- Joined
- Oct 9, 2018
I think there's something missing from the timeline, something none of us know. Everyone is pretending that the cops broke down the door on the pastor's word, but I think it's clear they didn't. If the pastor's reporting alone caused the warrant, then why wait a week? The pastor's report merits a welfare check, not a warrant (based on what we know right now). Plus, the pastor's report presumably would bring CPS out, not the cops. I think there's something missing.Not sure if anyone posted the inverse of this "leak" of the sherrifs report from MELIN... The backside of the page states:
"
born in 2007 in charge. MELIN was unsure if that was standard or not.
MELIN advised that nobody told him an ...DETAILS.... possible neglect an/or drug use. There was
zero reports of any physical or sexual abuse and that the kids were not in any immediate danger at the
"
Why would a mandatory reporter report zero physical or sexual abuse and that the kids were not in any immediate danger? And why would they smash a door down?
View attachment 6028202
New projected timeline:
1. Pastor's report
2. Investigation begins
3. ???
4. Warrant and breaking down Balldo's Gate
I think it's at least possible that #3 ??? might be the ending of the appealstream, because the 3 p's (police, parents, pastor) certainly had the head's up to start examining Nick's streams.
OR, maybe the police have something EVEN WORSE, that we simply don't know yet. I strongly believe that the pastor's report alone would have resulted in a door knock from CPS or a welfare check from the cops, nothing more.