Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

This particular video was a breakdown of how some guy did a tinder/similar site experiment; the guy created a fake profile of a chad-tier looking male who basically admitted to a criminal past of abusing a boy. The profile got all kinds of hits from shitcunts, basically excusing the male of his crimes and getting down to when they could meet etc.
This is a hilarious story but it needs to be tested a lot more, and with some catfishing of men, to say anything substantial, it could well be that this merely selected for the worst women after everyone sane got turned off immediately, kind of like a hyperefficient Nigerian Prince scam's filtering mechanism. Yeah I'm being pedantic but it just does my perspective harm in the long run if I embrace untried narratives because they flatter my predisposition.
 
Nigger what? Unless there's been some massive overhaul to Death's character, she's not anywhere near the type of cunt you're talking about. She's depicted as rather upbeat and kind, especially to those who have just died. Like I said, maybe DC has fucked over her character, but from what I remember about the Sandman series, Death is actually pretty nice. I don't recall her ever being a misandrist.
You're absolutely right: she is very upbeat and kind, so my deeply autistic rambling isn't applicable to the character per se, but rather the intent of the artists portraying her. I was trying to convey what I have noticed to be a sort of "wholesome, defiant underdog"-mentality underlying the intent in how artists like those that drew Sandman depict their female characters. The character of Death sometimes comes across a bit like the "The Manic Pixie Dream Girl"-trope, which is apt considering that it contrasts nicely with the nature of her job, but it's also telling of where the artists writing and drawing her comes from.
While the Sandman is one of few good comics, it's undoubtable that it has had pozzed influences during its making.

I'll keep my smelly commentary on something as trivial as comic books to the Comicsgate-thread.

I also notice that I sperged out quite hard with the word "whore", which I'm deeply embarrassed about. Sorry for that.

Women at large are of course not "disgusting, histrionic whores", as I disgustingly remarked, but more than a few in our time are, unfortunately.
 
if you want femcels look in the manhate thread
I haven't ever looked in that thread, but I can guarantee that most of the "femcels" in that thread either have boyfriends, have recently had a boyfriend, or have had men attempt to flirt with them that they've rejected for various reasons.
his particular video was a breakdown of how some guy did a tinder/similar site experiment; the guy created a fake profile of a chad-tier looking male who basically admitted to a criminal past of abusing a boy. The profile got all kinds of hits from shitcunts, basically excusing the male of his crimes and getting down to when they could meet etc.

The guy behind the experiment would add more shocking details within the exchanges with the thirsty whores; including how the boy was pre-pubescent, committed multiple offences etc. Those cunts would not be deterred, and messaged back saying things along the lines of ‘everyone deserves a second chance’ etc etc.
Yeah, Chadfishing's actually a thing a decent amount of people online have done. Some of the ones I've seen have included:
>putting Hitler quotes in his "about me" and photoshopping an extremely visible swastika tattoo on the Chad, who was still somehow getting positive responses from progressive art chicks
>admitting to being a registered sex offender for sexually assaulting a minor and feeling no remorse because "she was asking for it"
>claiming to having been arrested previously for domestic abuse
>speaking like a literal caveman with extremely short responses in broken English (eg: "me like you")
>writing complete nonsense in their "about me" and only responding to women with similar nonsense

All of these had several women responding to these men positively, and all of these women were confirmed to not be bots. Granted, it's hard to tell how cherrypicked the results are, but the fact that these are even getting matches at all means these people are still doing better than the majority of men.
 
I can't get a normal woman to care about my autistic interests.
I'm probably in the minority but I have no desire for a woman to share my interests. It's a good thing for each of us to have activities to do independently of the other. The things I enjoy I'd rather do on my own.

Rather than common interests, I consider not having niggercattle mentality by far the most important non-physical trait. A woman that doesn't have an innate distrust of authority is a lost cause in the (((current year))).

>putting Hitler quotes in his "about me" and photoshopping an extremely visible swastika tattoo on the Chad, who was still somehow getting positive responses from progressive art chicks
This a women hate thread, not women love thread.
 
they could end/escape their femcel status immediately if they wanted to, but they don't want to because they feel that all the males available to them are unworthy and beneath them.
Or because they're anxious, depressed, afraid of getting used, have self esteem too low to even try, or have any of a litany of other issues thinking humans can develop.

If some chick's a weird internet-dwelling agoraphobic and has to fight off a panic attack every time she leaves the house to go someplace unfamiliar, dating is going to be a challenge for her. And lord knows there are enough sad neurotic women nowadays.

I don't even know what this type of thinking is with the "femcels don't exist all women have it easy and they never independently struggle" thing; trannies do it too though so I'm quite convinced it's not a healthy school of thought wherever it comes from.

I'm probably in the minority but I have no desire for a woman to share my interests. It's a good thing for each of us to have activities to do independently of the other. The things I enjoy I'd rather do on my own.

Rather than common interests, I consider not having niggercattle mentality by far the most important non-physical trait. A woman that doesn't have an innate distrust of authority is a lost cause in the (((current year))).
I don't either, that's weird. Open mindedness is a positive trait so that you can do things together or appreciate what the other person does, but that's all.
If I were to get psychoanalytic I'd say it has something to do with a lack of self-understanding leading people to attempt to form social or romantic relationships based upon more surface level similarities.

Of course online dating specifically encourages that because you're judging people based upon either looks or dating profiles, which is why it sucks. You're supposed to be looking for another human being you can co-experience life with, not shopping for a used car.
 
Or because they're anxious, depressed, afraid of getting used, have self esteem too low to even try, or have any of a litany of other issues thinking humans can develop.

If some chick's a weird internet-dwelling agoraphobic and has to fight off a panic attack every time she leaves the house to go someplace unfamiliar, dating is going to be a challenge for her. And lord knows there are enough sad neurotic women nowadays.

I don't even know what this type of thinking is with the "femcels don't exist all women have it easy and they never independently struggle" thing; trannies do it too though so I'm quite convinced it's not a healthy school of thought wherever it comes from.
Ultrapenguin? Ultranormie, moar liek. You're fucking clueless, and hopelessly blue-pilled. Can't be arsed to explain it all again, because we've been over this shit so many, many times.

Yeah, yeah, wahmens most affected. Whatthefuckever.
 
@Ultrapenguin

It's not that women don't struggle with things. I know there's tons of neurotic women who are a misplaced starbucks order away from a panic attack.

But even those women don't struggle to find male attention. If they made a tinder profile they would likely get hundreds of messages.

Now let's look at a similar incel with those same problems. You think he's getting sweet fuck all on tinder? That's why they're not comparable.
 
ItsAGundam ended up somewhere between hysterical laughter and crying in disbelief.
I remember the spin at the time was that he deliberately left out the women who weren’t interested in some child abusing chad and those he posted were the only women who’d be in favor of being with a guy like that. This of course completely ignores the fact that these thots fell for an obviously fake profile.

Reminds me of my friend who photoshopped bad six pack abs to his profile and figured by the time girls arrived they weren’t going to leave and he was right. Now is married with a knockout and the key to his success on Tinder is lie your ass off on the profile. Nothing makes a twat drier than the Sahara like being honest and respectable. She wants Christian Grey, not John Smith, CPA.
 
If the concept of ‘shame’ as a societal good had been brought back to the Western world sooner, then perhaps we wouldn’t have fallen quite so far and so quickly.

The concept of shaming women for bad behavior was flushed out of society not long after they got the vote.
 
Here's itsagundam's video about the child rapist Chadfish


Here's some info I could find about "Jason" the Nazi Chadfish with the swastika arm tattoo: https://www.reddit.com/r/Tinder/comments/sev9hu/literally_nazi_gets_363_matches_on_tinder/

And on the opposite side, here's some information about "Juggernaut Law" and "Pigwomanfish":

incels.wiki said:
Juggernaut law is the theory that the very most unattractive women receive a surprisingly large amount of attention from men, sometimes more attention than women of average attractiveness.

The name of the law derives from the idea that a women's SMV is 'unstoppable' like a Juggernaut.

An example of Juggernaut Law in action:

incels.wiki said:
Pig woman experiment
The infamous “pig woman” dating experiment (see figure at the top) proved that females essentially can’t be incels, since even the most deformed landwhales would get hit on by average looking dudes and even a Tyrone. The experiment best highlights Juggernaut law. The experiment was originally posted on the 'misc' subforum of Bodybuilding.com and was later replicated by a Lookism.net user.[3]

Online dating is fucked. Women are fucked for rewarding the worst of men with sex. Men are fucked for wanting to have sex with pig women.

PS. I like how incels.wiki uses cloudflare. I thought incels were right-wing terrorists.
 
Last edited:
On another note, I saw a picture on 4chan the other day, it was of a really well drawn Miku and a letter saying how the artist was fond of the girl he was giving the note to but felt too nervous to say it out loud.

It was crumpled up in the trash.
That unironically makes me MATI. Not necessarily at the girl, but with women in general. Women constantly ask why men won't do romantic things for them like this. This is why. That kid will never draw something for a woman like that ever again. There is no "well he just should do it for a woman who appreciates him". No. It took a lot of courage to put himself out there and he got stomped on for it. He is never going to chance getting hurt like that ever again. There is no woman out there, outside the mother of his children, who deserves that kind of gesture. He won't risk letting someone hurt him that way again. The pain of rejection like that, outweighs any reward he could ever get. Young guys often think and want their crushes to like them as much as they like them. They don't understand that very often you will never receive that same affection back and once they find out the hard way, it doesn't just hurt them, it changes who they are on a fundamental level.

Women carry baggage. Men don't carry baggage that way. Men just change behaviors and unless you're a really stellar woman, you'll never get him to change back.
 
Yeah, we totally need experiment to see if hot, psychotic girls can get dick. Absolute mystery as to what the outcome will be.
there's a difference between just being a crazy psycho and being a literal child rapist

also if i recall correctly the point of these experiments in particular wasn't to make a blanket "omg woman bad" statement, it was done to specifically refute a recurring type of attack that tried arguing that "incels get no girls because women can sense their misogyny and that drives them away"
showing that chad will get plenty of girls even as a confirmed rapist was considered the ultimate nail in the coffin for this argument.

//and honestly to prove that specific point this experiment wasn't even necessary. stories of known abusive husbands and wife beaters easily getting a new girl despite her knowing full well about his reputation are very common.
 
there's a difference between just being a crazy psycho and being a literal child rapist

also if i recall correctly the point of these experiments in particular wasn't to make a blanket "omg woman bad" statement, it was done to specifically refute a recurring type of attack that tried arguing that "incels get no girls because women can sense their misogyny and that drives them away"
showing that chad will get plenty of girls attention even as a confirmed rapist was considered the ultimate nail in the coffin for this argument.

Also, everyone knows that guys don't really care who a woman is. If she's got nice tits and a pretty face, we know she won't have trouble meeting men. The test also obliterates the claim that women don't also get stupid-horny for hot guys. There's also a related claim that women never deliberately get involved with guys they know are dangerous to them. A woman who repeatedly gets with abusive guys just has bad luck, and her choice-making should not in any way be questioned. This shows that even when a hot guy makes it obvious that he will probably kill you and rape your kids, there's no shortage of pussies getting wet for him.
 
Also, everyone knows that guys don't really care who a woman is. If she's got nice tits and a pretty face, we know she won't have trouble meeting men. The test also obliterates the claim that women don't also get stupid-horny for hot guys. There's also a related claim that women never deliberately get involved with guys they know are dangerous to them. A woman who repeatedly gets with abusive guys just has bad luck, and her choice-making should not in any way be questioned. This shows that even when a hot guy makes it obvious that he will probably kill you and rape your kids, there's no shortage of pussies getting wet for him.
there is a different response to these situations, yes
with women it's "omg so sorry that happened to you, what an asshole!"
with men it's "don't stick your dick in crazy bro, you should have known better"
 
Back