Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.7%

  • Total voters
    354
These "law" people dismissing the neglect and abuse of kids, once the footage gets shoved in their face, do not accept their apologies. They act in bad faith, and denied the information despite knowing it already. Only when there is no spin on it anymore will they "change their mind."

Fuck all of them. Especially the ones that are fathers.
Barns trying to get nick off calming the search warrant wasn't valid and ignoring the child abuse and neglect has brought me close to fed posting,
 
Pilpuling faggot Kike Lawgic should neck. His sweeping for Nick is off the charts:

"Oy vey, the kids didn't say they were hungry. All we have is a police officer saying a teacher said that."
"It's police framing a narrative. Do you really trust the cops, goy?"
"I'm not saying he's innocent, I'm just taking the police with six million grains of salt."
"The police report didn't mention the state of the children they found, so any neglect must have been remedied."
/sigh he's not nose guarding. They are discussing what the defense options are. They all seem to agree Nick is fucked, and his only hope is to plea into a program.
 
Looking at the evidence list, they found traces of strange substances all over the house, will these substances be examined by a lab seeing they were collected as evidence?
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Joe's not Baldowashing. He's playing devils advocate. And asking the source of each piece of information. He's basically saying Nick is fucked.
He's playing devil's advocate poorly since he's disregarding statements made in the search warrant and the incident report. Sounds like he's trying to still balldowash.
 
Would these places just let him tell them what they want to here, collect their checks, and let him go? I honestly don't know.

Most of them, oddly, wouldn't do that. Dunno about the ultra high end places, but the majority I've heard of (here and in the US) have staff that are actually committed to the job and the patients. It's a pleasant change in a way, but for Nick it's got a huge downside: They've fucking seen and heard it all, and they KNOW when someone is bullshitting them. They'll leave it alone for a time - but they don;t forget and they will dig.
 
In fairness, it’s still obviously clear all that happened because he was under the influence.
Yes, if you neglect your kids while in the course of being a degenerate amoral drunken cokehead, the state should give you a cookie and tickle your balls. Only 100% sober people should face serious consequences for their actions.

In fairness? Fuck off. In fairness, Nick is a piece of shit. Full stop.

Holy fuck Joe GoodLawgic on Nates stream -
Nate just mentioned kids weren't fed as per warrant doc thingy
Joe said - well what if the source of that information was Aaron Imholte, would that change your perspective? I don't know if that's what's happened but would it change how you think?

I LOATHE balldowashers
IIRC, the warrant application specifically stated that claim came from a teacher. She related what the kids told her.

Separately Aaron had the infamous Spegettios story, but I don't think they are relying on that. At least not exclusively.

Joe read the warrant application. Joe is a disingenuous fucktard.

In fact, I will say I now BELIEVE Aaron's Spegettios story because the church source seems to corroborate it.
 
Out of all the judges he could be assigned not only did he get one he has a bad personal history with but also one he just spent 30 minutes incoherently rambling about having vodka seep out of her vagina and being "touched by retardation."
it's a small rural county i don't think there are all that many judges he could be assigned.
 
What is this from? I must have missed this
It appears it's from Nick's congregation which livestreams every sermon on youtube. They cancelled the 26th livestream, they obviously know what's happening.


I'm thumbing through them looking for coked up Lady Rackets shaking her arms angrily for Jesus.
 
According to Sean in the Kino Casino Aaron tell-all stream, Judge Fischer does seem to have a personal beef with Nick causing one of his past clients to lost a case. Whether its justified with Nick being a narcissistic retard or not is unknown, but I believe Sean's opinion as he has no reason to defend Nick at this point.

To think that there’s a major problem here, or that a beef with the judge will mean a chance of success at an appeal is really retarded.

Let’s follow the logic here.

IF the balldowashers are right, and the judge needs to recuse herself because of some stuff Nick said, what’s the logical outcome?

Well, any time some niggo gets caught for an armed robbery or slinging dope, all he needs to do to get another judge and/or delay the trial for a while, is to go on to YouTube and insult the judge.
 
However, AFAIK, I think he's cleaned up that aspect of his life. I haven't seen a Flash drunk stream in ages.

I'm not saying Flash is great or anything, but HE pulled up.
Respect. Just clowning for clown's sake. Got nothing against 'im. I get where he's coming from in his videos... it's just shit I can't get worked up about. Thus it makes me laugh that Nick has fallen far enough he's getting sound advice from a culture warrior.
 
IIRC, the warrant application specifically stated that claim came from a teacher. She related what the kids told her.

Separately Aaron had the infamous Spegettios story, but I don't think they are relying on that. I At least not exclusively.
Correct. The claim of not being fed came from one of the 4 that talked to the pastor. Now, could the cop have seen Aaron mention the spaghettios story, sure. And that would only support the claim of the teacher. So while the claim doesn't come from Aaron, having a second independent source say the same thing would be interesting to the cop.
 
"Cheif Powder Nose. The idea that you were a good Christian family man is the most FANCIFUL legend of all! You came out of the Minnesota woodlands, tooted to the max, beset on your fellow man's wife!"
bury_my_heart_at_wounded_knee__2007_1046.jpg
 
I'm still trying to catch up on this thread, so it may have already been mentioned.

But I am guessing that the $3,000 a month on snacks the nanny was spending money on was probably actually meals. That Aaron guy mentioned the nanny left at some point (quit or fired). And that he was the one that was feeding the kids. Then when Aaron left. Perhaps it was a case of fend for yourselves.
Aaron, the Liar claimed that the $3,000 was actually the month's grocery bills, and the reason it was framed as snacks is because it was all ready-to-eat foods that didn't require someone putting together as a meal.
 
Back