"There is already too much 'faggotry'": Pope Francis shuts down homosexual seminarians during bishops' assembly - The Holy Father and Italian bishops were gathered in general assembly to discuss the issue of homosexuality

L | A (translated with DeepL)

Trouble in heaven? No, in the Vatican. "There is already too much 'faggotry,'" these were the words Pope Bergoglio reportedly uttered during a closed-door meeting with Italian bishops gathered in general assembly to discuss the issue of homosexuality. Several national newspapers reported the news: confirmation also came to Il Messaggero, which listened to several sources.

The episode would date back, the conditional is a must, to Monday, May 20. Day on which the Pope met with the Italian bishops gathered for their spring assembly. An occasion when Bergoglio allegedly made it clear-during the hour-and-a-half-long meeting-that "homosexual persons should not be admitted to the seminary."

The meeting

In the closed-door meeting with the more than 200 Italian bishops that opened the General Assembly of the Italian Bishops' Conference last Monday in the Synod Hall, the Pontiff on this topic launched himself into very tight calls toward greater selection in access to seminaries, not without using even colorful terms and even pointing the finger - as reported by the website Dagospia, later followed by other media - at the excess of "faggotry."

The Pontiff's severe intervention on this issue, which did not fail to surprise those present, is confirmed by several sources. Thus, for Bergoglio, homosexuals should not be allowed in seminaries. From "who am I to judge" to a now much more trance-like position, if only regarding the selection and formation of priests. The issue has been debated for many years, and already an instruction from the Vatican's dicastery for the Clergy in 2005 - under Benedict XVI - confirmed in 2016 when it was Pope Francis, stipulated that "the Church, while deeply respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the Seminary and to Holy Orders those who practice homosexuality, present deeply rooted homosexual tendencies or support the so-called gay culture." The Italian bishops, for their part, at their last assembly in Assisi had debated the possibility of more nuanced restrictions, feeling encouraged precisely by Bergoglio's past openings on the issue of homosexuality.

Although amid much contestation, an amendment had thus been approved that merely distinguished between "acts" and "tendencies," reiterating the obligation of celibacy for all seminarians, homosexual and heterosexual, and thus opening the door of seminaries to gay candidates for the priesthood committed, however, to the option of celibacy.

But in the hour-and-a-half-long discussion with the prelates, in fact the Pope barred the way: so respect, yes, for the gay person knocking at the seminary doors, but placing firm stakes on access to prevent the homosexual who chooses the priesthood from ending up leading a double life, with all the negative consequences of the case. And to reinforce his opinion and be clear even with a joke, Francis would explicitly recriminate about the excess of "faggotry" in certain Italian seminaries
 
Just allow priests to marriage, you old asshole.
If anything is an useless vestige it's that.
Anglicans whether in the UK or Australia have had major issues with child sexual abuse. Men don't become pederasts because they've no women, they're that way inclined already. If they marry, they end up molesting their son. Greek Rite Catholic priests (say Ukrainian or the southern Italian Albanese Epharchy) are among quite a few who can marry.
 
Anglicans whether in the UK or Australia have had major issues with child sexual abuse. Men don't become pederasts because they've no women, they're that way inclined already. If they marry, they end up molesting their son. Greek Rite Catholic priests (say Ukrainian or the southern Italian Albanese Epharchy) are among quite a few who can marry.
I am not saying they become pederasts because they are not allowed to marry.
If priests are allowed to marry, together with the many other benefits, gay pedos would strive much less to become priests, reducing the amount of faggots and diddlers in the priesthood.
 
I am not saying they become pederasts because they are not allowed to marry.
If priests are allowed to marry, together with the many other benefits, gay pedos would strive much less to become priests, reducing the amount of faggots and diddlers in the priesthood.
The basic problem in respect of recent decades is that the ball was dropped (pun probably not intended) in respect of not admitting homos to seminaries, from at least the 50s. Homos in seminaries would eventually gain positions like deanships and would encourage homos, turn a blind eye to sexual activity, and discourage straight men. When after V2 vocations cratered, numbers were kept high by admitting highly unsuitable men who were hitherto rejected instantly. Honestly empowering seminary admissions staff with specific criteria would be far more efficient. If PF is serious, what already happens in places will become more widespread.
 
Just allow priests to marriage, you old asshole.
If anything is an useless vestige it's that.

There was a head priest at my family's parish that had a girlfriend and two kids. Everybody knew. They just kinda let it slide until they got a new one. I'm sure it happens more often then we think. But that was a straight relationship. Maybe if allowed to marry some priests might beard. But then they'd be taking it up the ass behind the back of both their wives and the parish.
 
toomuch.jpg
 
At worst I would've said "too much sissyness",
Either way, I find it hard to believe that the same Pope who was pushing gay blessings just a few weeks ago suddenly wants to crack down on gay priests.

All we have is a local newspaper in Italy quoting a few anonymous "sources" who claim he used a certain word with potentially disputed meaning/context.
 
Back