustangs double good.
 
Mr. Automanic seems to have joined r/fuckcars...
View attachment 5975098View attachment 5975099View attachment 5975100View attachment 5975101View attachment 5975102

Cars bad, roads bad, bridges bad, EVs bad, parking lots bad, low density areas bad, freedom of movement bad.
Buses good, high density bughives good, V6 Rustangs double good.
Not one selfie of him using public transportation in his vibrant Milwaukee ghetto that’s no doubt lined with bus stops. Much hand wringing and finger wagging over those who can afford a nicer lifestyle than his own. What’s with the obsession with packing as many people into an area as possible? Is it jealousy that he can’t afford a home with a lawn?
 
Last edited:
Cars bad, roads bad, bridges bad, EVs bad, parking lots bad, low density areas bad, freedom of movement bad.
Buses good, high density bughives good, V6 Rustangs double good.
But a jobless drunken fuckup should obviously have a Rustang, not some pleb doing some "work" thing.
 
Mr. Automanic seems to have joined r/fuckcars...
View attachment 5975098View attachment 5975099View attachment 5975100View attachment 5975101View attachment 5975102

Cars bad, roads bad, bridges bad, EVs bad, parking lots bad, low density areas bad, freedom of movement bad.
Buses good, high density bughives good, V6 Rustangs double good.
>It pains me to say it, but the idea that we need the "freedom" to jump in multi-ton machines carrying one or two people in the most space, energy, and cash inefficient way has to die.

He should move to Southeast Asia. Not only do they not have freedom, they don't even need multi-ton machines to haul pigs like him around.
pig hauled by moped.PNG
 
>It pains me to say it, but the idea that we need the "freedom" to jump in multi-ton machines carrying one or two people in the most space, energy, and cash inefficient way has to die.

He should move to Southeast Asia. Not only do they not have freedom, they don't even need multi-ton machines to haul pigs like him around.
View attachment 5975158

Can someone photoshop that to be Fatrick on the moped and the cage full of black children?
 
Mr. Automanic seems to have joined r/fuckcars...
View attachment 5975098View attachment 5975099View attachment 5975100View attachment 5975101View attachment 5975102

Cars bad, roads bad, bridges bad, EVs bad, parking lots bad, low density areas bad, freedom of movement bad.
Buses good, high density bughives good, V6 Rustangs double good.
I love that he's so dumb and tone death he can't even pretend the mass transit system is for anyone but the plebs, that HE is not apart of.

I can't help but think about that quote about temporarily embarrassed millionaires whenever people talk about restrictions for the environment. As most of the time the people calling for the restrictions can easily be called temporarily embarrassed elites, utterly unaware that after they get their wish they'll find themselves on the subway sitting next to Jamal as he and his baby mama yell at each other over a speaker call.

Also side note: but hasn't it been proven that high population density areas are actually less efficient energy wise?
 
Mr. Automanic seems to have joined r/fuckcars...
View attachment 5975098View attachment 5975099View attachment 5975100View attachment 5975101View attachment 5975102

Cars bad, roads bad, bridges bad, EVs bad, parking lots bad, low density areas bad, freedom of movement bad.
Buses good, high density bughives good, V6 Rustangs double good.
What a fat retard. So EVs have to magically work off all their production cost to be "carbon neutral", but we'll say nothing about the cost of manufacturing shit like trains and buses? He talks about all the necessary car infrastructure like roads and bridges, while ignoring that the public transport he's arguing for needs it just as much if not more (building bridges that can take the weight of shit like buses and trains is much harder than one designed for cars).

He's also still pushing the retarded EVs are so heavy myth. I pointed out last time he was oinking about this, but the average EV is maybe 15-20% heavier than a similar ICE vehicle. They also don't wear out shit like brakes/tires faster because they use regenerative braking. I can't find it now but I'm pretty sure someone like the RAC or AA did a study with some local transport companies that massive fleets of both ICE and EVs, and most if not all reported that the ICE equivalents were just as bad if not worse for wear and tear.

Also again talking about the weight of EVS damaging roads. You know what weighs more than an EV? A bus full of people you fat fuck. Where I just moved to there's a road that goes into the city centre that a few years ago they turned one of the lanes into a fulltime bus lane, and then a bunch of the bus companies rerouted that way because it's actually quicker to go slightly round the city centre and use the bus lanes rather than fight normal traffic on the other roads. However the funny thing is that side of the road is now noticeably way more fucked up with cracks in the asphalt and shit, especially where the bust stops are.
 
Not one selfie of him using public transportation in his vibrant Milwaukee ghetto that’s no doubt lined with bus stops.
I can’t imagine a more dangerous place for black children to be than on a bus with Patrick. Please don’t give him this idea.
they'll find themselves on the subway sitting next to Jamal as he and his baby mama yell at each other over a speaker call.
I’m less worried about Jamal having his argument with his baby momma (always bring headphones) than I am him getting together with his friends and trying to show off how tough he is. I’ve seen some shit on the DC metro before, and it was always the most dangerous when they were joined by their pack.
and most if not all reported that the ICE equivalents were just as bad if not worse for wear and tear.
I’m still not getting an EV.
So EVs have to magically work off all their production cost to be "carbon neutral",
Yes, child.
 
Also side note: but hasn't it been proven that high population density areas are actually less efficient energy wise?
It really depends on what answer you want, and how you frame it (and really comes down to how you calculate externalities).

The land has a certain carrying capacity, and once you exceed that all sorts of things become issues. A single house on five acres (or even an acre in many places) can survive on well water and septic; once you get denser you need town wells and town sewer systems (even if it's just draining to a larger septic somewhere else). And very high densities, you need massive public works departments just to handle water and sewage.

NYC water board: 4.4 billion. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/nycwater..._and_reports/wb-financial-statements-2023.pdf

It's how you can take a piss and a shit in a 40 acre wood and not cause an issue, but if you have fifty people a day shitting in an acre it's going to be a shithole quite quickly.

Usually when it gets down to it, less dense areas are cheaper overall, but higher density areas can be "less carbon intensive" or some bullshit.
 
>It pains me to say it, but the idea that we need the "freedom" to jump in multi-ton machines carrying one or two people in the most space, energy, and cash inefficient way has to die.

He should move to Southeast Asia. Not only do they not have freedom, they don't even need multi-ton machines to haul pigs like him around.
View attachment 5975158
Yes, those are pretty good advantages. Disadvantages include lack of proper pepperoni materials, housing meant for midgets, a linguistic barrier to render his childing useless, and for the mortal blow to Fatrick's pride, a culture with no appreciation or use for Xitter or left-wing activism.
 
Pat hates Elon so much he has become r/fuckcars

Also side note: but hasn't it been proven that high population density areas are actually less efficient energy wise?
Once you get to the point where most people are living in high rises and there's organic demand for mass transportation that's pretty much impossible to be less efficient. Smaller apartments mean less air conditioning energy consumption, the infrastructure costs of rail are huge but if it's used by many the cost per person is low, etc.

The problem is that most of the United States is not dense at all. If some shithole like Milwaukee built commuter rail nobody would use it and the cost of building the rail would be huge also. You can't just take a spread out city that was built around the premise that people would use cars and magically make it dense.
 
Mr. Automanic seems to have joined r/fuckcars...
View attachment 5975098View attachment 5975099View attachment 5975100View attachment 5975101View attachment 5975102

Cars bad, roads bad, bridges bad, EVs bad, parking lots bad, low density areas bad, freedom of movement bad.
Buses good, high density bughives good, V6 Rustangs double good.
Sounds like the one idiot Liberal, Steven Guilbeault who doesn't want new roads built because "climate change" and wants to ban wood pizza ovens because "climate change". People like this have never taken a science course in their lives and don't know what they're talking about. Just more evidence that Patrick has never been conservative.



Batteries’ bigger impact​

Despite the environmental footprint of manufacturing lithium-ion batteries, this technology is much more climate-friendly than the alternatives, Shao-Horn says.

In the United States, the electric grid (which is a mix of fossil fuels and low-carbon energy such as wind, solar, hydropower and nuclear power) is cleaner than burning gasoline, and so driving an electric car releases less CO2 than driving a gas-powered car. "An electric vehicle running on [electricity generated with] coal has the fuel economy equivalent in the order of about 50 to 60 miles per gallon equivalent,” says David Keith, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management who studies the emergence of new technologies in the automotive industry. “So the dirtiest electric vehicle looks something like our best gasoline vehicles that are available today."

And an electric vehicle running on electricity generated by hydropower, solar, wind or other low-carbon energy sources can be significantly cleaner. "In New England or the Pacific Northwest, the fuel economy equivalent of an EV is into the hundreds: 110-120 miles per gallon equivalent," says Keith.

When you add this up over hundreds of miles, even though the U.S. electric grid isn’t currently carbon-free and even when accounting for the initial emissions associated with manufacturing the battery, electric cars still emit less CO2 than gas-powered cars.2 This is a key feature, given that, within the United States, the transportation sector produces the largest share of greenhouse gas emissions—nearly one-third of the country’s total emissions.3

A second major environmental benefit these batteries could offer is energy grid stabilization, Shao-Horn adds. As the world moves towards renewable energy resources, like solar and wind power, demand grows for ways of storing and saving this energy. Using batteries to store solar and wind power when it’s plentiful can help solve one big problem of renewable energy—balancing oversupply and shortage when the weather isn’t ideal—making it much easier to switch from CO2-emitting fossil fuels.

“If we have more batteries, we would be able to increase load level and then use [renewable energy] when we have more demand,” she says.


As usual, Patrick doesn't know what he's talking about.
 
Last edited:
Damn, If you had asked me what the one left wing idiocy Fatprick wouldn't support was, I'd have said "R/fuckcars style urbanism" on account of the rustang and scooter. Hes that much of an idiot.

Oh and has anyone else noticed that Childer in Chief is a bit big boned? A touch plump? Carrying a bit more his frame than most? Sorry to say this Childs, but Patfrick is fat. And has a honking huge pair O bitch titties.
 
"This just in: a train derailment in Milwaukee, WI has left dozens dead and hundreds more injured. We're here with one of the survivors, Patrick Tomlinson. Mr. Tomlinson, what can you say about the incident?"

:tomlinson: : "No, child, the train car was not tilting sideways. That is one of your delusions, again."
 
As usual, Patrick doesn't know what he's talking about.
This article is mistakenly assuming EVs won't all be designed to break in 2 years without being repairable. (They will. DRM-encumbered batteries...)
"This just in: a train derailment in Milwaukee, WI has left dozens dead and hundreds more injured. We're here with one of the survivors, Patrick Tomlinson. Mr. Tomlinson, what can you say about the incident?"

:tomlinson: : "No, child, the train car was not tilting sideways. That is one of your delusions, again."
Spoiler: Pat was the reason the train derailed. He sat a bit too far to the side, and, if you haven't noticed this before, he's more than a little bit pudgy...
 
Last edited:
You know what weighs more than an EV? A bus full of people you fat fuck.
You know what weighs more than a bus full of people?
FFD82eaXoAgRcSZ.jpg
This tubby bitch. Clearly the solution is to weld his doors shut so he can't get out and wear out the roads. The Chinese were on to something with that move.
 
Back