Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 23.5%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 31.0%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.6%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 87 32.5%
  • Total voters
    268
Red_Cap said:
I've been stewing on this a bit and IDK why it matters "what we saw" or "what we want to see".

The fact is Nick is on the backfoot because he has to run defense and damage control over what it was we saw, and that's not a desirable place to be.
Click to expand...
We aren't the ones looking at serious prison time for horrific crimes involving drugs, guns and child abuse.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Hellion, Me262PrinceOfTurboJet, Third World Aristocrat and 3 others
Balldo's Gate said:
The cooking streams Kurt does that are described in the LawTube thread are something else.

I will just copy and paste the images from the above post since they kind of say it all

Looking good:

kurteggs.png


Cooking in progress:
Click to expand...
Are those scambled eggs covered in... chunks of butter? WTF?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellion, Hubelublub, AwfulWillow and 2 others
Truly Rural said:
I don't remember exactly but isn't Vic's story all about how he use to be a party animal, sexual deviant, possibly into drugs (I don't know if he was) and then turned his life around? Somebody who knows Vic lore can confirm, but I'm pretty sure at least sex part was confirmed.
Click to expand...
There was some infidelity. He slept around when he was married to his ex Michelle Specht. Including the use of prostitutes. He also tried to consensually sleep with some fans (which is REALLY dumb, but not the sexual assault his critics claimed). He's admitted to all that (unlike Nick, who seemingly can't ever admit to shit).

He's imperfect, but his failings never got to the same level as Nick. Not even close.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: George Geef, Third World Aristocrat, Procrastinhater and 5 others
Retink Retunk said:
I can't fathom what he's aiming to accomplish with those streams, or trying to be a streamer at all.
Click to expand...
I guess he tries to do chill streams on non-legal topics, which is whatever, but he should probably stick to the gaming streams he does or anything other than this sub-Scalfani tier cooking.

Scuzzy said:
This seems unacceptable no matter what the context is. Kurt, kindly get the fuck off of the Internet immediately.
Click to expand...
He's been a streamer for years at this point, he has no excuse to not realize he needs to get away from the camera if he's going to rub something into his back like that.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Windy Moors, Procrastinhater, Douglas Mortimer and 1 other person
Retink Retunk said:
Cooking stream, originally posted in the Lawtube thread, same one where Legal Mindset had his weird ladyboy stream attempts posted. All of these fucks are weird.

Source:
Click to expand...
Lawyers are usually psychologically unwell. It's a stressful profession which attracts a lot of depressives, cluster Bs and outright sociopaths. The profession is also considerably worse than it used to be which turned a respected profession into what it is today. Personally, I don't regret my choice since I am an expert in my area of the law but I wouldn't recommend it to someone else since my psychological well being took a hit since law school being around these people.

Captain Manning said:
There was some infidelity. He slept around when he was married to his ex Michelle Specht. Including the use of prostitutes. He also tried to consensually sleep with some fans (which is REALLY dumb, but not the sexual assault his critics claimed). He's admitted to all that (unlike Nick, who seeminy can't admit to shit).

He's imperfect, but it never got to the same level as Nick. Not even close.
Click to expand...
Vic is just a well meaning but horny Mediterranean man. His kind built empires.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: George Geef, Cat Menagerie, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 13 others
The entire deal with these internet lawyers (I use this term loosely, most of them hardly practice and with good reason) attempting to conflate ethics and law is quite amusing to me for a set of reasons:

1. If you must make your personal set of ethics the word of the law, it tells me you're a dumb piece of shit.
2. If you must make your personal set of ethics the word of the law, you are giving the state the power to dictate your own ethics, sense of morality and right or wrong.
3. If you must make your personal set of ethics the word of the law, it means you must accept any judgments coming from the state without reproach, there can be no appeals, no wrongdoing on the hand of the state, you made the Law (and, by definition, the state) your God and follow it as such.

For a bunch of quote-unquote libertarians such conflation is flabbergastingly hilarious to make, particularly when the following cope is more or less "the state is wrong about how they proceeded with nailing Nicky because of facts I imagined in my head".

Now, it's obviously not the case that these imbeciles are replacing their own beliefs with "but law said so", or more accurately they aren't doing so internally but merely outwardly due to being too deep into the kool aid of sophistry. Attempting this, however, is the reason why to any sane and normal every day person these lawltube arguments sound fucking retarded, even if they can't quite pinpoint why.

All in all, seems to me like an attempt at having their cake and eating it too, law and ethics conflating only when the law is wrong (a scenario where his fourth amendment rights might have been potentially violated and it would invalidate the order, evidence and charges therefore nicky dindu nuffin, legally or morally), not when it's right is quite a leap to make when trying to checkmate a bunch of spastics in a forum.

Or, as people wittier than me have put it: Rent fucking free.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Oscar Winner, kokokrunch123, Al from Dadeville and 5 others
Balldo's Gate said:
The cooking streams Kurt does that are described in the LawTube thread are something else.



I will just copy and paste the images from the above post since they kind of say it all

Looking good:

View attachment 6027841

Cooking in progress:

View attachment 6027839
Click to expand...
Are those fucking slices of butter on the toast and eggs? There's like a full stick of butter on that plate total. Someone needs to put the butterdish on lockdown.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
Reactions: AwfulWillow, feral cat #6385, Windy Moors and 2 others
Kulee Baba said:
In hindsight it’s just hysterical, it’s not an unreasonable critique that Kiwifarms users sensationalize and assume the worst in our subject matter. But in this case we all thought way higher of Nick Rekeita.
Click to expand...
Remember, even when we were exaggerating for fun, we were saying it was modafinil/provigil or Adderall or something like that.

Well, we now know it was Scarface levels of cocaine. That's what reality turned out to be.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: George Geef, jerkstore, Cat Menagerie and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back