Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 30.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 86 32.5%

  • Total voters
    265
Any lawyers here? Would fessing up, pleading for mercy, and going to rehab help his case?

That seems like the responsible thing to do as a Dad. But would the justice system bend you over harder for doing that. Not sure what the play is on denying the possession.
Not a lawyer, but it's very common (and smart) for defendants to shut the fuck up until they can strike a guilty plea deal with the prosecutor. I understand why people would assume Nick isn't ever planning on taking a guilty plea. But him not coming out on locals and proclaiming his guilt shouldn't really be treated as evidence of what direction he'll go. There's already tons of evidence that he'll cope and sneed based on the last two fucking years. To me this isn't really evidence of much.
 
Has anyone posted this yet? Apparently it was his pastor:
Archive
GOX6d2MXUAE_osk.jpg
 
Possibly. But such negotiations should not be done by the defendant. Part of the reason why its said a Lawyer should never represent themselves is because it gives them the right to refuse with no repercussions. If they hire a defense Attorney who goes to the State and says "You got us, but, I don't think you have us on X. You only got us on the lesser Y. Therefore, lets save everyone the trouble. My client will plead to Y if you drop X. Besides, he's a member of the bar. He has a family. He owns property. This is his first offense. He's SORRY. Lets convict him of Y, give him probation and he swears he won't drink, do drugs, or own guns again. This will fix the issues, everyone is happy and the State doesn't have to pay for housing him for the next 25 years, or figure out what to do with his kids,. Everyone wins, the guilty parties are punished and social catharsis is achieved!

This is not possible if Rekieta represents himself. Because there is no stand off. The Defense Attorney does not get to go back to the Defendant and regail them of the awesome deal they just scored and how they can restore societies faith in the legal system if they just accept. If there is no stand off there is no acceptance. There is only the State and the Defendant. You think it should not matter and on paper it should not.

But make no mistake it matters. If Rekieta represents himself the State has no reason to offer a deal. Because to offer a deal would be to acquiesce to the criminal. Who they have dead to rights. Rather then their attorney by proxy.

The psychological difference makes ALL the difference.
Thank you for the thoughful reply. (edit) Missed the last part. That's helpful.

Dead to rights?
 
Well I mean we are just seeing a small piece. The actual full picture might be much much worse.
That's actually my bet as to why he broke rule #1 (don't talk to the police) to make sure that April would not get implicated. She has been living with the Rekietas for months now and has no doubt seen a whole lot more illegal activity. The worst case scenario for Rekieta would have been her taking a deal in exchange for testimony, and then opening a whole bunch more cans of worms regarding illegal conduct.

Now the prosecutors have no leverage over April, so she has no incentive to talk to them (and a lot of incentive not to, if she was involved in that illegal conduct in any capacity).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crinoids
So when you consider what Monty is suing Nick over; you ask Nick, he downplays it as "Oh, and I said something like 'Monty allegedly liked sucking little boy penis.'"
I mean the thing is, while what he said is legally actionable, it's not that far off from the sentiment people would have held about him before all of this. Montagraph was getting dunked on by Rekieta and Jim because he was a larping weirdo with delusions of grandeur about his influence, while making weird short films about him torturing and raping teenage girls or whatever. Obviously this isn't to excuse Nick, he should have known better to throw an "allegedly" in front of whatever shit talk he had for Monty at the time, and ultimately that's why nobody's really on his side here.

But that doesn't make Monty any less of a creepy pervey weirdo just based off what we know about him.
 
i guess, yeah
i'm not really convinced he was actually cooking up rocks in his fucking bedroom, but i don't see any other explanation for why the hell there would be cocaine residue on a pan either.
If the house was as filthy and dusty as the report described then maybe it was the only clear surface they could make lines on.
 
Now, I'm sure we can all agree that the SMART thing for Rackets to do now would be to go radio silent for awhile. No streams, no tweets, nothing. He already put out his brief statement acknowledging (in a completely idiotic way) the current events, so the SMART thing to do is to shut up so as to not provide additional ammunition to interested parties within the state machine.

Which is why I fully expect him to stream tonight or tomorrow night, acting like a complete douche... Remember to smile REALLY big for the camera, Nicky! Gotta leave a good impression for those jurors who're going to be seeing this evidence -- er, I mean, this example of bravery you're putting forward for the world to see and to put the haters to shame!
I think even ethan ralph at this point would give one of his fake apologies "I messed up and hurt the people I love"

even ethan ralph isn't this brazen we could probably write psych papers on this :story:
 
Bruh why is he worried about doing a damn show. His fucking update isn't even apologizing to his family nor his fans. Fuck him.
Buddy, he has NOTHING to apologize for! If they hadn't been squirted out of his wife's now-ruined body, he wouldn't have to deal with the bullshit of being responsible in a family household, nor would he have to drunkenly drive them to social activities or church. No church, no report from the pastor. As you can see this is clearly the FAULT of his family and THEY should be apologizing to him!
 
Because he is a coward and a pussy. Throwing it to the ground.
He should have shown he was a real man, protecting his castle and took a swing at the cop. Like Fatrick did on video once.

Be better Nick, next time show them who is the man.
I'm actually rather astonished that he didn't go all retard chimp on the cops. I credit that to some brilliant police actions that caught him unawares up the block and had him cuffed and compliant before he knew what was happening.
 
Back