I don't know if she is a pedophile or not, but she sure does cater to them seeing as her entire job is pretending to be an anime child to help pedos jerk off and she definitely is very much pro lolicon art because "it's just a fictional child". That doesn't apply to vtubers who pretend to be adult anime women, although they are still internet prostitutes essentially making a living off lonely neet men like you. Can you not understand the difference between an adult and a child?
I can. The difference is, that I don't make the leap to pedophiles.
Here I will give the correct take directly to the people:
Kirshe, don't sexualize your persona on the internet, for either money, apathy, or otherwise it is not good.
Jim, don't sexualize your persona on the internet, for either money, apathy, or otherwise it is not good.
Josh, don't sexualize your persona on the internet, for either money, apathy, or otherwise it is not good.
Markipliar, don't sexualize your persona on the internet, for either money, apathy, or otherwise it is not good.
Mr. Beast, don't sexualize your persona on the internet, for either money, apathy, or otherwise it is not good.
Pippa, don't sexualize your persona on the internet, for either money, apathy, or otherwise it is not good; and because it is a child you are doing something even worse than the others.
In none of these did I have to say they are pedophiles. One is worse but the pedophile solution is bullets, and I don't think any of these people are at the point people should shoot them.
What the fuck is even this argument
Whether in fiction or reality, there's possible reasons to kill someone for a good reason, like protecting someone else.
There's no possible reason where FUCKING A CHILD or even lusting after one can have a good justification.
That is why it was funny. It was an absurd juxtoposition exacerbated by Pippa scrambling to try to find plausible ridiculous arguments to make Kirshe embarrassed.