Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.3%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 105 34.4%
  • Total voters
    305
Burn It All Down said:
Aaron has an ex-wife who has primary custody of their kids. Any info on degeneracy on Aaron's end could be enough for his ex to get visitation terminated. Nick's wife is as degen as he is so the courts might just laugh at them both. In other words, Aaron has more to lose. Why he (Aaron) would mention drug use though is beyond me.
Click to expand...
From what i've seen of Aaron I would wonder just how much he actually cares about his kids or anyone for that matter
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: HenryRollinsLiar, Dr Naomi Hunter, Exterminatus and 3 others
AnOminous said:
He should sack up because if he doesn't, Nick is just going to spew it anyway like a total retard in one of his blind drunk rages.
Click to expand...
You aren't wrong. He can always get visitation back if he proves he cleaned up his act. If the hypothetical dirt Nick has is more illegal than drug use, it could get him in more trouble, having visitation terminated. In that case, he can go for MAD and release more info on Nick.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: PhoBingas, AnOminous and Douglas Mortimer
Fools Idol said:
Here's a question, I know Nick is black out blasted but what is his issue with the Judge's ruling? He must have some idea racking around in that empty head of his that he is trying to get out but my inability to understand drunk retard and my lack of knowledge on the law means that I have no idea what he's even talking about.
Click to expand...

The next phase of the court process is "discovery". Its a process of gathering information and getting depositions from people before a trial might happen. Nick contends that discovery is unnecessary. That the case is obviously without any merit whatsoever and the judge should just end the case immediately. The judge disagreed and said the case should proceed to discovery.

Why does Nick think the case is without merit. Basically because he has convinced himself of things that are not true about what he did and what the law is. This includes:

1) Rather than stating that Monty was engaging in pedo acts, Nick claims he said Monty was "probably" engaging in them. And because he said probably, its an opinion and not defamation. The issue for Nick is that this is a lie. He didn't say probably. He made a statement of fact that Monty was doing pedo acts.

2) Nick says that if someone is accused of being a pedo, they have an obligation in any defamation case of proving beyond any doubt that they are NOT a pedo. That rather than Nick having to prove that Monty is a pedo to back up his statement, Monty has to prove that he is not a pedo to Nick. This has no basis in law or reason.

3) Nick doesn't understand the concept of "per se" defamation under the law and what it means in terms of proving damages. Nick thinks that Monty must explicitly prove he was damaged for there to be a valid case. Nick just doesn't understand the law here. "per se" defamation assumes that the defaming statement was of such a nature that damages can be assumed.

4) Nick claims that discovery in the case is meaningless because all the facts associated with the case are already known. Nick comes to this conclusion through circular logic. Because the case is baseless, there can be facts to discover in the case beyond the facts necessary to dismiss the case as baseless.

Part of the reason IMO for Nick's breakdown last night was that Nick's false self-gaslit view of the world came into conflict with the real world in the form of the appeals court ruling. And when that happens, Nick falls apart. Its not much different than how he mentally collapsed after he was challenged on his attorney credentials by Eric July.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Hellion, Style, Rafael Epstein and 56 others
Christ, even Marzgurl is dunking on him..

Screenshot 2024-05-21 141948.png

ETA: And Renfamous......... too...

Screenshot 2024-05-21 143449.png
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Mankirk, gamjecs and 25 others
Potatoherder said:
I know people will want Nick's drunken streams to continue but i do think some sort of punishment against drinking streams should happen. So many creators i used to watch have fallen under the spell and ruined their content. At the very least the drinking shots for superchats meta should be banned.
View attachment 6007931
Click to expand...

Sharpeteer said:
Shower call in Jeremy's near future.
Click to expand...

The shower call happened fast. Because the Xeet is already deleted
imagem_2024-05-21_162410720.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: gamjecs, makeup, Arkin O'Brien and 15 others
I now watched most of the stream minus the Hasan impression and I'm impressed.
Having this much confidence to show yourself to the world in this state is beyond the ego of mere mortals.
The faces he makes are artistic.

"Are we there yet?"

Right.pngUp.pngLeft.png


"Is this it?"

ow.png

"The Destination"

whoops.png
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Shlomo XL, make_it_so, Arkin O'Brien and 14 others
Potatoherder said:
I know people will want Nick's drunken streams to continue but i do think some sort of punishment against drinking streams should happen. So many creators i used to watch have fallen under the spell and ruined their content. At the very least the drinking shots for superchats meta should be banned.

Click to expand...
Hambly deleted this btw.

Reminder that Nick's rumble copy is still up.

I've also archived it.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: The Repeated Meme, Himedall All-seeing Waifu, Balanced Boomer and 79 others
WhimsicalTrolli said:
There's no way rekieta will still be married by years end if he isn't in rehab.
Click to expand...
He's broke or well on his way to broke if she was going to divorce him it would have been 2022-2023 when he actually had money. She has already waited 20 years for the trust fund to mature but the second he gets that fat check after his parents croak, he's getting served. Unless he's been cut out of the will already (unlikely) then there's even odds she ods or she just straight up leaves and pretends she was never married.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: TheGuntinator, Maude Snew, Justa Grata Honoria and 2 others
Burn It All Down said:
Aaron has an ex-wife who has primary custody of their kids. Any info on degeneracy on Aaron's end could be enough for his ex to get visitation terminated. Nick's wife is as degen as he is so the courts might just laugh at them both. In other words, Aaron has more to lose. Why he (Aaron) would mention drug use though is beyond me.
Click to expand...

Ironically the source of tension with the ex-wife over the kids was always April. Even Aaron's parents loathed April and thought she should explicitly be kept away from the children. I think overall that their so much happiness that April is out of Aaron's life that nothing said about what he had been doing when April was around is going to be held against him now.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: HenryRollinsLiar, Laura Loomer, PhoBingas and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back