Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 58 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.6%

  • Total voters
    355
They will come back and deal with it. The standard response is typically that children can't be trusted as witnesses and can't be trusted to evaluate themselves in matters such as hunger. That if they are not clean or wearing clean clothes that its a decision made by the child. These arguments don't tend to work well in the legal system.
Also a couple of his kids are women, and one wants to marry a boyband member but they aren’t catholic or Muslim. Would you trust someone who’s a child and even worse a women to tell the unbiased truth.
 
People who try to place responsibilities on kids are retarded. The 16 year old most likely only recently turned 16, if he gets a job who's watching the other 4? His parents got strung out before he could learn how to drive, get a job or take care of 4 other kids when he's a KID himself.
It's absolutely embarrassing that a bunch of so-called lawyers and legal experts are hinging this absolute circus show of a "defense" on entirely extralegal matters. Let's say the oldest kid (16, mind you) has a job, can drive, etc. None of that matters, because *by the letter of the law* parents have certain legal responsibilities to any children under their care that are under the age of 18. What they're saying is, children ranging from the ages of 6-16 are fully fit and capable of taking care of themselves and/or each other. Actually, that's not embarassing. That's fucking infuriating.
Does it really matter who the judge is? There's only three. Are the noseguards going to find a problem with all three?
No guarantees that they can or will, but I would put actual money on them trying their absolute hardest to do so
 
Lmao it’s like a jackhammer!

FYI: https://www.japan-talk.com/jt/new/why-you-should-never-shake-your-legs-in-Japan

Screenshot from 2024-05-29 20-47-15.png

Bimbo yusuri (貧乏ゆすり) is the Japanese term for shaking of the legs or knees while seated. The term can be literally translated "poor person shake".

Screenshot from 2024-05-29 20-47-44.png

It is highly recommended to avoid shaking your legs in Japan. According to Japanese manners leg shaking is extremely rude. It indicates that you're impatient or nervous about something and lack self control.

Edit: speling iz hard
 
My attorney and I are petitioning for the Rekieta omnibus hearing in August to be livestreamed. To help our motion, we need to demonstrate public interest. Please, respectfully sign my petition.

If you are an attorney willing to sign an affidavit of professional interest in seeing the trial but you cannot attend in person, please reach out to me by email or other means.

Damn nigga that's cold. I like it.
 
I thought this one was decent and to the point. Plus I recognize the guy as one of Nick's old advertisers, so that must mean something. Probably? Sequel video.
Jesus that fucking side by side with pictures of Balldo year by year really hammers it home how much he has fucked himself.
 
No guarantees that they can or will, but I would put actual money on them trying their absolute hardest to do so

If they want to put on some sort of crazy Barnes-style defense, their best and perhaps only hope is to get the case moved out of a small very conservative town and into someplace more liberal & more urban that is cocaine friendly and hates the police.
 
4-5 hours is not that unreasonable for a call like this, pretty standard really. Despite my retarded Rekieta tier math in my last explanation of the ORR process. Fifty hours total is not that far-fetched.

The supplemental report we just got says they found Nick on the way to the house, arrived at the house at 9:13 AM, and left for the jail by 11:05. So that's about 2 hours of operation footage, times the 10 officers, for 20 hours minimum. They'll usually keep the cams running until the prisoners are handed over in the jail, so add another hour for however many officers were in cars with prisoners, let's say 5, so about 25 hours for body cams. (I don't know if the CPS person they called would have a bodycam, I assume not.)

Taking a wild guess at dash cams, say 2 cops per car so 5 cars x 2-3 hours, so another 10-15 hours. A lot of that won't be interesting, but they still have to review it. I don't know if you get a discount based on empty video like that, or if the FOIA was broad enough to include dash cams. It should require less redaction than bodycams.

So it's 25-40 hours of footage, depending on parameters. Assuming that $3k price tag was a real estimate and not a "shut up and stop bothering me" number pulled out of thin air, that's $67-$120 per hour of footage.

Please clap send autism stickers.
 
If not before, certainly after issuing the search warrant, Judge Fischer should have recused herself, and handed any future hearings and the trial itself off to another judge.

Would you think it's fair that the same judge you had a professional conflict with, gets to judge your defamation trial, be the subject of your highly inflammatory invective & criticism, and then subsequently the same week as your criticism, issue a criminal search warrant for your house and person, and then preside over your criminal trial too?
There are procedures for a defendant to request a different court for his trail, and pointing out that you might have a conflict of interest with the judge would be a legitimate argument. It would be up to Balldo to bring that up, though.
 
Listen, the difference is, those kids who HELPED also had mom and dad doing most of the parenting. Also, those people saying that shit probably didn't have 4 siblings, it was likely just a 16 year old and a 13 year old hanging out together after public school while their parents were getting off of work.
nah man i had older relatives who were raised like that: daddy was out working from dawn til dusk, mom was handling the 7 children alone most of the time, without modern appliances. delegating some of the work and chores to the older kids was a matter of absolute necessity, otherwise there's simply not enough hours in a day to make ends meet. and this wasn't just about older teenagers, i'm talking stuff like the 9 year old is in charge of making the younger ones get up, get dressed, get breakfast, and get to school on time. in some rural places schools had holidays specifically so the kids could stay home and work all day when the harvest was being brought in.

in general kids can deal with a lot more hardship than what modern westerners give them credit for, they don't have to be fragile and helpless and incompetent unless they're raised to be that way.
 
a

at 49:40 from Nate's stream he starts with the whole "in defense of Nick" part, he acuses detractor of "being like CNN", he goes a little against the cops and then the whole kids thing

Thanks, it goes well with his other statement that "the neglect was remedied by the time of the raid":




Kids saying they're hungry are the equivalent of CNN and Fox News:
 
You'd be amazed how little the amount of range time a cop is required to put in to qualify.
Anyone who shoots as a hobby or especially in competitions is going to have way more range time than any but SWAT cops.
Plus being a good marksman is not a requirement for being a cop.

This was published 2 months ago, it was a testing course they did to specifically compare regular police and SWAT to competition shooters:
So, how did they do? And how did they compare to competitive shooters? Here’s the overall breakdown (in percentage of all 200 participants) of the police officer’s scoring ranges of classifications. Note, there is no bottom limit to Novice, which is defined as any score low enough (too slow) to make the Marksman cut-off.

Master: 0.5 % (19.18 seconds or less) - (Tirona)
Expert: 0.5 % (19.19 to 24.09 seconds) - (Tirona’s partner)
Sharpshooter: 8.8 % (24.10 to 29.92)
Marksman: 24.2 % (29.93 to 37.63)
Novice: 66.0 % (37.64 or greater)
Tirona also had a fellow police officer do this for his department which lacks a trainer of Tirona’s caliber. The results were:

Marksman: 27.3 %
Novice: 72.7 %
Nobody scored above Marksman
Finally, Tirona had a SWAT commander in a different department try this course with only the Emergency Response Team/SWAT members receiving more training than patrol officers. The results with the SWAT-only group were:

Expert: 0.6 %
Sharpshooter: 13.3 %
Marksman: 46.7 %
Novice: 33.3 %
To put this in perspective, the target at 10 yards has an eight-inch center (-0). Allowing 3 seconds for each presentation from the holster, 3 seconds for the reload, 1 second per shot for two hands, and 1.5 seconds per shot one hand will beat the Novice cut-off and make Marksman.

Competition Shooter Comparison

How does this compare to IDPA hobby and sport shooters? Some Event Directors have tallied the percentage of classifications for shooters attending their matches. An approximate consensus of their results:

Master: 3-5%
Expert: 11-14%
Sharpshooter: 27-29%
Marksman: 32-35%
Novice: 22-24%
Here’s the percentage breakdown of IDPA members overall, using SSP (Stock Service Pistol) as the base reference as it has the most participants:

Master: 4%
Expert: 11.3%
Sharpshooter: 27.3%
Marksman: 33.8%
Novice: 23.5%
Source
 
Back