Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.4%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 30.9%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.7%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 86 32.5%
  • Total voters
    265
Considering the amount of drugs they seem to have had on them at time of arrest and how fucked Nick has been I'm having trouble being upset that a "Snitch" called the police on him. Long-term the children are better off not surrounded by degenerate drug addicts who cant go one day without getting blackout drunk and snorting shit. Not to mention the weird sex shit.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: Oscar Winner, Arkin O'Brien, Qonas and 24 others
holyhandgrenade said:
Balldoman is rich so that's like a -5 to spending time in jail on the other hand everyone in the legal profession in his area hates him so that's like a +10 yeah he's gonna get rammed as hard as they possibly can
Click to expand...
Every smoothbrain in this thread is acting like he's going to get a harsher sentence because he's white. He's has generational wealth and that overrides everything. I do agree that he may have rubbed enough people the wrong way to get a more heavy-handed sentence than he normally would though.
 
  • Dumb
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: make_it_so, Qonas, kokokrunch123 and 13 others
Pizza Time said:
Can someone with better legalese explain what the charges mean more specifically?
Click to expand...
A general drug possession charge which could be of any Schedule, 1-4, particularly as specified under Minnesota law:
Minnesota State Statutes 152.025 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CRIME IN THE FIFTH DEGREE. said:
Subd. 2. Possession and other crimes. A person is guilty of controlled substance crime in the fifth degree and upon conviction may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 4 if:
(1) the person unlawfully possesses one or more mixtures containing a controlled substance classified in Schedule I, II, III, or IV, except cannabis[...]

[...] Subd. 4. Penalty. (a) A person convicted under the provisions of subdivision 2, clause (1), who has not been previously convicted of a violation of this chapter or a similar offense in another jurisdiction, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor [and not a felony] if: (1) the amount of the controlled substance possessed, other than heroin, is less than 0.25 grams or one dosage unit or less if the controlled substance was possessed in dosage units; or (2) the controlled substance possessed is heroin and the amount possessed is less than 0.05 grams.

(b) A person convicted under the provisions of subdivision 1; subdivision 2, clause (1), unless the conduct is described in paragraph (a); [...] may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
Click to expand...
The second charge is for possession of a firearm while also possessing a controlled substance:
Minnesota State Statutes 624.713 CERTAIN PERSONS NOT TO POSSESS FIREARMS. said:
Subd. 1. Ineligible Persons. The following persons shall not be entitled to possess ammunition or a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon or, except for clause (1), any other firearm: [...]
(10) a person who:
(iii) is an unlawful user of any controlled substance as defined in chapter 152. The use of medical cannabis [...] products by a person 21 years of age or older does not constitute the unlawful use of a controlled substance under this item;

Subd. 2. Penalties. [...]
(c) A person named in any other clause of subdivision 1 who possesses any type of firearm or ammunition is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

Subd. 3. Notice. (a) When a person is convicted of [...] a crime of violence as defined in section 624.712, subdivision 5, the court shall inform the defendant that the defendant is prohibited from possessing ammunition or a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon for the remainder of the person's lifetime, and that it is a felony offense to violate this prohibition...
Click to expand...
More interestingly:
Minnesota State Statutes 624.712 DEFINITIONS. said:
Subdivision 5. Crime of violence. "Crime of violence" means: felony convictions of the following offenses: [...] chapter 152 (drugs, controlled substances); and an attempt to commit any of these offenses.
Click to expand...

TL;DR: Rekieta is looking at possibly a felony (5th degree drug possession) or a gross misdemeanor, and another gross misdemeanor (gun charge). Conviction of felony Controlled Substance Crime in the Fifth Degree would lead to prohibition of his gun rights, among other things.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL, Male Idiot, Associate Rick and 22 others
Thread moving really fast but unless the bodycam footage is used in the courtroom (ie. case goes to trial) the footage will not be released to an FOIA request.

1716508780604.png

From here: https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/types/body-camera/
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, madethistocomment, Major-General and 130 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back