State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
Likely Rumble or Odyssey though it would be funny if it was the Farms.

@Null Heya, is it possible to go back and see if we had some new, sudden users from Keniyohi county in the day following the stream?
Josh disapproved of graf doxing the approximate geoip of what he (correctly) though was Ralph accessing his instance. I don't have a huge problem with it, but I don't think he changed his mind on this. Although he has also talked about correlating accounts on here with admin-exclusive data. 🤷
 
It’s the swinging casino instead of Christmas with the kids and grandparents that is sus.

Nobody would blink twice if they went to see a movie. Even going out as adults and leaving the kids with grandparents is hardly remarkable except all the other stuff we know!
His moral situation is really much like the warrant, there are a bunch of facts that are neutral to bad in isolation but horrible when all lumped together.

I think his cope for hiring a bondsman is going to be "why would I risk my own money when the government is out to get me, I have to drink and travel to work".
 
Falsely reporting a crime has nothing to do with Nick lying about April. He wouldn’t be charged with that. It’s a stretch to imply he’d be charged with anything. It’s way too easy for them to say April was only staying there until she found her own place because divorce blah blah blah.
I didnt say he would be charged.

"or otherwise provides information to an on-duty peace officer, knowing that the person is a peace officer, regarding the conduct of others, knowing that it is false and intending that the officer shall act in reliance upon it, is guilty of a misdemeanor."

Nick did exactly that. Is there perhaps a more appropriate "lying to police" statute? Maybe, but I'm a mobilefag and dont give enough shit to dig for it. Temporarily living at the house until she gets a new place isnt just "visiting." He lied to the cops in the course of their investigation is the point of the matter, which is a touch different in the eyes of the law than bullshitting to your online audience.
 
Last edited:
Is posting Bond for Nick but not for Kayla his big brain move of dragging her under the bus.
Leave some coke unattended before she has to piss test, she snorts it, tests dirty and now has to depend on Nicky from inside the jail.
I think it's more that Kayla isn't going to have a seizure and die if she stops drinking for a week.
 
Plus she has her doctor-prescribed medications so she can continue to self-medicate and numb herself. She never struck me as a drinker (but I could be wrong)
In fairness to Nick, meeting conditions is tough when you have any kind of extra drama complicating your life, and an internet hate following that's documenting your every move and might start anonymously fucking with you irl definitely counts. I wouldn't want to be out on conditions in his position, even without the obviously crippling addiction issues we all know he's facing.

I'm surprised he had to go through a bondsman though, what a brokeboy thing to do.
 
It’s a shame we don’t have an insider source in the community.

I’d love to hear their take on things.
I think we have had either primary or one-jump-to-second-hand reports. Some of the info in the thread main thread, I don't know if it would have been found without boots on the ground.

I still can't believe this scumbag paid the 5k for himself and not his wife. Well, I guess I can, but it does make me wonder what's up. Especially since Kayla still has no representation listed. That smells like either a real case of serious gaslighting (likely), or a possible split (slightly less likely, but maybe Kayla did jump to her sister's place).
 
Consider that Nicholas Rekieta may not have had the resources to pool another $5,000 for his wife's bond.

Nick did not just post bond; he posted his $50,000 bond through a bond bail servicer. That meant he only had to put up probably only 10% of the bond or $5,000. It also took him almost an entire week from date of arrest.

If he had the money that many assume he has, he could have easily paid the $50,000 right away and without the leveraged assistance of a bond bail firm. He did not.

Instead it took him almost one week for....$5,000.
Maybe. Or maybe he intended to be a good boy for the duration and it took him a few days to realize just how much that wasn't going to happen.

I really really really really really don't want to believe that this man had to scrape the barrel for $5000.
 
Do we still not have the actual copy (PDF, not screenshots) of the search warrant results that everyone was streaming yesterday or did I miss it?

Sean had it in his stream last night.

Sean, post it. Use your mysterious user account to post it. (Just post it and say "I'm not Sean" so we know that it's definitely not you finally revealing your user.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cruisecontrol4cool
In fairness to Nick, meeting conditions is tough when you have any kind of extra drama complicating your life, and an internet hate following that's documenting your every move and might start anonymously fucking with you irl definitely counts.
Sounds like a very Nick thing to say. It's those goddamn Scandinavian incel prudes on the Internet having to erase all fun from the world that makes him unable to stay sober and in Minnesota. Now poor Nick can't even afford to get his wife out of jail.
Let's be real, most people's reaction is that of concern, especially for his kids. The only people who would pose any actual danger to him if he were to keep his nose clean and stop sperging out on socials and in random DMs are his psychopathic "friends" like Juju and Ralph.
 
Do we still not have the actual copy (PDF, not screenshots) of the search warrant results that everyone was streaming yesterday or did I miss it?

Sean had it in his stream last night.

Sean, post it. Use your mysterious user account to post it. (Just post it and say "I'm not Sean" so we know that it's definitely not you finally revealing your user.
That PDF is an amalgamation of the stitched together image on page 49 of this very thread, check the black bars on the side and the positions of the cursors to confirm.

As far as I can tell, only the YouTube channel Nobody likes Onions has the pdf, and the missing last part.
 
Do we still not have the actual copy (PDF, not screenshots) of the search warrant results that everyone was streaming yesterday or did I miss it?
Apparently it's an actual leak that wasn't supposed to happen, and our best field agents can't get it legally.

SOMEONE has boots on the ground!
 
Josh disapproved of graf doxing the approximate geoip of what he (correctly) though was Ralph accessing his instance. I don't have a huge problem with it, but I don't think he changed his mind on this. Although he has also talked about correlating accounts on here with admin-exclusive data. 🤷

Let's do this the slightly less autistic way.

Hey Mr Hardin I mean @Useful_Mistake can you ask your PD contact for clarification: which platform did the cop use to watch the deleted coke stream? "Journalists" and members of the public are naturally interested in any publicly available evidence on social media.
 
Back