Artcow SamanthaPrater / EruzaArto / DefyingGravityAgain / Emily Nicole Cassidy / Willowtheway / Uniloax - Special Ed Art Thief and "Big Bonned" Attention Whore; Perpetual Liar; Cucumber Princess; Negligent Animal Abuser; Twice Investigated for Murder

Catgirls are Love said:
Taking an axe or sledgehammer to the gateway is a perfectly acceptable alternative.
Click to expand...
How the hell is she going to afford an axe or sledgehammer when her monthly tugboat is needed to buy junk food and core subscriptions for strangers?

SamanthaPrater said:
I'm being treated like a criminal for not knowing everyone in the art community. :| that's not right.
Click to expand...
It's actually quite right. Art communities are pretty chill overall and you did the one thing that was so obviously offensive that it pissed everyone off.
Theres also your general screeching and being annoying so that doesn't help your case.
aaaaaand the long laundry list of awful things about you but we've already gone over that...multiple times.
 
SamanthaPrater said:
What part of "An idiot put me here?" do people not get? lol I didn't have a choice, and I don't take things laying down when people make false claims about me, I WILL stand up and stand my ground.
Click to expand...
Listen mate, you do have a choice. In situations like this you have 2 options, ignore, or respond. I can tell you from experience, ignore is usually the better option.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Not a bee, manic dainty gorl and Titan
SamanthaPrater said:
What part of "An idiot put me here?" do people not get? lol I didn't have a choice, and I don't take things laying down when people make false claims about me, I WILL stand up and stand my ground.
Click to expand...
An idiot made a thread about you, they were rightfully called a faggot then you showed up and lurked for who knows how much using @Defyinggravityagain before deciding that you wanted to sperg as @SamanthaPrater and it's been all downhill from there. Is this your kink?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Sparkletor 2.0, Titan and manic dainty gorl
SamanthaPrater said:

Like this art for instance, there's no reference to L's work what so ever yet people think I am copying L in this drawing when there's a video to provide accurate proof that I didn't have L's work up at the time of drawing my Christmas themed art.

we just both work with Disney so it was bound to happen that two people draw similar to one another.

I am NOT claiming to be a talented artist and I am not claiming "God Tier." either.

I JUST want to be treated as an up coming artist and to have common human decency.

if you notice on the video it says it was streamed live.

I apologize to L for the drama, I don't steal their work.

No. that's not true either, if I didn't credit a reposted art and should've, I apologize for that, I just never intentionally traced or referenced someone 's art. I have been filming prior to this which people didn't pay attention to.

If I reposted with out permission I apologize, I never meant any harm towards it. I just liked their artwork.
Click to expand...
The image you are showing in that video looks a little too much like the one that Lamby uses on her channel, for her banner and profile photo.
1717296516083.png

Lamby's image
1717296588157.png

Emily's image

There is way too much resemblance here to be a coincidence. Been doing some tracing again, over there, Emily?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Cryptosporidium 136, Not a bee, Trombonista and 2 others
Man In A Dress said:
Don't be silly. Age play is her thing, remember?
Click to expand...
I dislike you immensely for reminding me that this is a thing she's done in addition to her very passionate defense of a convicted pedophile. But given how she keeps getting her intellectual teeth kicked here in but always returns and says "Please Kiwis, I'd like some more" it's a not unreasonable assumption.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Not a bee, Sparkletor 2.0 and 1 other person
AnAnonymousLolcow said:
Listen mate, you do have a choice. In situations like this you have 2 options, ignore, or respond. I can tell you from experience, ignore is usually the better option.
Click to expand...
I just wanted to defend what was rightfully mine, and I am being treated as though I am a criminal. :| had I ignored they would've continued harassing me on their sites and they would've come after me as they did. they aren't innocent here, I have them blocked on all sites that I am able to do so with, and they STILL blog or screen capture my stuff, which means they are using an alt to do so with.

I was a child when I took that art work and I am sorry for doing so, truly meant no harm.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Markass the Worst, Not a bee, manic dainty gorl and 1 other person
SamanthaPrater said:
I just wanted to defend what was rightfully mine, and I am being treated as though I am a criminal. :| had I ignored they would've continued harassing me on their sites and they would've come after me as they did. they aren't innocent here, I have them blocked on all sites that I am able to do so with, and they STILL blog or screen capture my stuff, which means they are using an alt to do so with.

I was a child when I took that art work and I am sorry for doing so, truly meant no harm.
Click to expand...
Listen mate, I experience the same crap as a fellow Lolcow, and I learned that they will NEVER stop harassing you unless you leave the Internet, and since literally everyone nowadays has a internet addiction, the harassment will never stop.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: everybody in Portugal, Pedophobe and Not a bee
Sparkletor 2.0 said:
Replace the Mona Lisa. I dare you
Click to expand...
Okay, let me correct my statement: CURRENT artwork can be replaced as long as the person is alive and well. Old one's CAN be simi duplicated; how else do you think they get them into movies etc?

it CAN happen and techniques can be mimicked. In the movie 2012, there is a scene where they replace the Mona Lisa with a fake one.

It CAN be done.

https://2012movie.fandom.com/wiki/Paris I cannot find the exact clip but the point I am trying to make is on their wikipage.

it CAN be duplicated.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Markass the Worst, Trombonista, Catgirls are Love and 1 other person
SamanthaPrater said:
Okay, let me correct my statement: CURRENT artwork can be replaced as long as the person is alive and well. Old one's CAN be simi duplicated; how else do you think they get them into movies etc?

it CAN happen and techniques can be mimicked. In the movie 2012, there is a scene where they replace the Mona Lisa with a fake one.

It CAN be done.

https://2012movie.fandom.com/wiki/Paris I cannot find the exact clip but the point I am trying to make is on their wikipage.

it CAN be duplicated.
Click to expand...
Ahhh yes, ok. Very interesting. So what I'm learning from this is you are WillowTheWay and an art thief. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst, Pedophobe, Not a bee and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back