Whenever someone wants to argue about video games as an artistic medium, you should just call them a faggot and tell them to read a book.
You'd be surprised but it's hard in software to find good leaders and even just identifying those who are interested and capable of leading a team is hard.
No he is just jewish that is literally why
I also think thry burned their bridges with TLOU2. It sold purely on goodwill (and probably still not as well as they hoped) and got blasted by users.
TLOU2 only sold 10m after sitting in the bargain bins for four years. They're definitely not making TLOU3 after that.
I feel like you underestimate just how stupid Sony can be when it comes to throwing good money after bad. It would be in character for them to make TLOU3 out of spite towards their supposed audience and be surprised to see it lose money.
They probably will, the TV show allegedly did well. I just expect TLOU3 to do even worse than TLOU2, and they'll probably try to keep the budget on the lower end of the AAA spectrum to account for that.
Viking muh mentals the game is a flop? Seems like it came out like 7 days ago. I obviously give 0 shits about it, but is it already looking like a failure?
The first game might have been a cute little AA experiment but making the second take a lot more to make and giving it the AAA treatment meant it will be judged by AAA standards which it cannot match.
LOL, LMAO evenHB2 is such a failure that even the graphics whores aren't praising it.
Imagine making consoles more expensive than ever to push hardware to appeal to graphicsfags, only for them to be uninterested in the slop
Exactly, graphics have made games more expensive and slower to produce than ever. The reason why everyone says that there are no games is because every game has to have the best graphics and that means half a decade of development. And graphics are a sucker 's game. They take a big amount of time and money, the end result might be realistic but not necessarily pretty to look at, you can only make them as real as reality and in a few years, everyone will talk about how bad they look. Just look at the first Gears of War: Once praised for its graphics and now everyone says it looks like ass. No pretty enviroments, only browns and greys. Better go the stylised art style route as then, the game will always look at least somewhat good. Cheaper and faster to make too.
It doesn’t help that every game pushing for hyper-realistic graphics just blends together in the memory. Easy example, it’s been… God only knows how many years, but I can still remember and occasionally want to replay Okami, almost solely off of its art style. Granted Weeb Shit also runs into “everything blurs together and looks similar”, just at the opposite end of the spectrum.
nah, people have been shitting on "brown and bloom" even back then, it was a notorious meme because everyone was using ue3 which made it look worse and started to ape it.
doesn't help "art style" these days is some cal-arts abomination, maybe dreamworks-smirk if you go 3d.
Say what you want about Weeb Shit but they at least try to make the game easy on the eyes. Better beautiful and same-ish than ugly and same-ish.
Aside from the bar of 'good graphics' getting higher and higher as the years go by, a big reason for there being 'no games' on PS5 is because the barrier to entry of game development has never been lower. If someone wants to make a game, team or no team, all they need is a PC with the right software and time to make it. Then they can just submit it to Steam or wherever for a price they think is fair and then just let it get played. That wasn't an option until the mid-2000s and PC gaming only started gaining momentum in the mid-2010s, which is right around when the console game selection started to get a little light.
