State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[mindlessobserver]

It's nothing about taking anything personally, it's about him being a grifter, which he always has been. It's not any more complicated than that. This is something that is very obvious.

Well yeah, that went without saying. I'm not bothered about grifting. That's a thing. I'm more annoyed about his insinuation Mindset is in with Pedophiles and then lumping the forum in with that.

There is grifting, and then there is bad mouthing people for no reason other then that you are mad at the internet. I'm also annoyed that every time there is a Gay Op or Swatting the Farms gets blamed when the shenanigans probably emerged off of Discord or some other small in group of professional shit stirrers

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

It seems to me that Nick is NOT excluded under the felon status (he is not [yet] convicted), BUT he is excluded under the user of controlled substance status.

If I am reading your proposition correctly that is incorrect.
Federal law prohibits you from possessing/using an illegal substance and a firearm at the same time, but you have to be convicted. Nick is under indictment (and not formally convicted) and thus depending on the federal circuit and state law, he is disqualified from having a firearm/ammo in his procession and buying. This is a "tack-on charge" where they throw at you with the possession of a controlled substance charge. You don't get this without a drug charge first.
18 USC § 922 (g) (3) and (9). Bolded emphasis mine.

[It shall be unlawful for a person] who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));

to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

18 USC § 922 (n), as shown below only writes that it is unlawful for someone under indictment to ship or transport a firearm or ammunition in interstate commerce, not possession.

(n)
It shall be unlawful for any person who is under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce any firearm or ammunition or receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

I believe the Biden admin has made Form 4473 a requirement for gunshows now, but double check me on that.

They expanded the FFL requirement of "engaged in the business" to anyone who makes a profit and the gunshow thing is anyone who is registered at the show now (previously you could get a booth and be all private sale). Right now nobody, including the ATF knows what the fuck that means. Which means someone and their dogs will be shot as a sacrifice to the almighty state.

The form only applies to a purchase from a firearms dealer. He could legally obtain a firearm privately and I don't think he'd be violating anything unless he keeps it in the same house as drugs again. That would be unwise.

No, the general state requirement of a private sale is that the seller in good faith believe the buyer is legally allowed to own a firearm. So if Nick tries to buy something from some Scandiavian prude in his church, they would have to decline since they knew he got arrested and suspected him of being high on crack. Also in addition MN has bullshit transfer restrictions where you must inform the local police department of a pistol/"assault weapon". MN statue 624.7132.

Except as provided in this section and section 624.7131, every person who agrees to transfer a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon shall report the following information in writing to the chief of police of the organized full-time police department of the municipality where the proposed transferee resides or to the appropriate county sheriff if there is no such local chief of police:

 

[Leroy Washington]

Whatever CPS does will result in something in family court that probably will be mostly or entirely nonpublic. If it's separately criminal, they can file a separate case or just add it to the current one.

For instance look at the Nick Bate case. CPS was apparently doing nothing for quite a while. Then they sent him a letter saying their investigation was closed. Nick celebrated and gloated. A couple days later he was hauled off to be tried for his actual crimes, since CPS can't prosecute crimes. It's an administrative agency.

All it proves is she provided credit cards to be used as drug paraphernalia. It doesn't prove she was in possession of any particular amount, or even that she personally participated. And Minnesota legalized possession of such material. Pretty much anything that is used to consume drugs can be characterized as "paraphernalia."

Sending him a letter saying the case is closed is normal, the investigation itself has to end asap. The rest of it I seriously doubt is over. Also, in FL at least, it's Juvenile court, not family.

 

[AnOminous]

Sending him a letter saying the case is closed is normal, the investigation itself has to end asap. The rest of it I seriously doubt is over. Also, in FL at least, it's Juvenile court, not family.

My point was Nick Bate got a letter from CPS saying their investigation was over. It was. They had concluded it and turned it over to law enforcement, which promptly arrested him and threw him in prison, where he remains to this day and probably the rest of his life. His celebration was premature.

 

[Kosher Salt]

According to Joe, Nick is "much happier with this judge" and thinks that he is "very fair".

About 31 minutes in: https://rumble.com/v4zfsm2-the-foll...p-judge-kept-from-jury-alex-jones-still-.html

 

[Frank Cross]

But he isn't. She's totally representing herself pro se when she files absolutely identical motions with even the same cut and paste errors within a minute of when her husband also files that very same identical motion with the same error.

Believe the plan.

I'm sure it's impossible to prove, but theoretically, is misrepresenting yourself as a pro se defendant authorship in a legal filing contemptible?

(Edit: words)

 

[mindlessobserver]

I'm sure it's impossible to prove, but theoretically, is misrepresenting yourself as a pro se defendant authorship in a legal filing contemptible?

(Edit: words)

No, it's a legal Grey area, but ghost attorneys are a thing. It's definitely unethical though and the bar association will probably give you a smack if they catch you doing it. But it's not illegal or against the rules. Of course when this happens the ghost attorney is not also a codefendant.

Rekieta has bigger issues unrelated to ethics in representing Kayla, and it's doubtful the court will allow it to continue.

 

[AnOminous]

I'm sure it's impossible to prove, but theoretically, is misrepresenting yourself as a pro se defendant authorship in a legal filing contemptible?

(Edit: words)

Maybe, by a convoluted argument. But in general, it's permissible to assist a pro se litigant, and even when it's as blatant as this that this isn't actually what's happening, unlikely to result in disciplinary action. Nick's cavalier disregard for basic ethical rules will probably go unpunished in this situation.

 

[Pelican Bones]

Getting rid of Fischer is almost certainly the right call. Nick does not have this level of hatred and contempt of someone without that person knowing. I'll be willing to lay money the judge knows Nick, and thinks Nick is a smarmy, insufferable dickhead. And if what AnOminous has said previously about her is correct, then she seems like the type to let her "self-righteousness" get in the way.

Getting rid of her doesn't decrease the things Nick can appeal later on. In appeal the losing party can petition the court to hear why something during the trial caused real and material harm against the losing party. Misapplication of the law, etc. Fischer could rule against Nick on pretty much any issue and still do it "by the book". Nick will not get a court to let him appeal just because he and the judge don't like each other.

Nick's best shot is probably to submit motions to a judge that Nick hasn't accused of vagina liquor.

 

[a hapless toad]

Even on the gun charges, that depends. The report said they were unsecured, no locks on the rifle in the bedroom. Can't do that in Minnesota. We and Nick can bitch about it, but it's the law. Also was in a house with drugs. Can't do that either. That's two strikes. A shrewd prosecuter would say they were unsecured around children if he wants to play hard ball. That's a third strike.

Could a judge toss it if he's a gun fan? Yeah. But in terms of states and gun rights, Minnesota is very mid tier, if I remember my Guns and Ammo yearly states rankings correctly. It's a coin toss is what I'm saying.

See below:

HF 4300 isn't in effect until August 1, 2024. This is the current statute: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.666

609.666 NEGLIGENT STORAGE OF FIREARMS.​

Subdivision 1.Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following words have the meanings given.​

(a) "Firearm" means a device designed to be used as a weapon, from which is expelled a projectile by the force of any explosion or force of combustion.​

​

(b) "Child" means a person under the age of 18 years.​

​

(c) "Loaded" means the firearm has ammunition in the chamber or magazine, if the magazine is in the firearm, unless the firearm is incapable of being fired by a child who is likely to gain access to the firearm.​

​

Subd. 2.Access to firearms. A person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor who negligently stores or leaves a loaded firearm in a location where the person knows, or reasonably should know, that a child is likely to gain access, unless reasonable action is taken to secure the firearm against access by the child.​

​

Subd. 3.Limitations. Subdivision 2 does not apply to a child's access to firearms that was obtained as a result of an unlawful entry.​

If the guns weren't loaded then it's not a crime.

(What IS a crime is having drugs and guns, sorry Rackets.)

 

[Gas Grass Or Ass]

you know im actually glad that this disgusting ugly faggot prostitute revealed his true self. He isn't a conservative guy, only a whore pretending to be conservative, and im glad the whole world got to see it instead of the truth being hidden away and swept under the rug like it used to in the past (im looking at you MLK >_>)

now the whole world is mocking him, his wife and his joke of a 'marriage'. All his orbiters are cows, his associates are cows, his marriage is a cow, his wife is a cow and he himself is a fucking cow.

im glad i live in an age where men and women like him are exposed for who they are and rightfully mocked. These guys deserve all the mockery possible. Men and women like him give genuine conservatives a bad name, so it makes me happy they got exposed for their degeneracy, even though a part of my soul got tortured to death knowing all this degenerate whore bullshit happened.

I was one of the rando lurkers who gave him the benefit of the doubt for a long time. It was about a month or two after his "heckin' wholesome big chungus vacation" in Jamaica where I started to raise an eyebrow. Then he started talking about muh kiwifarms this, muh kiwifarms that. This is the point where I started to actually read his thread and two and two started to come together.

The moment he started to have that typical drugged up look, it was already confirmed to me. For me, things were very obvious by February and that was around the same time that I just lost interest in anything he had to say. The trial streams were pretty fun, but then his content started to become more focused on inane coomer/druggy shit.

Judge Fischer is probably breathing a huge sigh of relief at not having to deal with this fucktard any more than necessary. I bet she thinks Nick might settle with Monty soon because of this and remove another headache from her plate.

She'd be naive and he won't, but I wouldn't blame her for hoping.

A lot of people need to realize that just because you have "power" over the proceedings, it doesn't mean you may want to really sit around for them. If some annoying-ass scrawny alcoholic cokehead throws eggs at my house constantly, sure I can knock his teeth out but that doesn't mean I'd really enjoy it or be satisfied after the fact. Encounters with people you don't like aren't pleasant even when you hold all the cards, unless you're really truly a special kind of petty.

Minnesota's statute is actually pretty strong as such statutes go, allowing a spouse to invoke the privilege against the other spouse, but let's look at the language:

Minn. Stat. Ann. § 595.02(a).

Whoopsie daisy because that's probably the single worst and most life-destroying charge either of them face, despite being only a gross misdemeanor.

Am I to understand here that because of that exception, they're not allowed to invoke spousal privilege? I.e., they can be compelled to testify against one another?

 

[Thomas Talus]

But in general, it's permissible to assist a pro se litigant, and even when it's as blatant as this that this isn't actually what's happening, unlikely to result in disciplinary action.

Hell, in my neck of the woods there are state-approved non-attorneys who can provide extensive legal assistance and advice to pro se parties (specifically in family law cases).

I'll sometimes help people put together their filings for small claims (where they can't be represented in court by counsel anyway) or other civil matters where they don't have enough money to pay for a full representation.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

With what money? It took him well over a week to scrape together bail when hes supposedly rich. This is beyond optimistic for a drug and firearm charge with child abuse in the mix.

Is Minnesota and the county Nick is in cashless or cash bond? The bail bondsman could’ve demanded the $10,000 (for both parties, $5000 each) in cash.

 

[Kongou Posting]

From digging a bit on the new Judge, he is both Nick's best hope and worst nightmare. He offers generous 18-24 month straight and sober get your life back together plans. It's one of his big crusades.

But

You have to 100% be on the program. No room for fuck ups. If Nick fights this to the end. No program, he gets curbstomped by the Judge. If Nick pleads into the program and then goes back to being Nick. He gets curbstomped.

Nick's own adversarial nature has a high chance of fucking him over.

Honestly, I feel like this would make any potential prison sentence more kino than it would be if it were Fischer. If he is thrown behind bars, it's now entirely the fault of his own obstinacy and spite, as opposed to mostly.

 

[Iron Hamster]

Then he started talking about muh kiwifarms this, muh kiwifarms that

That's what piqued my interest in the farms.

 

[DickSanchez]

I'm more annoyed about his insinuation Mindset is in with Pedophiles and then lumping the forum in with that.

And Barnes is certainly playing his part in accomplishing such an annoyance.

Nick's best shot is probably to submit motions to a judge that Nick hasn't accused of vagina liquor.

I get the feeling that a drunk Nick (during one of his comeback streams) will talk shit about the new judge, along with the entire DOJ in Minnesota. Burning legal bridges seems to be his favorite pass time these days.

 

[Sir Baz the Intolerant]

Once again Nick has a problem with Fischer. We have seen no signs that Fischer has a problem with Nick. Or that she even remembers who he is without having the days case file in front of her. She's Nick's imaginary Nemesis who asks who he is each time she meets him.

> Lolcow with an imaginary female Nemesis he irrationally hates based on a single conversation that happened years ago

Wait a minute... Oh no, it's happening again.

 

[RodgerDodger]

The form only applies to a purchase from a firearms dealer. He could legally obtain a firearm privately and I don't think he'd be violating anything unless he keeps it in the same house as drugs again. That would be unwise.

That being said, I would definitely want to speak with my personal lawyer before I did anything like this if I was in Nick's shoes.

We're dealing with Nick. Who somehow managed to grow up in rural America with next to no actual knowledge and experience with firearms. As an adult he is a complete internet poser. If he goes to buy a gun any dealer is just as likely to step out back, spray paint one of his kids Nerf Guns "Tactical Black" and sell it to Nick as the latest and greatest Assault Rifle. Like this moron would ever know?

 

[repentance]

But he isn't. She's totally representing herself pro se when she files absolutely identical motions with even the same cut and paste errors within a minute of when her husband also files that very same identical motion with the same error.

Believe the plan.

Does the US have the equivalent of a McKenzie friend?

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

According to Joe, Nick is "much happier with this judge" and thinks that he is "very fair".

View attachment 6054384

About 31 minutes in: https://rumble.com/v4zfsm2-the-foll...p-judge-kept-from-jury-alex-jones-still-.html

Is he trying to love-bomb the judge? LMAO! Total NPD behaviour!

Am I to understand here that because of that exception, they're not allowed to invoke spousal privilege? I.e., they can be compelled to testify against one another?

That is how I read it. For the child endangerment, at the very least. It makes sense if one parent is enabling child abuse to happen by the other, or worse, both are guilty.

We're dealing with Nick. Who somehow managed to grow up in rural America with next to no actual knowledge and experience with firearms. As an adult he is a complete internet poser. If he goes to buy a gun any dealer is just as likely to step out back, spray paint one of his kids Nerf Guns "Tactical Black" and sell it to Nick as the latest and greatest Assault Rifle. Like this moron would ever know?

Embarrassing for a real HARD NIGGA that grew up in the HOOD! Doesn't know about the gunz..guns...

He actually only was in Houston until 6 or 7, then moved to Lakeview, Minnesota. He has also talked about all thr things he wished he learned from his grandfather but never did (i.e. Polish, hunting, guitar, etc...) nick reads to me as an indoor nerd who didn't do much at all--except get bullied and seethe while watching softcover porn as early as 8--or so he says..