i understand but why is this police document not available through the state of minnesota? i think the screen shot, of the report detail, is more than likely legitimate, but who leaked it?
While Nick hates effort, he also hates being mocked and the authorities separating his kids will be seen as an affront to his totally awesome parenting skills. I'm still torn between whether he'll actually succeed or not (I have no trust towards public services either), but he'll most certainly make at least an attempt to bring them back to the Balldo manor.
Not a fucking chance in hell. He'll triple down on any horrible legal choice he can make just to own us pearl-clutching incel prudes and the shyster lawtubers who dare to have contrary opinions towards him.
I think she sang like a canary and will be a prosecution witness.
Wouldn't it depend on what the pastor reported exactly? If the attack on the warrant is due lack of probable cause from the pastor's statement, that leads to a fairly deferential analysis based on indicia of reliability. But for one, he's a community pastor and mandatory reporter who's reporting under his name to the police under threat of penalty if he's lying, which makes what he says pretty presumptively reliable. If he has knowledge of the home, the goings-ons of the family, statements from the kids, and so on, it's going to be very difficult to attack the warrant. He may have worked in a ministerial capacity with addicts or drug users in the past, giving him particular knowledge supporting the suspicions he reported. Plus, the police probably investigated and affirmed aspects of whatever the pastor reported. Until we see the warrant itself, it'll be difficult to come to any conclusions about using the pastor's report to the police as the basis for the warrant.
He's said before that his kids have church events on Wednesdays, sometimes with family participation. If he showed up particularly fucked up, and the clergy recognized and/or inquired into it, that could be the basis for the report.
I personally like to follow Potentially Criminal / Sean he can be pretty funny while going over cases and there is no way he isn't gonna cover this case.
He already said that.
Didn't work for Trump or Chauvin.
You're welcome.
Yeah, to us, this is the biggest legal happening since Chris-Chan did the thing which shall not be named. To them it's a pretty simple drug case with some white trash idiots. The only unusual part is that they were pretty clean cut and well-to-do not long ago.
To be fair, they are a lot more likeable than Nick.
Nobody on the Jury liked Chauvin as far as I can tell. He moved for change of venue to get this out of the local place where the controversy happened specifically to avoided a prejudice jury. That got denied.
The way coke is packaged in large quantities is not using the full bag. They pack it into the corner super tight, twist and knot it, and cut off the access, including the zipper part which weighs the most. This is about as much of the bag that would be used
And one of the paraphernalia pieces listed with the rest of the drugs was a bag sealer.
In general, sure. In the context of media nonstop "he murdered a black man by suffocating him as he begged for life", well, people are going to find that hard to like, even among racists.
I think the conflict of interest might be because the judge assigned is the one on the Monte case?
