Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.9%

  • Total voters
    336
Whether or not it's her fault, the fact that there's a chance she could make biased decisions based on her personal feelings makes sense to me. Why isn't Balldo right in this case?
I think for conflicts of interest it’s important that judges and attorneys care about actual conflicts and perceived conflicts. What’s sad is that legal professionals have lower standards than CPA’s when it comes to conflicts. In the Trump case: the judge and prosecutor clearly had a bias and perceived conflicts of interest. In this case with Nick: the judge didn’t make any statements or show any sort of prejudice towards Nick. She just didn’t agree with his arguments. I think it’s good that a judge cares about perceptions of the public, even if they’re inaccurate.
 
It's hard to look at this picture and think that the whole of the Trad Catholic Dad thing was a complete larp. I just don't think Nick had any sticking power. After he'd qualified, I bet he assumed that he'd be making big money as people beat a path to his doorstep. He had no idea that it was going to be a fucking grind, long hours for low money. Given that, it's not surprising that the life of an online celebrity turned his head.
As retarded as Nick is, I don't even think he was retarded enough to think a degree from a TTTT dogshit law school that takes anyone with a pulse would let him make "big money". A pretty good (but not 100% accurate) barometer for how many of a law school's grads can make "big money" is the % of grads who end up at law firms with over 100 attorneys or in a federal clerkship. That % for his law school is 4.375% https://mitchellhamline.edu/careers...24/04/EQSummary-105-04-26-2024-16-05-22-1.pdf

Don't forget most of these grads end up in Minnesota, where the average pay, even among law firms with over 100 attorneys, is way less than what you'd expect in the "major" US legal markets like NYC, DC, LA, Chi, SF, or even "secondary" markets like Miami, Houston/Dallas, Seattle, etc.

He probably couldn't even get a shitlaw doc review job as an average graduate (no academic honors) from a bottom tier law school, so the online celebrity life gave him a taste of something he could never have otherwise. I guess once the money started to dry up, he needed to get dopamine hits from something a little more physical.
 
her but she's definitely vastly different from the woman he married.

She’s almost two decades younger in the wedding picture my guy.

I know it’s shocking, but women around 20 tend to be at the peak looks wise.

Then if you look at Nick, holy fuck what a vast improvement.

And tend to peak later than women. Especially if you don’t solely go for ab tightness

.
I can see from a weird sexual deviant's point of view why Nick might have thought that way.

Put down the bottle buddy. Wedding day Kayla=cute. Chubby Kayla=cute. Pregnant Kayla=cute. Late era Milf Kayla=cute. Arrested cracked out Kayla=Eh… Anyways.

But I kind of see why when he's a few shots deep he might say those disgusting comments. It doesn't make him not an ass hole

You gotta remember to give your unfiltered opinion on these matters to the women in your life! Women love honesty and the unvarnished truth, and telling them like it is: “Your vag is gross I’m not going down on you!” Will only make them respect you more.

Don’t listen to cucks who tell you otherwise!
 
Ricky Rackets Rail King - pull up
--- lyrics ---

Warning..
Pull up, pull up...
Streaming live like you're some kind of star
White lies, powdered highs, you've gone too far
Kids watchin’ wide-eyed, ain't that bizarre?
Behind the screen, you've got a real scar
Told you there's danger, but you brushed it aside
Narcissistic mind, can't see what's implied
Falling down the rabbit hole, your lies don't stop
Chasing shadows, rising to the top
Followers fooled by your electric charm
But there's no hiding from the cold, hard alarm
Now the sirens blare, and the masks are off
Living in a house of cards, all your bluffs are caught
Pull up, pull up

---

View attachment 6050909
Holy fucking shit this belts.
It reminds me of early AIC.
Layne would have killed this.
 
did I miss some drama?
1717441291498.png

1717441381444.png
1717441409830.png
1717441451433.png
(Page 5029)

1717441906990.png
(Debate Thread)

1717441527148.png
@Procrastinhater did a Mortal Kombat fatality on his ass

EDIT:
1717441820910.png
Even Barnes thought Brochacho was a disgrace to the Constitution

If he just made one disagreeable post and you got him thread banned that's pretty gay and doesn't help the "We aren't an echo chamber" argument. I'd recommend people not do this in the future, and that Jannies not entertain it, unless they actually start to shit up the thread.
Fyi he made several posts with the intention of derailing the thread.
 
Whether or not it's her fault, the fact that there's a chance she could make biased decisions based on her personal feelings makes sense to me. Why isn't Balldo right in this case?

My guy… This is bullshit. If this was the case, anyone who wanted a different judge could just shittalk their judge and go: “Welp, judge might be biased now!”

Potential bias comes with the territory, and as a professional, judges are supposed to set it aside.
 
It wasn’t even like a “funny” insult aimed at her. It was just stated as a fact, that once a woman had those five kids… Leaving slippery Nick just enough room to say: “Wha?! I didn’t say that about YOU!”

I thought he did say it about Kayla specifically. That's how I remember it at least.
He's so terminally online he can't stop blabbing online.

It's extreme Ralphamale energy to keep oversharing despite it being a clear act of self harm.

View attachment 6050627


:story:

Ralph and Rekieta have a lot of striking similarities but maybe the biggest one is just being consumed by wanting to own the a-logs. Their attitude and decision-making is totally hijacked by simply wanting to show the haters they're wrong.

It would be stupid beyond belief if Nick or Lady Rackets let this go to jury trial rather than taking a plea deal.

So yeah, probably.

Part of me has been wondering if the state will drag their feet then eventually drop the charges like what happened with Chris chan, because they don't want to deal with the circus. I don't think so, but it is uncanny how lolcows seem to always weasel out of consequences, every single time.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
A sampling over time. The photo with the redacted kid in it is from 15+ years ago and I really wish you could see the kid's expression. He's staring at her breasts with a wide-eyed expression of surprise or horror.

Edit: you're welcome, @Fapcop


View attachment 6050615View attachment 6050622View attachment 6050630View attachment 6050620View attachment 6050635View attachment 6050644View attachment 6050638View attachment 6050663View attachment 6050669

Stop posting old photos. I don’t want to start feeling sorry for these two nerds.
 
I looked up some news reports about him and drug cases. Most of the cases were trafficing cases, but he doesn't seem to go light on drug offenders. Out of the frying pan into the fryer Nick.
lmfao that won't help him. that judge was just ignoring all his sovereign citizen shit he was trying to pull in the room. He seems no nonsense I am dying at the thought that he just made things worse for himself.
Oh man, it's just getting worst for Nicky boy. :story:
This fucking drunken retard is going to get raped in court. And all of his dick riders will only be able to cope and seethe.
I’m sure the Judge he had removed for no reason is pleased she was removed from the case considering she is still the Judge of his lawsuit. Great job, always corner and badger the judge in an elevator and then later file a motion heavily implying she is unable to be impartial in a court case. I’m sure she won’t hold that slight of her character against you. You better hope she is impartial and you kicked her for no reason or she isn’t and now has even more of a reason to decide against you versus Montagraph.
 
Part of me has been wondering if the state will drag their feet then eventually drop the charges like what happened with Chris chan, because they don't want to deal with the circus. I don't think so, but it is uncanny how lolcows seem to always weasel out of consequences, every single time.

Doubt.

Chris had the tard card, and it was just a shitshow with two close family members, both mentally unfit to a certain degree.

Shit, the law he was charged under wasn’t even made with that kind of incest in mind, because why the f would anyone want to fuck their own mother.

So they basically scratched their heads, trying to figure out how to handle this clusterfuck, until time basically ran out.

Rekieta in comparison is a simple neglect/possession case.
 
How the fuck is this white bread ass nigga going to teach English when he can't even speak it properly? Most of his vocabulary consists of drunken mumbling and foul incomprehensible imagery of judge's vaginas! :story:
Nick is going to end up in one of the compilations of teachers being arrested at school for being drunk: like this one.

 
Perhaps my account is still too new to say such a thing, but I'm really getting bored of these new accounts popping up in here all the sudden, and seemingly do nothing except try and shit up this thread with the absolute worst takes ever.

It's one thing to disagree with the dog piling on one guy, and that's fine I guess, but the retardation it takes to say that everyone here would also do cocaine and abuse their kids if they had any kind of fame or money? That's not "I disagree with you", that's just brain damage talking.

It seems like almost every day now, it happens at least once. I have personally taken the stance of just not replying to them at all, because I know they will eventually just go away, whether it's because they get bored of being an idiot and move on, or they get the boot, so replying to them just acknowledges their time here as worth something. I haven't personally reported anybody for shitting up threads, but it seems like others do, and I think that's the correct approach.
 
I’m sure the Judge he had removed for no reason is pleased she was removed from the case considering she is still the Judge of his lawsuit. Great job, always corner and badger the judge in an elevator and then later file a motion heavily implying she is unable to be impartial in a court case. I’m sure she won’t hold that slight of her character against you. You better hope she is impartial and you kicked her for no reason or she isn’t and now has even more of a reason to decide against you versus Montagraph.
I think people overstate the degree to which a judge is likely to be biased. It varies of course, but from what I've seen of court footage and read of judgements, it seems like you have to be genuinely pretty autistic about legal ethics to get on the bench. Ask for a change of judge from one you're currently before in a separate personal case, before any pretrial momentum has had time to build up? Seems reasonable. I'd bet the most he's ever annoyed her was when he potentially implicated her in ex partee communication with the elevator incident and even then, as I understand it the case was already over when he did that.
 
Perhaps my account is still too new to say such a thing, but I'm really getting bored of these new accounts popping up in here all the sudden, and seemingly do nothing except try and shit up this thread with the absolute worst takes ever.

It's one thing to disagree with the dog piling on one guy, and that's fine I guess, but the retardation it takes to say that everyone here would also do cocaine and abuse their kids if they had any kind of fame or money? That's not "I disagree with you", that's just brain damage talking.

It seems like almost every day now, it happens at least once. I have personally taken the stance of just not replying to them at all, because I know they will eventually just go away, whether it's because they get bored of being an idiot and move on, or they get the boot, so replying to them just acknowledges their time here as worth something. I haven't personally reported anybody for shitting up threads, but it seems like others do, and I think that's the correct approach.
It happens when threads get to normies.
They come in, make an account, post retarded shit, get threadbanned and go back to Reddit.

I reallllllly want Nick to livestream soon.

Also that song posted a bit ago is fucking amazing.
 
Last edited:
these people are not the sharpest tool in the shed :story:
View attachment 6050572View attachment 6050573
Fucking retarded swines. Making fun of people saying “won’t anybody think of the children” is funny when it’s people crying about sex on tv or violent video games, but you can’t say it when it’s about severe child neglect and abuse, because yeah, won’t someone please think of the children?

Literal balldo licking niggerfaggots just repeating buzzwords without understanding the meaning and context. It’s the equivalent of making fun of someone upset at a child rapist by going “won’t anyone think of the children!111 lol fucking retarded christcuck moralfag”
 
Fuck me, those pictures are absolutely heartbreaking. Particularly the picture where he's holding up his law licence while standing next to his pregnant wife. It's so full of latent promise. They look so fucking happy -- as though they've just climbed a mountain of struggle and reached the top, and everything is going to be gravy from here on in.

It's hard to look at this picture and think that the whole of the Trad Catholic Dad thing was a complete larp. I just don't think Nick had any sticking power. After he'd qualified, I bet he assumed that he'd be making big money as people beat a path to his doorstep. He had no idea that it was going to be a fucking grind, long hours for low money. Given that, it's not surprising that the life of an online celebrity turned his head.

View attachment 6050777
I don’t think it was so much the life of a e-celeb but being able to sit at home with all his bills paid thanks to a trust fund. All that time to fuck around online because he really had no real financial pressure or worries let him devote all his time to fucking around, and eventually finding out, online.

The psychological cushion of a trust fund’s extremely big safety net sounds great, but I think the entire reason Nick could not handle an adult job/ career is due to not ever really having to do it. It’s an ambition killer. When he actually did find the “perfect job” via lawtube streaming he couldn’t handle it because he had never had to handle any challenge or responsibility, long term, his entire adult life.

A decade of grinding a not-ideal job would have allowed him to appreciate the lucky lawtube break and not fuck it up, less he have to return to some grind. All Nick had to worry about by blowing off his lawtube stuff was returning to the stree-free life of living off a trust fund.
 
Kayla and Nick filed a "notice to remove" Judge Fisher.
View attachment 6050080
View attachment 6050081

Credit to @Useful_Mistake for posting these documents in the State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta thread.
To be fair, I think they have the right to change the judge considering how much bad blood Nick had with her previously. There's a argument to be made that is impossible for her to be in impartial with at this point. But it's still funny as fuck. I imagine a drunk Nick writing a document, detailing the liquor that comes from the judge's vagina.
 
Last edited:
Back