Opinion I’m a brown, Muslim European. For people like me, these EU elections are terrifying

Source | Archive


My inbox is inundated with messages telling me to use my vote in the European elections because if I don’t “others will decide for you”. My head agrees with the messages from EU politicians that I should do my bit for democracy. But for the first time, my heart isn’t in it.

As a European who is also brown and Muslim – and who has long wanted the EU “project” to work – I am terrified at the extent of power and influence wielded, inside and outside government, by politicians who are unashamedly racist, xenophobic and Islamophobic and whose vision of Europe – whatever they may say in public – is also inherently hostile to women, Jews and gay people. And I am worried that it is going to get even worse.


This is a sad and sobering moment for all progressive Europeans. For Europe’s Muslims and racial and ethnic minorities, it is a time of deep personal anxiety. Many feel betrayed and abandoned, not just by EU politicians and policymakers – they never cared much for us anyway – but by large parts of the media and EU “experts” who failed to see the dangers of a far-right Europe, played down the threat, or deliberately looked the other way. Even more painfully, many of our white friends and colleagues still cannot – or will not – understand that for us, all this is up close and personal, with a real impact on our mental health and daily lives.

Yet if they paid attention, they would see proof that racism is “pervasive and relentless” across Europe. Islamophobia is on the rise, as is antisemitism, both forms of racism exacerbated by the Israel-Gaza war. With the far right expected to hold even more power in the future and as the EU’s anti-racism action plan runs out of steam, such bigotry is going to get worse.

The fact that racism, discrimination and xenophobia are corroding European democracy from within, creating societal divisions and political polarisation, is rarely discussed in “Brussels so white”. Neither is the inconvenient truth that Europe’s centre-right and liberal politicians have openly or tacitly embraced the extremists’ political agenda and xenophobic view of the world.

It is a toxic view reflected in the EU’s new migration and asylum pact and Rwanda-style plans for sending refugees and migrants to third countries drawn up by the European People’s party, the political group that is home to Ursula von der Leyen, who is seeking a second five-year term as president of the European Commission.

Many EU governments have been clamping down on freedom of speech and the right to peaceful assembly of those who oppose the Israeli offensive in Gaza, prompting a warning from Amnesty International. The European Commission recently invited Israel’s foreign minister, Israel Katz – whose statements on Palestinians have been invoked at the international court of justice (ICJ) as proof of the Israeli government’s genocidal intent – as a virtual guest at a meeting attended by the commission’s vice-president, Margaritis Schinas, who is in charge of “protecting our European way of life”. Now we also have to worry about a “civilisational battle”. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, suggests that unlike other cultures, Europe has a “certain relationship with freedom, justice and knowledge”.

Any remaining doubts about Europe’s trajectory into once-forbidden far-right territory – or hopes that the drift could be magically derailed – should have been laid to rest by the formation of the new Dutch coalition by Geert Wilders. The “firebrand” populist may or may not act on his threat to close down all mosques and ban the Qur’an and the hijab. But he remains determinedly anti-Muslim in word and act.

I find hope in promises to construct a “cordon sanitaire” around newly elected far-right MEPs. But only on the left has there been clear reference to tackling systemic racism. What about also committing to making EU institutions more racially diverse and inclusive, and decolonising inward-looking and Eurocentric trade, aid and foreign policies? By ignoring such questions, many of these parliamentarians perpetuate the damaging disconnect between the predominantly white EU institutions and the reality of a vibrant, diverse and multicultural Europe.

Representation does not guarantee racial justice and we must be wary of diversity washing. Some of Europe’s most hardline anti-immigration politicians are not white. Wilders has Indonesian ancestry on his mother’s side, while his coalition partner, Dilan Yeşilgöz-Zegerius, leader of the People’s party for Freedom and Democracy, was a former child refugee from Turkey. Yet it is still striking that Black and brown members represent only about 3% of the current European parliament, reflecting political parties’ reluctance to put people of colour on their lists for the European elections. This erodes the legitimacy of EU institutions and in turn creates a vicious circle.

The Dutch politician Mohammed Chahim, who is one of the few MEPs of colour, tells me that given the lack of representation and non-white role models in Brussels, many young, well-educated and adventurous Europeans of colour either set up their own businesses, go to London or New York, or opt for “more impactful” – and relatively more inclusive – national politics.

Dealing with the EU is a special challenge for European Muslims. The Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations (Femyso), which brings together young people from across Europe, has not yet had a bilateral meeting with the European Commission’s new coordinator for combating anti-Muslim hatred, despite repeated requests. Femyso’s meeting with the EU commissioner for equality, Helena Dalli, in 2021 was criticised by the French government over unfounded allegations of Femyso’s links with the Muslim Brotherhood, a charge the organisation strongly denies. Dealing with the so much conscious and unconscious bias requires “emotional resilience”, a young Muslim familiar with the Brussels bubble tells me.

Still, many have not given up. Many Black and brown friends as well as members of Femyso and Diaspora Vote say they are enthusiastic about voting in the elections because they see it as their duty and responsibility to be part of the discussion. Things could be even worse otherwise. Their argument is much more powerful and convincing than EU policymakers and politicians’ bland platitudes about the importance of showing up at the polling station.
 
lol no it won't

If the time ever comes, and I doubt it will, that Europe decides to rid itself of Arabs, Africans, and other people who don't belong, they'll discover that it's almost trivially easy to identify who needs to leave, put them into boxcars, and ship them off somewhere else.



Who cares? What the fuck would any of those countries do if we started doing massive drop-offs of cargo containers filled with their countrymen? What's Pakistan gonna fucking do, sail their navy up to the English Channel and start bombarding the coastline?
The point being that you will out of necessity be exterminating these populations. The countries in question will refuse to receive their citizens back. No intermediary country will permit you to send the millions through theirs out of fear of ending up like Turkey with its millions of "temporary" Syrian refugees.

The only way this doesn't end in extraordinary violence is if the invading migrants can be convinced to leave of their own accords. If not, they would need to be destroyed.
 
It will be difficult to make the browns leave Europe. Their own nations don't want them back. You thought you were getting the doctors and engineers but you were really getting the wife beaters and the druggies. Kabul laughs as you take in their most inbred retards.
Mass deportations will never happen, these people make up 5%+ of the population in many European countries now and it's not feasible to charter tens of millions of deportation flights to some Crapistan that doesn't even recognise them as it's citizens and won't allow them to disembark.

If things do reach a flash point, any removal effort will involve rounding people up and sending them to camps.
 
If the time ever comes, and I doubt it will, that Europe decides to rid itself of Arabs, Africans, and other people who don't belong, they'll discover that it's almost trivially easy to identify who needs to leave, put them into boxcars, and ship them off somewhere else.
Why would it even take that much effort? Seems like just depriving them of free shit (other than a plane ticket back home) would be sufficient for most.

Anyone else see that recent story about an Afghan family of 11 bitching that their council flat isn't good enough?
 
The point being that you will out of necessity be exterminating these populations.

Which is not, strictly speaking, "hard."

The countries in question will refuse to receive their citizens back. No intermediary country will permit you to send the millions through theirs out of fear of ending up like Turkey with its millions of "temporary" Syrian refugees.

And what if we don't ask permission? Let's just say, hypothetically speaking, the UK decided it was done with Pakis, and that they were all going to be dropped off in Libya. So you load them up on shipping containers, ship them out, and drop them off on the coast. Libya doesn't have a functional navy. There's nothing they could do to stop it. I guess they could massacre all the Pakis as they step out of the shipping containers, but oh well, who cares?

None of it's hard, it's just about will. It's like when everybody was fretting about how it was "impossible" to stop NGO ships from towing boatloads and rafts laden down with Africans to Italy. Of course it was possible. You don't need 16" guns to sink boats of that size.

It's not a matter of material impossibility. The problem is nobody has the will to even stop them coming in the first place, let alone make them leave.
 
Why would it even take that much effort? Seems like just depriving them of free shit (other than a plane ticket back home) would be sufficient for most.
This brings us to the problem of the fifth columnists that permeate the western world. There is this maddening belief that welfare is a human right, especially for migrants parasitically living off of your country. You can't even begin to try to make migrants uncomfortable before you deal with the traitors amongst you. The bougie swine on the top of the pyramid are all too happy to flood your country with cheap labor/bodies to fill up housing/non-natives to destroy the local population in an effort to rule over the resulting shithole. There's even the real danger that the present ruling class' children genuinely believe in globohomo and its various principles (e.g. Alexander Soros, all the celebrities' children trooning out, pajeets ruling the UK). We're drawing somewhere close to the Russian Tsar or the French aristocracy's levels of debauchery, extravagance, and willingness to fuck over the peasants.

Wholly necessary background material to understand the modern elite:
 
>I'm brown
Stopped reading there.
1716929025520.png
 
I look at the "good" Muslims much like I look at the "good" Negroes: there is a sizable chunk of their demographic who are doing heinous, uncivilized, unacceptable, inexcusable things. Theft, rape, murder, assault, pedophilia...generally acting like animals. And the "good" ones who don't conduct themselves in that manner are remaining silent and inactive about it when they should be the loudest ones against it because it makes the "good" ones look just as bad as the "bad" ones by association. If the "good" ones continue to remain silent and complicit in the face of this savagery then they shouldn't be surprised or upset when the cultures hosting them get fed up with the lot of them and make moves to get rid of the problem. It was their home first, and you were a bad guest even if you didn't do anything the "bad" ones were doing.
 
Why are my race's homes a public toilet for you all, but your homes remain locked for anyone but you?
but your homes remain locked for anyone but you?
Depends on where she's from. The UAE, Dubai in particular, is happy to be a public toilet for "white" prostitutes of both sexes. We Russians can tell the type of relocant by whether it flees to Dubai (prostitute), ex-Soviet rat king lairs (common traitor), or you-know-where (traitor mastermind).
 
And what if we don't ask permission? Let's just say, hypothetically speaking, the UK decided it was done with Pakis, and that they were all going to be dropped off in Libya. So you load them up on shipping containers, ship them out, and drop them off on the coast. Libya doesn't have a functional navy. There's nothing they could do to stop it. I guess they could massacre all the Pakis as they step out of the shipping containers, but oh well, who cares?
Then "mass deportations" is a euphemism. If the political climate and the population's morals have reached the point where everyone is happy to effectively invade another country for the sole purpose of sending millions of people to their certain deaths, realistically we'd already be doing a large portion of the dirty work ourselves.
 
Always with the drama. I wish it was even as slightly as drastic as this and other cunts describe it, would really restore some hope in a better future. Nothing will happen to you as a mudslime no matter who is in charge in Europe, the normalization of all things brown is long complete.
 
Back