Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[There Is Light At The End]

WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE!?

One has pale skin and red hair
Other:

Don't trust them new niggas over there
Leaving they nigga essence in the air
Them happy nappy headed niggas with their fingers on the triggers
Don't trust them new niggas over there
Don't trust them big nostrils over yonder
They suck up so much air it'll make you wonder
Don't trust them new niggas with their spiny little nigga fingers
Don't trust them new niggas over there

 

[JamusActimus]

Way to waste ginger on a nigger

Don't use the hard r like that say Gingah

 

[Coldgrip]

The Halal Corral and other heccin’ terfarinos on this site have been given free rein to just dribble whatever mentally damaged bullshit out of their mouths and because it’s endorsed by Dear Feeder, people here unfortunately take it seriously. A big chunk of this thread is just deboonking the crazy crap they like to say. Any whammens that admit to liking sex or not hating men get called a pick me and get chased out and/or doxed accordingly by Logan Drip et. al. Women have a sex drive otherwise the human race would not actually exist, despite how many stickers you’ll get from the Halal Corral for saying as such.

Far older than that, I remember hearing this shit as a kid. Seem to recall that it's rooted in this idea that a proper lady isn't suppose to indulge in such base and vulgar desires. Part of the whole "feminine mystique" thing.

 

[There Is Light At The End]

Don't use the hard r like that say Gingah

Oi, mate! Tis a bit rewd!

 

[The Ugly One]

I didn't even smile. Was that supposed to be funny? To be fair, many people have said to me that I don't get jokes. So maybe it's something I'm not understanding.

It's woman humor, it's not supposed to be funny.

 

[David Kirk Ginder]

I don't like or dislike Andrew Tate but does anyone think Null's "hate" of Tate feels almost performative? On a recent MATI, he leads the news segment with a boring Tate update (a few women may or may not be seeking charges against him, a few women may or may not have dropped their charges against him). As if to signal to the KiwiFarms TERF userbase "just a reminder I'm on your side and you're welcome on this website"

Tate's shady and promiscuous past aside, Tate and Null likely share opinions on the gender roles and dynamic anyway.

 

[GunCar Gary]

I don't like or dislike Andrew Tate

like a lot of manosphere stuff, to me it's the chicken/egg question: did Andrew Tate get popular because he actually says things young men like, or did he get popular because he says things that makes women angry and that caused young men to get interested because their single whore moms and groomer teachers won't shut up about how bad he is? i've heard way more women complain about Tate than i've heard men of any age talk about him. i don't think i've run into a single adult man that's really cared about Tate one way or another

like a lot of modern media that focuses on "engagement" above all else it almost feels like Tate relies on getting clicks from women who are angry that a man is calling them out and his main business relies on women not minding their own business and getting angry at things people say on the internet. which is an excellent business model, because women are incapable of minding their own business

 

[RichardMongler]

I don't like or dislike Andrew Tate but does anyone think Null's "hate" of Tate feels almost performative? On a recent MATI, he leads the news segment with a boring Tate update (a few women may or may not be seeking charges against him, a few women may or may not have dropped their charges against him). As if to signal to the KiwiFarms TERF userbase "just a reminder I'm on your side and you're welcome on this website"

Tate's shady and promiscuous past aside, Tate and Null likely share opinions on the gender roles and dynamic anyway.

like a lot of manosphere stuff, to me it's the chicken/egg question: did Andrew Tate get popular because he actually says things young men like, or did he get popular because he says things that makes women angry and that caused young men to get interested because their single whore moms and groomer teachers won't shut up about how bad he is? i've heard way more women complain about Tate than i've heard men of any age talk about him. i don't think i've run into a single adult man that's really cared about Tate one way or another

like a lot of modern media that focuses on "engagement" above all else it almost feels like Tate relies on getting clicks from women who are angry that a man is calling them out and his main business relies on women not minding their own business and getting angry at things people say on the internet. which is an excellent business model, because women are incapable of minding their own business

I honestly believe Andrew Tate is being promoted by the media as a heel. I have never met anyone who earnestly likes Andrew Tate for his content. Then again, my circle of associates doesn't include extremely online teenagers, so who knows who his audience is? I've met far more Sam Hyde fans than Andrew Tate fans.

Antifeminist sentiment goes back generations. It's nothing new. Nick Fuentes and Andrew Tate did not manufacture any of this deep-seated resentment towards feminism or women in general. Antifeminism is a response to rearrangement in power relations set by a long timeline of various changes in the law and their influence on politics and culture which privileged middle class women at the expense of men generally.

 

[likeacrackado]

Women have a screwed up understanding of age gaps in dating. 28 y/o dude one night stand with 20 y/o woman, "you get em girl!, she's in her ho era" type encouragement of sleeping around. 26 y/o dude in committed relationship with 20 y/o woman, "ew sweetie that sounds like an abusive power dynamic, they're in totally different stages of life" implying or outright stating guys are weird/abusers for dating young women more than a couple years younger than they are.

No wonder there's so many mid-late 20s men using co-ed age women as sex objects.

 

[Spud]

did Andrew Tate get popular because he actually says things young men like, or did he get popular because he says things that makes women angry

That's the funniest part nothing he says is actually new, it's all old regurgitated PUA, old school red pill and The Rational Male blog type stuff. What's happened is that an environment has been created where someone like him can get infamy solely by not parroting the corporate line of "Man bad makes whamen sad", a majority 3rd world audience and paired with fantastic marketing by the very people who claim "YOU SHOULD NOT LISTEN TO HIM" and people like null regurgitate it as well to appeal to his base but in the process only exposed him to more people. Tate was a monster of their own creation cause what good is a "hero" with no "villain" and Tater-tot gladly played the part. It's just marketing and a lot of people bought it.

 

[David Kirk Ginder]

like a lot of manosphere stuff, to me it's the chicken/egg question: did Andrew Tate get popular because he actually says things young men like, or did he get popular because he says things that makes women angry and that caused young men to get interested because their single whore moms and groomer teachers won't shut up about how bad he is? i've heard way more women complain about Tate than i've heard men of any age talk about him. i don't think i've run into a single adult man that's really cared about Tate one way or another

like a lot of modern media that focuses on "engagement" above all else it almost feels like Tate relies on getting clicks from women who are angry that a man is calling them out and his main business relies on women not minding their own business and getting angry at things people say on the internet. which is an excellent business model, because women are incapable of minding their own business

I think that Tate got popular because of the combination of his mastery of the "algorithm" to get views/trending/viral (before his cancelling), the overreach of the feminist ideology, and society not actually providing a male role model for young men. He didn't get popular because of his views on men/women because almost nothing he says is new or original.

For all their talk about toxic masculinity, the establishment/powers that be doesn't actually provide an actual respectable modern male role model (Harry Styles in a dress and fags don't count). Every time there actually is a respectable man with some level of masculinity, the establishment rejects him, whether he's a person who puts a lot of thoughts in his words (Jordan Peterson), the handsome Chad who is a genuine nerd that cares about the source material (Henry Caville) or indeed the loud mouth that says whatever he wants (Andrew Tate). In a feminized cucked society, it's no surprise that Tate floats to the top.

Question for the thread: who are some media/establishment-approved male role models? And are they good or bad?
Bonus question: who are some media/establishment-approved female role models?

 

[National Defense Advocate]

The Halal Corral and other heccin’ terfarinos on this site have been given free rein to just dribble whatever mentally damaged bullshit out of their mouths and because it’s endorsed by Dear Feeder, people here unfortunately take it seriously. A big chunk of this thread is just deboonking the crazy crap they like to say. Any whammens that admit to liking sex or not hating men get called a pick me and get chased out and/or doxed accordingly by Logan Drip et. al. Women have a sex drive otherwise the human race would not actually exist, despite how many stickers you’ll get from the Halal Corral for saying as such.

Maybe I'm being extreme, but I'd completely get rid of the Salon and fold everything into the regular farm sections.
If you want to discuss cows, you can do it with the rest of us, not hide away in your corner of the site, spiteful of literally everybody else.
There is no discernable reason why bunch of angry TERFs with shitty attitudes towards the rest of the site is allowed to just sit there, spew a bunch of retarded bullshit, ban you from pointing out it's retarded bullshit and gets preferential treatment from staff.
If the Farms does end up shutting down, it won't be from swarms of trannies, it's gonna be triggered from the Salon, I guarantee it.

 

[David Kirk Ginder]

If the Farms does end up shutting down, it won't be from swarms of trannies, it's gonna be triggered from the Salon, I guarantee it.

Yep, I also said this in a previous post, if the troons don't shut down the farms, it will be from the enemy within (Kiwi Farms TERFs). Null has said multiple times that he wants to give TERFs a voice (freedom of speech) on the forum because everywhere else censors any criticism of trannies or the tranny ideology. With a few exceptions, women have no spaces to voice their opinions against the invasion of troons (ironic) apart from Kiwi Farms. And as a fellow supporter of freedom of speech, I support that noble goal.

My question is, what happens after we solve the troon problem? Are the feminists (because that's what TERFs are, it's in the name) just continue to let us have fun in our space here? Or will they regroup and refocus? You know Null, maybe opinions about women on this website are a bit harsh and makes female Kiwi Farms users feel unsafe and unwelcome... you should make Kiwi Farms more inclusive...

If you want to discuss cows, you can do it with the rest of us, not hide away in your corner of the site, spiteful of literally everybody else.

That's one reason I don't like Reddit: echo chambers. I'm not interested in the /r/conservative echo chamber, and god forbid, I'm not interested in /r/politics (official subreddit of the Democrat party). But as a neutral space where everyone has a voice? Then I'm all for it. May the most convincing argument win.

Hypothetically, how does a true and honest prog-leftist feminist browse Kiwi Farms? She'll get triggered by the sexism/racism/homophobia/islamophobia/ableism everywhere she goes unless like you said, she hides in her corner of the site with her sisters, carefully curating what she views so that she can laugh at lolcows in an ethical and sustainable and harm reductionist manner. That's some major mental gymnastics that won't cause problems further down the line.

As a woman-hating misogynist (not really), I can for example happily read JK Rowling's thread while not getting triggered by her feminism (which she is one).

 

[The Ugly One]

I try to minimize argumentative conflict with wahmens because they invariably pull the same boring shit and it grants me no pleasure to go over it again; muh dick, or rather, it's lack of function/deficiency, every single time I've had an IRL shouting match (these things do happen if you work for a living you know) with an XX bearer and the list has been gone down it always returns to the one immovable itinerary member, it's not even an age thing it's all of them from grannies to actual 9 year olds.
Muh dick has been mentioned more by irate womyn in the wild trying to get one over me than by teenage boys over any headset I've ever owned, my penis is fine thank you why do you feel denigrating it would benefit your position of the status of that tin of coleslaw in anyway? I'd be quite upset if it did drop off unexpectedly but your insinuations that it might don't especially bother me but I do worry why you'd think that they would and why you'd even mention my genitals in an argument over a bullshit refund.

I don't argue with women because women don't actually argue. I usually have a female poster clocked as a woman before I know her sex because of her inability to make arguments rather that engage in shaming, attention-seeking behavior, subject-changing, expressing personal offense, etc. The topic can be as mundane as the size of the toothpaste market.

Here is a true story. I worked for a company that had been acquired by another in a different industry. My new boss was a woman. She was working with me on a presentation for the executives, and had a slide that said the TAM of my industry, which the parent company was now targeting, was $2b. I said, "That's not quite right. 30% of that is consulting services, not software, and we don't sell consulting software. We need to make sure we don't overstate the market." She looked offended and said, "Our CEO cites the $2b number all the time. Do you think he's stupid? Do you think I'm stupid?"

I was taken aback by this. Being offended isn't an argument has nothing to do with the correctness of a number. She reacted to my statement like it was attack on her standing in the organization as an executive director. In general, women don't argue to make a point; they argue to maneuver into a social position, or get some kind of upper hand. It's tiresome, and when I figure out someone is a woman, I just stop ever arguing with them.

 

[David Kirk Ginder]

I don't argue with women because women don't actually argue. I usually have a female poster clocked as a woman before I know her sex because of her inability to make arguments rather that engage in shaming, attention-seeking behavior, subject-changing, expressing personal offense, etc.

Are there any studies about male and female ways of typing posts? Because my anecdotal experiences seem to suggest there are subtle but noticeable differences.

I'll be reading a post on any forum, on reddit, or on the YouTube comments section, and occasionally, I'll think to myself "he types like a woman" (because everyone on the Internet is a man) or "if this post was read out loud in real life, it would sound like a woman said it." Then I'll see their username and it's a female name, or if it's not a name, I'll dig deeper and from their history, I can glean that they are a woman.

I think the big red flag is the shaming tactics to make you feel bad for having an opinion that makes them feel personally offended, even though you were making a general observation or even though you specifically specified what you said was a generalization. Like Jesse Lee Peterson (based Black guy) says: not all, not all, not all.

 

[eaglesfan665]

I honestly believe Andrew Tate is being promoted by the media as a heel. I have never met anyone who earnestly likes Andrew Tate for his content.

he says is actually new, it's all old regurgitated PUA, old school red pill and The Rational Male blog type stuff.

He didn't get popular because of his views on men/women because almost nothing he says is new or original.

From my experience with guys that like at least some of Tate's talking points, his appeal is largely in that he presents all the redpill and PUA stuff (that feels like it's regurgitated and trite to us) to a normie audience that either doesn't have time to sit on forums and imageboards or is otherwise unaware of them. I've never had any interest in listening to him because he is brown and lives in Romania, all the alleged crimes are just suplemental to the opinion I have formed of him. On the other hand, a normie might not care that he is brown, for example.

 

[Teghern]

I don't argue with women because women don't actually argue. I usually have a female poster clocked as a woman before I know her sex because of her inability to make arguments rather that engage in shaming, attention-seeking behavior, subject-changing, expressing personal offense, etc. The topic can be as mundane as the size of the toothpaste market.

Yes they never actually address the issue at conflict it's always about personal virtue as it relates to social status, because that's what they're actually bothered about not the material reality. There is no victory to be had so fighting it is totally pointless, best just to disregard as much as possible.
Men do this sort of thing only if they're trying to start a fight or sow discord but for wahmens it's standard procedure and it really makes you think what the motivation is, intentional? I don't think so as they really do seem incapable of not making it all about themselves. Just look at all the forum egofag drama that boils up every so often where it's feminite posters screeching about how they get targeted and they cause triggers and they they they etc, never anything structural or specific there just themselves, peak feminity.

 

[GratsTheat783]

I don't argue with women because women don't actually argue.

Once on a Discord server, there was a discussion on abortion. The guy (pro-life) was posting well thought out messages with 1-3 lines that explained his point while the woman he was arguing with (pro-choice) would send vague hastily written short messages like "that's not", "omg like", "you dont get it", "thats not it" and other similar things without ever making a clear point.

I've noticed a thing online where people will insert a swear word where it's not needed to try and emphasize a point. It's not really related to the thread, but a lot of the time it's really cringy.

 

[AgendaPoster]

lives in Romania

Unfortunately, although he is an imported entity that not natively produced.
If he's found guilty, his stay might end. Fingers crossed.
Unlike you, I largely couldn't care less about what he does, I just don't want him doing it to Romanian women.

 

[National Defense Advocate]

Yes they never actually address the issue at conflict it's always about personal virtue as it relates to social status, because that's what they're actually bothered about not the material reality. There is no victory to be had so fighting it is totally pointless, best just to disregard as much as possible.
Men do this sort of thing only if they're trying to start a fight or sow discord but for wahmens it's standard procedure and it really makes you think what the motivation is, intentional? I don't think so as they really do seem incapable of not making it all about themselves. Just look at all the forum egofag drama that boils up every so often where it's feminite posters screeching about how they get targeted and they cause triggers and they they they etc, never anything structural or specific there just themselves, peak feminity.

I am reminded of that video of a robbery a month or so ago.
Black guy steals a white woman's purse while another white man simply glanced up and ignored her.
Women, even on here, were absolutely furious about it, and only got more so when others pointed out "Well why would he?" Why would he fight an overgrown baboon with a GLAWK FOWTY, the precedent has already been set that the State WILL jail you for trying to intervene.
He had nothing to gain and everything to lose.