UN Women says gender-critical activists are ‘anti-rights movement’ - The agency claims that ‘state and non-state actors’ in many countries are trying to entrench stigma


UN Women has been criticised for saying that women’s rights activists were “falsely” trying to claim that transgender people pose a threat to single-sex spaces.

The organisation, which has had advocates including the Duchess of Sussex, had made several statements about gender on Instagram for Pride month.

It said there was an “anti-rights movement” which was seeking to “falsely portray the rights of LGBTQ+ people as competing with women’s rights”.

UN Women added: “Some try to frame the human rights of transgender people as being at odds with women’s rights.

“For instance, asserting that trans women pose a threat to the rights, spaces and safety of cisgender women.”

UN Women is charged with working for gender equality and the empowerment of women.

Meghan has previously been an advocate for the group, while Emma Watson, the actress known for her role as Hermione in the Harry Potter films, was a goodwill ambassador.

UN Women also linked to a 1,300-word “explainer” titled LGBTIQ+ communities and the anti-rights pushback: five things to know.

The document included the claim that “state and non-state actors” in many countries were attempting to roll back rights and entrench stigma, “endangering the rights and lives” of LGBT people.

The explainer said there was a long tradition in which anti-rights movements frame equality for women and LGBT people as a threat to “traditional” family values, which “gender-critical” campaigners have taken to extremes.

However, gender critical campaigners said last night that it was “outrageous” to label defenders of a “tidal wave of gender ideology” as “anti-rights” activists.

Sex is a protected characteristic under the UK’s Equality Act.

Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at Sex Matters, said: “It’s a sad day when UN Women lectures women’s rights campaigners on the need to include men with transgender identities in our work.

“Labelling the grassroots campaigners and groups who are defending women’s rights against a global tidal wave of gender-identity ideology as an ‘anti-rights movement’ is outrageous.

“There is simply no way to defend the claim that trans rights don’t compete with women’s rights, so UN Women had to resort to conflating the rights of lesbian, gay and bisexual people with those of people who claim a gender identity in order to make its point.

“UN Women’s claim that campaigners are ‘putting lives at risk’ has been refuted time and time again — this is dangerous and irresponsible propaganda.”

UN Women faced criticism for its response to the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, for failing to condemn alleged gender-based war crimes adequately.

It also waited seven weeks before issuing any statement of condemnation of sexual violence.

UN Women has been contacted for comment.
Because, if anyone is qualified to lecture us about women's rights, it's the organization led by brutal Islamic dictatorships that sends its diplomats and "peacekeepers" to rape and sex traffic women around the world.

The complete and total destruction of the United Nations - a pathetically worthless waste of taxpayer money currently on its last legs - in the coming years is something that I eagerly look forward to.

Every time I hear about UN workers getting massacred, it absolutely makes my day. Total UN death.

uoonwvjcuu261.jpg
 
The embedding of the gender ideology in the UN is quite the rabbit hole .
Now sometimes AI is shit, it still can’t convert KG to stone and pounds, but when I put Peter newell/un/gender in it gave me this lovely summary, which is what I wanted to write. Thanks AI!
Peter Newell, a British children’s rights campaigner, has been involved in shaping the United Nations’ (UN) approach to children’s rights. However, his controversial past has raised concerns about his influence on the UN’s policies.

UNICEF Implementation Handbook

Newell wrote all three editions of the UNICEF Implementation Handbook for the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). The UNCRC is a UN treaty published in 1989, which mentions a child’s sex as a basic characteristic that needs to be respected. However, the third edition of the Handbook, published in 2007, barely refers to a child’s sex and instead reinterprets Article 8 of the UNCRC to say that gender identity is a part of a child’s identity, like national or ethnic identity, that needs to be preserved as a matter of human rights.

Yogyakarta Principles

The Yogyakarta Principles, a set of ideas propounded by activists, define “gender identity” as a person’s deeply felt internal and individual experience of gender, which may or may not correspond with the sex assigned at birth. Newell’s involvement in the UNICEF Handbook and the Yogyakarta Principles has raised concerns about his influence on the UN’s approach to gender identity.

Controversy and Criticism

Newell’s involvement in the UN’s children’s rights discourse has been criticized due to his controversial past. He was jailed for six years for the historic rape of a 13-year-old boy. This has led to concerns about his ability to shape policies that affect children’s rights and well-being.

Conclusion

Peter Newell’s involvement in the UN’s children’s rights discourse has been controversial, with concerns about his influence on the UN’s approach to gender identity and children’s rights. His past actions have raised questions about his ability to shape policies that affect children’s well-being.

Article about Peter newell, the convicted child rapist: https://archive.is/rvkOD

The Yogyakarta principles: @3MMA writes a great post here
Post in thread 'Tranny Sideshows on Social Media'
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/tranny-sideshows-on-social-media.33028/post-9527104

This is the kind of thing I show people when they won’t believe that a nasty cabal of people is in charge of an awful lot of the stuff foisted on us.

Tl:dr, convicted child rapist writes implementation handbook for In gender policy, Yogyakarta principles created by Troons and inform international policy.
 
Aren't there like 3 or 4 different UN orgs with similar names and alleged purpose to UN Women, the one most famous for inviting Anita and Zoe to ramble about Goobergrape?

I know it probably doesn't matter since they all have wahmen-respecting countries like Saudi Arabia and Chad there, much like the UN "Human Rights" orgs do. It's like they exist for every purpose besides women's rights.
 
We need a version of the UN meme but with a terf instead of trollface guy.
Newell’s involvement in the UN’s children’s rights discourse has been criticized due to his controversial past. He was jailed for six years for the historic rape of a 13-year-old boy. This has led to concerns about his ability to shape policies that affect children’s rights and well-being.
Just checked it out, dude went to jail in 2018 for this, but all the shit he made up at the UN is still in place.
 
I don't see the problem. Women absolutely love trannies so why would they be opposed to sharing spaces with them?
There is a weird strain of feminist losers on this site that will react to this like you've said something stupid. In reality, of course, you're absolutely right.

The trans ideology could never have got to where it has if not for standing on the shoulders of feminists, who first pushed the idea that man and woman were identical and only social norms distinguish us.

The trans issue is exclusively an issue of feminists watching people take their own ideas to their logical conclusion. If men and women are no different, then why not make the terms totally meaningless?
 
There is a weird strain of feminist losers on this site that will react to this like you've said something stupid. In reality, of course, you're absolutely right.

The trans ideology could never have got to where it has if not for standing on the shoulders of feminists, who first pushed the idea that man and woman were identical and only social norms distinguish us.

The trans issue is exclusively an issue of feminists watching people take their own ideas to their logical conclusion. If men and women are no different, then why not make the terms totally meaningless?
maybe its actually a weird mix of scientific advancement (transhumanism, birth control, modernization of the work force reducing the need for manual labor), a dash of the internet creating a hyper reality, and the strange post modern idea of identity (due to workforce, familial, and local ties being severed or degraded) that also coalesced into one gigantic beast… and it’s not solely women or feminism to blame? Rather an amalgamation of modern ailments?

Personally, I think Uncle Ted was on to something. And I don’t think handling the cancerous, modern “feminism” alone will help. The rot goes deeper, imo
 
Pedophiles: reeee wamen
I don't see the problem. Women absolutely love trannies so why would they be opposed to sharing spaces with them?
There is a weird strain of feminist losers on this site that will react to this like you've said something stupid. In reality, of course, you're absolutely right.
How can this be? I was told by women on KF that women never support troons ever, and feminists aren't responsible for the spread oftroon nonsense.
You were.
Get a room, fuck in a circle, and cry about hohlodomor.


Meanwhile,
Now sometimes AI is shit, it still can’t convert KG to stone and pounds, but when I put Peter newell/un/gender in it gave me this lovely summary, which is what I wanted to write. Thanks AI!
Peter Newell, a British children’s rights campaigner
the actual promoter of gendershit in the UN is a male pedophile, even the AI gets it right.
 
"Rights" in the eyes of NGOs only exist when they apply to people who should have less of them so this is unfathomably based even if taken at face value.
 
This is the literal organization of the antichrist, that is all I need to know.
 
Back