It's amazing how he strictly adheres to "this is only relevant if it's an established fact in the legal documents" until he needs to protect virtual avatars who livestream from being criticized for being unironic pedophiles, then it's "those anti[-pedophile]s clout goblins are only trying to boost their numbers!" Interesting how then he can invent motivations and ascribe them to entire swaths of people.
Not to sound like an Andrew defender here but I don't ever recall him really being on Nick's side or Barnes side. He was neutral at first saying we don't know what really happened but it looked bad for Nick. That was before the initial documents dropped. Then Barnes did that retarded constitutional video and Andrew commented on it saying that it made sense on it's face, but all that was before the search warrant dropped. As soon as that search warrant dropped, Andrew was not on Barnes side and said Nick was doomed without saying it. Through this whole thing, even at the very start, all I saw was Andrew in his videos say that he used to be friends with Nick but had to distance himself because Nick was going off the rails behind the scenes and just wouldn't listen to subtle hints to get his shit together.
Element of both factions seethe at him. Detractors see him as a balldoguard who streamed with Nick well into his degen arc.
Agreed. He was also one of the first in lawtube to distance himself from Nick at the beginning of his spiral.
Look at Liquid Kid's list. He's on it.
That reminds me of something.
Well they weren't being fed anything else. When you're hungry, you eat whats available.
When Barnes listed off the amendments he thought were violated during Nick's arrest on the Viva/Barnes stream, the very first stream Legal Mindset made after that he seemed like he was optimistic about Nick's case based on what Barnes said, but other lawyers who came on Legal Dicksucker's stream disagreed and said why, and you could literally see the change of mind dawn on Andrew as the stream went on.
If it was a singular incident, an MM of hair or less would contain the metabolites, and you wouldn't get the 5ng/mg that was detected. If we are to assume no errors were made in testing, it could only come from repeated ingestion over a significant period of time. The "best case" scenario here is that they were doing something stupid like putting some in her food/drink to "medicate" her for ADD or something.
3:10 - "I say that in the most [unintelligible] way possible. You're a piece of shit."
I heard "endearing", as well.
Yeah I was angry. I accept my tophats and concede the point.
Maybe he doesn't know what that word means or misspoke, then.
