If you scroll through her replies timeline, you'll notice she replies to lots of bigger accounts commonly aligned with illiberal or right-wing ideas. She seems particularly keen on replying to ClownWorld_, PicturesFoIder, Ian Miles Cheong and Andrew Tate. I felt capping it all would be an exhausting task, but if you wish, here are some more nuggets. Apart from reply-girling to Andrew Tate, she also egregiously suggests a woman supposedly rescued by an elderly man will later accuse her hero of assault:
View attachment 6086050View attachment 6086051View attachment 6086052View attachment 6086054View attachment 6086055
Her entire presence reeks of engagement bait and piggybacking off the griftosphere. With social media and the subsequent flood of fame hungry narcissists and slick grifters eagerly exploiting whatever's left of the Internet's reach, small-timers learned ways to earn clout and money by adopting a hard stance on any controversial topic and then milking it for some cash. In her case, what's also particularly annoying is that her comments are rather pithy and low effort even by Twitter's standards, so she seems much more interested in boosting her profile than earnestly advancing any deep-seated beliefs or ideas. It's all very insincere to me.