Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.8%

  • Total voters
    337
Even at this very early stage, and even if hypothetically this goes to trial and Nick's side is successful in keeping a bunch of stuff out of the evidentiary record, I don't see a scenario where the prosecution is unable to convince a jury the cocaine was his, even if the 'reasonable' bar is set high on that count.
 
Last edited:
Yes, but I don't know where the bathing thing came in, that wasn't one of the allegations about the Rekieta kids. They were complaining about being hungry and wearing dirty clothes.
from the supplemental report. wearing same clothes for 4 days and starting to smell
cloths n smell.jpg
 
You'd think a fancy shmancy lawyer might at least be passingly familiar with the concept of constructive possession: https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/1975/44633-1.html


Now admittedly I'm no fancy internet jew lawyer like Good Lawgic, but even so I'm pretty sure I could argue the drugs being found inside a safe, inside his bedroom inside his house is good proof he was "exercising dominion and control over it".
Thankfully for Nick he didn't waive his right to remain silent and inform police that both he and his wife slept in the master bedroom. The prosecution has to first prove just who was exercising dominion rights. Coulda been April. Her credit cards were in there. Coulda been one of his kids for all we know!

Oh, wait...
 
Having illegal drugs at your home is an invite for people that don't care much about the law (Imholtes) and people who want to enforce it (the police) to barge into your home.
This is something I haven't seen many people talk about but keeping large quantities of drugs in your house is extremely risky. Not only from the obvious legal issues, but there are criminals out there who literally make a living off of stealing from dealers and high quantity users. This generally happens in a smash and grab style raid on the property, and they're often extremely violent.

Nick would actually have been a pretty good target for this, he lives in a rural area, his property is somewhat isolated and can't be seen easily from either the road or his neighbours, and Nick himself is an upper-middle class trust fund kid who's too strung up most of the time to properly aim a gun, or really do anything to defend himself. Had word gotten out in Minneapolis that the Rekieta's were moving large quantities of gear it wouldn't have taken much for someone with very ill intent to track him down, and God knows what could have happened then.

Had distant criminal relatives that would pull shit like this, also knew someone that got seriously fucked up in a drug raid carried out by dissident Republicans (Irish, not American), cause they had a lot of gear stashed at their gaff
 
Last edited:
WHAT THE FUCK AM I HEARING!?
View attachment 6037240
It's so bad for Nick that Tard Lawgic can't even keep his Story straight if something reasonable is said to him, so he's defending Nick despite knowing how bad it actually is. First he says that a 6 year old child should be expected to bathe themselves regularly then he agrees with Chrissie that children won't if you don't tell them to. So what is it now? How can you expect that a Child will do it if you know for a fact that they won't? Kinda like they need Parents to tell them since they can't properly understand the consequences of not keeping up hygiene yet.
 
Has any distinction been made between nose guarding and baldo washing? Seems so far the terms have been used interchangeably.

I'd offer that nose guarding is skirting around the issue- we don't know the actual state of the house, we don't know the actual state of the kids, we don't know what was going on with the drugs, we don't know what was going on with Aaron and April. Everything is just speculation and we have no hard evidence or facts truly established yet.

As opposed to baldo washing- Everything out there is a lie, Nick is being targeted by the government and the judge and the police, it's all a conspiracy, the kids could wash themselves and cook and clean, those damn church people are in on the govt. conspiracy because Nick dared to live a little, the Farms did this, etc.
 
It's so bad for Nick that Tard Lawgic can't even keep his Story straight if something reasonable is said to him, so he's defending Nick despite knowing how bad it actually is. First he says that a 6 year old child should be expected to bathe themselves regularly then he agrees with Chrissie that children won't if you don't tell them to. So what is it now? How can you expect that a Child will do it if you know for a fact that they won't? Kinda like they need Parents to tell them since they can't properly understand the consequences of not keeping up hygiene yet.
His argument boils down to this: OY VEY MESHUGGANAH! NICHOLAS IS A GUD FADDAH! I MET HIM SEVERAL TIMES AND I'M A GUD JUDGE OF CHARACTAH!
 
Thankfully for Nick he didn't waive his right to remain silent and inform police that both he and his wife slept in the master bedroom. The prosecution has to first prove just who was exercising dominion rights. Coulda been April. Her credit cards were in there. Coulda been one of his kids for all we know!

Oh, wait...
They could dust the box for prints. Do we know if it had a key or a combo? They can also subpoena his bank records so he better hope he paid cash for it
This is something I haven't seen many people talk about but keeping large quantities of drugs in your house is extremely risky. Not only from the obvious legal issues, but there are criminals out there who literally make a living off of stealing from dealers and high quantity users. This generally happens in a smash and grab style raid on the property, and they're often extremely violent.

Nick would actually have been a pretty good target for this, he lives in a rural area, his property is somewhat isolated and can't be seen easily from either the road or his neighbours, and Nick himself is an upper-middle class trust fund kid who's too strung up most of the time properly to aim a gun, or really do anything to defend himself. Had word gotten out in Minneapolis that the Rekieta's were moving large quantities of gear it wouldn't have taken much for someone with very ill intent to track him down, and God knows what could have happened then.

Had distant criminal relatives that would pull shit like this, also knew someone that got seriously fucked up in a drug raid carried out by dissident Republicans (Irish, not American), cause they had a lot of gear stashed at their gaff
Yeah I totally agree, he is a target if he’s known to be hauling around thousands of dollars worth of drugs in this day and age when people barely even carry cash and robbery hasn’t really dropped off.

But the worst angle I personally imagine out of the what could have beens in this case is that Nick continued staying up all night on drugs instead of sleeping, took one coffee pot to the face too many, and lost his shit with the AR right there under the bed.

Believe it or not, stimulant addictions aren’t known for making people behave rationally
 
Ok now lets compound that over years, like 5+ years. That's potential development issues.. Public schools would've done a better job than Nick and Kayla 100% AND wouldve fed the kids TWICE a day.
Not to mention the kids interacting with tons of other kids and how that helps them to develop not only social skills but rather how to act like a normal person in general.
 
Maybe I’m retarded but how is the prosecution going to not be able to prove this. I’m trying to pull a dr strange here and look at all possible futures and I’m not seeing one where this is the case. It was not only in there house, it was in a safe in their bedroom.
There is no way either one escapes conviction, unless on a technicality. It isn't illegal to use drugs. It is illegal to possess drugs.

The best thing both can do is to take the first deal given. The first deal is normally the least you will get on this type of case. Then, move on with getting life better for those kids. It will do no good to hold out on criminal case, do CPS stuff, and then get sentenced to prison.

Let's say the first deal is 6 months in jail. I know it could be probation only, but just go along. CPS will come give you your classes in jail. They can't give your kids back with you in jail, though.
 
Kids are capable of doing their own shit to a degree but an adult needs to at least facilitate an environment for that. Blaming the children is disgusting and anyone who unironically thinks they've got a "gotcha" blaming literal child victims, the youngest being SIX, deserves the rope (EVS, looking at you).
 
The issue is not whether the kids could heat their own spaghettiOs or not. I'm sure the 16 year old could shower on his own but it doesn't matter. The main problem here is that it isn't even remotely healthy for kids to grow up in an environment where Uncle Aaron and mommy are cuddling naked on the sofa while daddy is passed out on the floor and Aunt April is strung up on a BDSM cross. Drugs, sex and kids do not mix and that should be obvious to any adult with a semblance of a brain. Kids that are being raised by cokeheads and alcoholics are being neglected by definition. Kids shouldn't have to see that shit. Ever.
 
On the issue of young children and hygiene/bathing.

I've got kids and I would expect a child to bathe themselves even at 6 BUT never without some supervision. For starters, a bathroom can be a dangerous place, you can slip and hurt yourself. There's potentially medication kept there and of cause you can drown. Secondly, kids can make an ungodly mess. They can turn a bathroom into a swimming pool, use every towel and still be soaking wet. Thirdly, kids can just not wash properly.

The issue of supervision has no one size all solution. To quote Sargon, "it depends on the child". At 6 my kids where washing themselves but we ran the bath the door was always open and we always stayed around to make sure everything was okay. Now I don't live in a mansion so my bathroom isn't far away but in Nick's house, well anything could happen. I mean we are supposed to believe that the Rekieta's and Imholte's did coke, ket and had all kinds of sex without the kids knowing.

As for the house, kids make a mess but do you know who else does? Junkies. Are we supposed to expect the older kids and the 16 year old specifically to sweep it up for young children and 4 crackheads?
 
Back