The thing that really confuses me is they insist the urban centers are profitable enough to pay for themselves, you presumably shouldn't even need the billionaire tax.
In particular I'm extremely skeptical of the
Urban3 charts NJB pushes all the time (bigger line = "more profitable", i.e., "more tax revenue collected") to insist that suburbs (and I guess rural areas) are subsidized by urban centers.
View attachment 5987143
Ignoring the fact that there's no actual numerical data provided here I really don't understand how "tax revenue collected" is somehow indicative of overall value. You're telling me the farms that provide all the food necessary for everyone here to live is somehow functionally worthless?
This just doesn't pass the eye test for me.