Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 30.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 86 32.5%

  • Total voters
    265
Unless my instincts are totally fucked it isn't sex abuse. This charge lumps in sex abuse, physical abuse, and neglect (which is child abuse). I believe Nick and Kayla were so perpetually fucked up they neglected their kids, but his fantasies seem centered around adults. I hope. Right? RIGHT?
The depths of degeneracy can know no bounds as far as I've seen.
 
Your honor, have you ever heard of the comic book called Sonichu?
Pro se Rekieta: "Your honour I know I sound pretty fucked up or whatever, but there are others out there like me. It's so weird. There's this streamer iDubbbz who wore one and then he became a cuck and married a Lebanese woman and the only people hairier than the Lebanese are Armenians who wouldn't even exist if the Ottomans did their job... *drink* the Kardashians all fuck black guys like they're the police. AHHHH hahaha but I love black people, if I could I'd own one for myself or whatever."

Judge Fischer: "Death penalty."
 
Unless my instincts are totally fucked it isn't sex abuse. This charge lumps in sex abuse, physical abuse, and neglect (which is child abuse). I believe Nick and Kayla were so perpetually fucked up they neglected their kids, but his fantasies seem centered around adults. I hope. Right? RIGHT?
Screenshot_20240525_233937_YouTube.jpg
 
The way Jim started talking about the kids being near drugs made me wonder if the "physical abuse" is that Kayla let one of the kids actually ingest drugs on her watch. Even if they could/would charge a kid for drug crimes, it wouldn't be public knowledge and their identities would be shielded. If a parent knew they did this, could it be coded as "physical abuse" in the system, like the difference between causing a kid to be around drugs and allowing them to use?
 
Something isn't adding up with Kayla's charge of "child neglect - knowingly permitting physical/sexual." The factual basis for the charge in Kayla's complaint is identical to what's in Nick's complaint (kids around drugs), only the code section is different.

Kayla:
Kayla.png
Nick:
Nick.png

There are two possibilities:

1. The different charge was accidental, a typo. Kayla was supposed to be charged the same as Nick but Kayla's complaint has the wrong code subsection. They meant to charge both under Nick's code section but screwed up Kayla's.

2. The different charge is legit and they accidentally copied the factual basis for Nick's charge into Kayla's. The real factual basis for Kayla's charge was mistakenly omitted.

My money is on typo. They intended to charge both under the same code section using the same factual basis but someone screwed up Kayla's code section. If Kayla knowingly permitted someone to physically/sexually abuse the kid(s), then you'd assume that person would be charged with the actual physical/sexual abuse, which obviously hasn't happened.
 
The way Jim started talking about the kids being near drugs made me wonder if the "physical abuse" is that Kayla let one of the kids actually ingest drugs on her watch. Even if they could/would charge a kid for drug crimes, it wouldn't be public knowledge and their identities would be shielded. If a parent knew they did this, could it be coded as "physical abuse" in the system, like the difference between causing a kid to be around drugs and allowing them to use?
I'm leaning towards the THC gummy theory. Maybe I'm optimistic.
 
Can someone explain to me why there seems to be this assumption that Kayla is remotely better for the kids even on her own? Based on what exactly? Was she not sleeping in the middle of the day with kids in the house high as fuck and passed out? Taking part in degenerate bullshit with, as far as we know, complete willingness? How do we even know this isn't a mutual thing or even potentially suggested initially by her?
Male feminists of kiwifarms will do anything to excuse a woman.
 
Unless my instincts are totally fucked it isn't sex abuse. This charge lumps in sex abuse, physical abuse, and neglect (which is child abuse). I believe Nick and Kayla were so perpetually fucked up they neglected their kids, but his fantasies seem centered around adults. I hope. Right? RIGHT?
I think while he was fucking the side hoe, maybe she got pissed off and slapped the children or some shit. She might have "only" cuffed them upside the head while high on coke. Hit, shoved, slapped ect.

She is just as much of a coke addict as he is, it is very believable that she physically abused her children, particaurally the little children who are more needy as in: a 6 year old can't cook for himself and asked mommy for food, she got pissed and maybe hit him.

Like our Dear Sneeder says: Grim
 
Back