Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

Dawn French was in the Harry Potter films too.
She plays the Fat lady in the portrait at least once.
Ah of course. I suspect there's probably someone else amongst the cast there that made it in, the Potter films were a who's who of UK actors after all.
Recursively on topic, in fact...
Sometimes the irony just never stops.
 
this thread:
hero.png
 
Rowling posts about the death of Françoise Hardy.

View attachment 6081503

Reactions:

View attachment 6081511

View attachment 6081512View attachment 6081517

View attachment 6081513View attachment 6081514View attachment 6081518

Troons just can't stop themselves doing the funeral meme again and again.

I wonder if J.K. Rowling can tweet anything at all, these days, without a load of looney troons in the comments, calling her an evil bigot TERF cunt or whatever, even about things completely unrelated to transgenderism. It's like her just existing is a source of impotent moid rage for them.

It puts me in mind of this tweet from Scottish Twitter.

1718379096926.png
 
What?! Charles Hamilton's work is incredible, there are arcs in his stories that resolved over decades of weekly episodes. Admittedly, there are piles of dogshit school stories from the era but he was great. And he didn't even particularly like writing them—he just loved taking the wages to Monte Carlo.

Rowling definitely read a lot of his stories before writing HP.

Oh hold on, I don't think you were calling him crap. Were you? Pesky unclear antecedents.
Nah, some of them surely were good; as a general genre they were a bit before my time though and there was, of course loads of other stuff absolutely churned out, comics I'm thinking fo especially, that you'd come across in a dated old annual really bored with nothing else to read.
And because of their success, I'm sure some of the stuff that had been good at one point got beaten into the ground so any random Billy Bunter comic might hugely vary in quality.
Not my cup of tea in general but they had their place very much.

(in fact, I've just read of Hamilton that he is in the Guinness book of records as the most prolific author, writing about a hundred million words. Some are sure to be good, some are sure to be not, lol, man I didn't realsie it was literally still just him)

I'd still say Harry Potter is way more multi dimensional than them, and the idea it counts as a copy or a rip off of the worst witch as idiotic I think is inarguable unless you're a twitter seethepot throwing anything to see if it sticks at JKR.
Honestly for people who endlessly cling to the phrase "bad faith" when shutting down any philosophical quibbles about trans shit-they constantly exist in bad faith and tell so many outright lies, they surely must be aware of it. It must be really weird to be telling flat out lies constantly and try to think you're some sort of hero. I wonder if they have any long dark nights of the soul about it.
Or if they never have twitter rout of their hands long enough to have a thought of their own.
 
Last edited:
Translated from Copenese: "Actual women don't want to participate in my fantasy of a made-up slam dunk that only serves to deny that their sex exists as different from males."

How do they not realize how terrible this looks for them? The average woman seems in solidarity with the TERFery, especially now that troons have turned every facet of this issue into a smoldering shitshow. The silence speaks volumes.
 
That’s impressively retarded overthinking.

Rowling HATES trans people, ergo Rowling is a closet pooner.

They really don’t understand what her position is.
Same as "they think we are disgusting because they really want to fuck us/are jealous of us". It's cope. I'm still not sure if all/some/most of them actually  believe that, but they definitely say it as cope.
 
it's so over, JK Rowling got HECKIN MISGENDERED!
View attachment 6096414
will she ever recover from this?
If Rowling were to see this she would likely a) laugh her ass off, because it would clearly be for the sake of trying to insult her and nothing else, and definitely b) not see it as something that means she's not actually a woman, because being a woman (or a man) is not something that is dependent on whether other people regard you as such, but on biological reality.

Even in cases where a "cis" person is genuinely mistaken for the opposite sex, the majority of people would just treat it as precisely that, instead of throwing a tantrum and see it as a sign that they are genuinely not-female or not-male.

What does it say about the realness of the true and honest gender identity of trans people, if they think that calling Rowling a man is enough to invalidate her being female? Meanwhile, Rose the girl dick supremacist transbian is still going to need to have his prostate checked when (or rather, if) he hits 50 no matter how many times he has his "womanhood" affirmed.
 
Same as "they think we are disgusting because they really want to fuck us/are jealous of us". It's cope. I'm still not sure if all/some/most of them actually  believe that, but they definitely say it as cope.
It’s the same logic as “bullies are just taking out their insecurities on you.”

Maybe some bullies were so because they were victims and physical abuse at home but the majority are just kids doing the usual securing place in pecking order of school and peer group.

That I think is a huge part of the problem with a lot of the mentality of today, that any form of “bullying” is considered intolerable and wrong.
This of course extends to shaming, disagreeing and not indulging them in their fantasies and beliefs.
 
Back