- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
Already 14,000 viewers, this is his biggest stream in years.Jimbo is on
Edit: 15,000 and still rising.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Already 14,000 viewers, this is his biggest stream in years.Jimbo is on
Yeah, people need to avoid jumping the gun on that. The bail hearing thing only mentioned the kids in regards to neglect, and if there was evidence of sexual or violent physical abuse I don't think Nick would have been let out on bail so quickly.I wonder if the "physical and/or sexual abuse" part might be Rekieta drunk-driving the kids around and Kayla allowing it. I also wonder if it might have something to do with the two of them failing to feed their children or even buy food at all, since cokeheads don't eat. One would assume that the latter would be put more on Kayla.
People are still saying Steel Toe reported Nick to the cops too lol.
Mental midgets always need everything always fucking spoonfed to them and anyway his kids were definitely endangered! The mandatory reporter did the right thing. Nick and his wife are ghouls from Fallout! They have coke and guns just laying around. There is no way that the kids were being looked after.
LFG.Jim time. Rackets is probably at least 6 shots in the whiskey at this point tonight.
ohh that guy he's an insufferable **** who platforms the most wacky nonsensical libertarians who do nothing besides violate the balls of Russian tyrantsJesus Christ. I haven't watched lawtube in so long.
How it started:
View attachment 6022130
How it's going:
View attachment 6022132
All that money spent on PUA scams when he can just pay for prostitutes. Or some fucking liposuction. Kurt is fat and women won't have sex with him.All that money Kurt spends on PUA scams and the like and he can't pay for bariatric surgery or Ozempic?
Already 14,000 viewers, this is his biggest stream in years.
She’s probably cutting up lines with the credit cardsSo have we figured out why April's credit cards were in the Rekieta master bedroom?
>mfw the guy I need probable cause on follows his dealer on instagram and I already have him in custody on distributionthe bigger question is what was on the search warrant. kurt made this point last night and i think it's solid (regardless of whatever else people feel about him).
i think it's safe to assume that they had a warrant to knock down the door and look for drugs, but if there's any defending nick at this point, that's the point in the process that needs to be scrutinized. how did this turn from a child endangerment case into a drug bust? what was on that search warrant and what was the probable cause?
Viva has always been some weird Canadian Hippie though.Jesus Christ. I haven't watched lawtube in so long.
How it started:
View attachment 6022130
How it's going:
View attachment 6022132
THE FRO MUST GROWJesus Christ. I haven't watched lawtube in so long.
How it started:
View attachment 6022130
How it's going:
View attachment 6022132
What shilling for Microsoft does to mofo.Jesus Christ. I haven't watched lawtube in so long.
How it started:
View attachment 6022130
How it's going:
View attachment 6022132
Maybe I phrased my post wrongly. It's not the legally correct thing to do; it's a tactically appropriate thing to do considering potential legal arguments in the future.
Yes, but you need to preserve arguments and technicalities now or else you forfeit them when you get to the courtroom later. That's my (and Sean's) only point.
He's an asshole, but from the incident report, it isn't clear they showed him the search warrant before they kicked in the door. It looks like:
1. Traffic stop Nick
2. Try to enter the residence with the search warrant, get rebuffed by a child
3. Try to get the entry code from Nick, he refuses
4. The police kick in the door
5. They bring Nick to the residence and show him the search warrant, he throws it on the floor
Maybe they showed him a copy of the search warrant during the traffic stop, but if they did, it isn't detailed in the report.
Everyone seems to forget that cops are allowed to lie. They can, and do, lie to coerce various types of case-making confessions ("we know what you did so fess up to cut a deal") and consent-establishing searches ("the warrant is on the way but it'll look better if you let us get started"). That's just in normal everyday cases, too, before you factor in Nick's internet (in)famous status which could pretty easily bring crazy people playing make believe as cops to his door step.
We do not have a minute-by-minute timeline of what appears to be a very hasty use of force. We do not have body cam footage. Hell, we don't even have Nick's coked-out recounting of events.
The description given in the probable cause document does not establish that the police had contact with anyone at the house beyond the minor child before ramming the door.
That same document does suggest Nick was not shown a valid warrant prior to arriving on scene, by which point the door was already busted down.
If no adult on scene (meaning Kayla or possibly even April) had made contact with the cops to be shown the warrant, and Nick himself hadn't yet been shown the warrant, then it is absolutely the correct thing to do to refuse entry in what is probably a grand total of 5 very chaotic minutes.