Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
This retard erroneously says Nick has a conditional release in the first couple minutes. I get that he's not going to have any legal insight seeing as his claim to fame is "Turkey Tom's friend," but getting basic details wrong like that at this point is sad.

EDIT: He asks ChatGPT legal questions in the video. Lol.
Who the hell even is Turkey Tom? Is he Chicken Andy's older brother? It seems Sekturites are popping up like weeds in the last year or two.
 
Balldowashers are blaming the kids so mouthbreathers like Anna can get offended when people respond regarding them. The headline is how a white bread ass nigger thought he was big time and brought an ounce of coke to where his kids sleep while he watched the mother of his children get passed around like a blunt. Everything else is just damage control and cope to deflect from his failure as a man and as a father.
View attachment 6038510
View attachment 6038511
Fuck this black and white thinking. Rekieta and Aaron can both be reprehensible at the same time, Aaron being a scumbag has no positive effect on Nick's character. Balldowashers are so disingenuous that there's really no point arguing with them, even if Nick gets jailed it'll be a conspiracy, or if we see footage of their crack den they'll claim it's just so hard to keep a family of 5 clothed and fed.

I think these people are just morally evil and use language as a sandbox to justify their beliefs. Any sane person takes the side of the kids who were clearly in an unsafe environment no matter how you interpret the evidence.
 
Last edited:
Some retard defendant shit talks the judge = The judge has a conflict of interest
I guess it's a conflict of interest to not want to be squeezed for your vagina-liquor. US law is so confusing. :stress:
Complete insanity.
Pretty evident that lawltube is just looking for anyone to pin Nick and Kayla's behavior that isn't Nick and Kayla.
Im curious if the nanny knew anything. I find it difficult to believe all this happened after she left, which leads me to wonder why she never spoke up.
Others have brought it up, and I also mentioned it a couple hundred pages back, but Nick might have made her sign NDA's. Honestly isn't out of the realm of possibility. No idea if she would have signed it or if it would be legal to do so, but how Rackets' been the last couple years I wouldn't put it passed him.
He's literally using the kids in a PR war. It's honestly fucking disgusting. He doesnt care about them, but by god will he use them as a shield.
Nick going from Nigger levels to Palestinian levels, using his kids as shields.
 
Robert Barnes & David Freiheit continue to make Nick's case of cocaine possession, & child neglect, into a Constitutional issue:
View attachment 6038297

View attachment 6038299

I do like David saying "Always bet on Barnes" after his less than stellar record in the Rittenhouse trial, or the Alex Jones trial:
View attachment 6038298

That is to say nothing of when Barnes implied he was representing Nicholas Sandman. To which the kid, himself, responded & asked him to stop lying:
View attachment 6038312
Ok, take away the money aspect and then how is Nick different from any nigger who does drugs to the point that their kids are hungry, dirty and left to their own devices?

I hope these "lawyers" will defend every dindu with the same vigor.
 
Let's not forget, Ketamine is used as a horse tranquilliser. Yikes.

Its also used medically on humans in situations where there is a need for pain control or anesthesia where nothing conventional will work. I think the most common case is on people with severe burns. Its big advantage over other things is that it can disassociate the mind from the body but not mess with breathing or the other potential risks of normal anesthesia.
One use is in severe large burns where you have to keep doing frequent wound care and changing bandages on the person.

But there are consequences with using it medically. The worst is that it can cause flashbacks in some people.
 
Jesus he really has devolved. It's like he drank from the wrong grail. View attachment 6038645
wasted.PNG

He really has
 
You just know that Nick is talking to his balldo washers behind the scenes, so it's noteworthy to think that attacking Nick's children seems to be the best way of getting on Nick's good side. Considering Nick seemingly blamed the children and their activities at his arrest he likely blames them for being party poopers.

"Your Honor, this case isn't about 'drug possession' or 'child neglect'... it's actually about the ethics of freeloading six year olds"
oie_JXl62PpCH9jE.png
 
Fuck this black and white thinking. Rekieta and Aaron can both be reprehensible at the same time, Aaron being a scumbag has no positive effect on Nick's character. Balldowashers are so disingenuous that there's really no point arguing with them, even if Nick gets jailed it'll be a conspiracy, or if we see footage of their crack den they'll claim it's just so hard to keep a family of 5 clothed and fed.

I think these people are just morally evil and use language as a sandbox to justify their beliefs. Any sane person takes the side of the kids who were clearly in an unsafe environment no matter how you interpret the evidence.
Anna’s entire argument and faux moral grandstanding is that Aaron is inflicting harm on the kids by telling other people what they went thru. That they might be more traumatized by seeing words about their lived experiences than they were by actually living thru it. Using that rationale would also mean the witnesses that spoke up and ultimately got them out of that situation are comparable to Nick in harm caused to them. Nick inflicted that on them, the words of a guy that made them spaghetti-os which they haven’t seen in over a month pales in comparison.
 
Last edited:
Damn freeloading kids! It's their fault Nick didn't do the 14 locals streams!

Wine Aunts, Locals (a website) v. 6 year old

edit

Youtube recommended this to me just now. Wonder if she regrets giving him that painting knowing what he became.
View attachment 6038719
Someone in one of the balldo threads said apparently each bottle represented a different family member. That's some Dorian Gray shit if true
 
Back