Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 30.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 86 32.5%

  • Total voters
    265
Fuck. I log in after a couple of hours off. Only 12 more pages until I reach 4082, that's manageable.
Wait.... Last page isn't 4082, it's 4282. WTF, another 200 pages to go? Jesus wept.

So have we figured out why April's credit cards were in the Rekieta master bedroom? Is it just because that's where she puts them when she takes them out of her pockets before she climbs into bed?
Which presumably would mean she's sharing the main bedroom with Nick and Kayla?

Gotta feel sorry for those fucking kids...
 
Jesus Christ. I haven't watched lawtube in so long.

How it started:
lawtube1.JPG

How it's going:
lawtube2.JPG
 
I wonder if the "physical and/or sexual abuse" part might be Rekieta drunk-driving the kids around and Kayla allowing it. I also wonder if it might have something to do with the two of them failing to feed their children or even buy food at all, since cokeheads don't eat. One would assume that the latter would be put more on Kayla.
Yeah, people need to avoid jumping the gun on that. The bail hearing thing only mentioned the kids in regards to neglect, and if there was evidence of sexual or violent physical abuse I don't think Nick would have been let out on bail so quickly.

Most likely Nick is a bad father because he gets black out drunk every night, is hungover in the morning when he's supposed to be driving his kids around and keeps lots of drugs and guns in the house, and is more concerned with banging April than taking care of his own children. This is enough to shame the man we don't need to drift into false accusations when nothing has indicated that he beats or bangs his kids and saying that just allows Nick to dismiss everything as fake and gay gossip. Better to stick to the facts.

People are still saying Steel Toe reported Nick to the cops too lol.

Mental midgets always need everything always fucking spoonfed to them and anyway his kids were definitely endangered! The mandatory reporter did the right thing. Nick and his wife are ghouls from Fallout! They have coke and guns just laying around. There is no way that the kids were being looked after.

Right, the family ghoulmaxxing would be enough to draw concern of anyone who sees them on a day to day basis and watches them melt away. The Pastor did the right thing by reporting it.

Jim time. Rackets is probably at least 6 shots in the whiskey at this point tonight.
LFG.
 
Jesus Christ. I haven't watched lawtube in so long.

How it started:
View attachment 6022130

How it's going:
View attachment 6022132
ohh that guy he's an insufferable **** who platforms the most wacky nonsensical libertarians who do nothing besides violate the balls of Russian tyrants
what's that guy that looks like he sucks man off a truck stops
 
the bigger question is what was on the search warrant. kurt made this point last night and i think it's solid (regardless of whatever else people feel about him).

i think it's safe to assume that they had a warrant to knock down the door and look for drugs, but if there's any defending nick at this point, that's the point in the process that needs to be scrutinized. how did this turn from a child endangerment case into a drug bust? what was on that search warrant and what was the probable cause?
>mfw the guy I need probable cause on follows his dealer on instagram and I already have him in custody on distribution

smug cop.png

The best part is it can be shit that stupid these days. Watch police shows like the First 48. They'll have someone hop on social media as one of the first things they do to see who a suspect is running with, where they might be, and start seeing who they can put pressure on.
 
Maybe I phrased my post wrongly. It's not the legally correct thing to do; it's a tactically appropriate thing to do considering potential legal arguments in the future.
Yes, but you need to preserve arguments and technicalities now or else you forfeit them when you get to the courtroom later. That's my (and Sean's) only point.

Understood, so my question becomes why Sean would think Nick's conduct was even tactically advantageous, or what exactly Nick was trying to preserve. This appears to be more of an emotional response than anything tactical as the only argument being preserved amounts to: "Your honor, I didn't even want the police to be there."

Given Nick's legal decisions in his own life, Nick is more concerned with his ego than anything. Making the police work for it to get into the premises leads to a net loss for Nick and his family, and that is entirely due to Nick's non-compliance. That said, you don't have to answer for Sean and why he thought it was "good" either legally or tactically.

Thank you for elaborating on the theory behind what Sean was saying, though the context Sean is applying this reasoning to is... puzzling at best.

He's an asshole, but from the incident report, it isn't clear they showed him the search warrant before they kicked in the door. It looks like:

1. Traffic stop Nick
2. Try to enter the residence with the search warrant, get rebuffed by a child
3. Try to get the entry code from Nick, he refuses
4. The police kick in the door
5. They bring Nick to the residence and show him the search warrant, he throws it on the floor

Maybe they showed him a copy of the search warrant during the traffic stop, but if they did, it isn't detailed in the report.

Technically, there is no indication of when Nick was informed of or otherwise shown a search warrant.

Nick demanded a copy when they got to the house possibly so he could throw it on the ground to preserve his legal argument that he didn't want them on his property.

Copy of Warrant.png

Information is spotty. Looking forward to that bodycam footage.

Everyone seems to forget that cops are allowed to lie. They can, and do, lie to coerce various types of case-making confessions ("we know what you did so fess up to cut a deal") and consent-establishing searches ("the warrant is on the way but it'll look better if you let us get started"). That's just in normal everyday cases, too, before you factor in Nick's internet (in)famous status which could pretty easily bring crazy people playing make believe as cops to his door step.

We do not have a minute-by-minute timeline of what appears to be a very hasty use of force. We do not have body cam footage. Hell, we don't even have Nick's coked-out recounting of events.

The description given in the probable cause document does not establish that the police had contact with anyone at the house beyond the minor child before ramming the door.

That same document does suggest Nick was not shown a valid warrant prior to arriving on scene, by which point the door was already busted down.

If no adult on scene (meaning Kayla or possibly even April) had made contact with the cops to be shown the warrant, and Nick himself hadn't yet been shown the warrant, then it is absolutely the correct thing to do to refuse entry in what is probably a grand total of 5 very chaotic minutes.

No one is arguing that cops don't lie. Unsure why you brought that up since there is no evidence that the policed lied in this instance. Sounds like a personal story is behind this, but I don't mean to pry.

If a child is answering the door because the only adults are strung out somewhere, and the police are there due to possible child endangerment due to drug use or the like, there will be a sense of urgency.

From a police or EMS perspective, every second counts when a child is potentially in danger, but then maybe I'm not focusing enough on Nick's legal needs.
 
Back