Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 127 37.4%

  • Total voters
    340
As annoying as he is, he's also correct. Don't give the state more rope to hang you with. Guilty or not guilty.

We all know he's guilty. There's no point in trying to force confessions/answers out of him on social media. Just keep compiling the evidence until it's overwhelming. He's cooked.
The state already have his drug test results and inspected his whole home. He´s withdrawing info from the CPS, it has nothing to do with his criminal case.
 
As he himself has pointed out, he is charged with possession. I don't see how information about his past drug use or the results of drug tests makes any difference to that one way or the other.
Because it more or less eliminates any reasonable doubt that he didn't know it was there or it was just planted (as if there existed any reasonable doubt anyway).
 
Nick is actually the biggest retard in the universe. After all that huffing and puffing on his stream he's now fighting with randos on twitter about his actual ongoing criminal case concerning the fate of his children. His kids are like one step away from going to the white trash version of the foster home portrayed in The Wire. It's fucked up getting institutionalized as a kid, even temporarily, even for a few weeks. These places are not good, even the nice one's are basically half-way houses. Half the kids have serious behavioral issues including random violence. In an urban setting you'll have 11 year olds with loose gang associations. 14 year old girls getting pregnant with plenty of self-harm and suicidal behavior. Every other day someone will just be hysterically screaming or smashing shit throughout the night.

Instead of being a good little statist boy and crossing his T's, dotting his I's. He's rage-posting on twitter. IHMO this is worse than actually intentionally dosing your 9 year old with hard drugs (within reasonable bounds). A marginal amount of cocaine will be nothing compared the serious psychological damage that comes from institutionalization.
 
Given this man's ability to read the same superchats over and over, and ramble about things in a random access manner, I wonder if he would genuinely think he "reached" 440K subs when he falls to that number.

Might even get a celebration stream.
It's possible. He seems to have suffered permanent brain damage that is affecting his mood and thought process.
Because it more or less eliminates any reasonable doubt that he didn't know it was there or it was just planted (as if there existed any reasonable doubt anyway).
Is there a reason why cps cant get the test results straight from the criminal court side or is it done this way to purposely test the parents behavior under scrutiny?
 
Nick is actually the biggest retard in the universe. After all that huffing and puffing on his stream he's now fighting with randos on twitter about his actual ongoing criminal case concerning the fate of his children. His kids are like one step away from going to the white trash version of the foster home portrayed in The Wire. It's fucked up getting institutionalized as a kid, even temporarily, even for a few weeks. These places are not good, even the nice one's are basically half-way houses. Half the kids have serious behavioral issues including random violence. In an urban setting you'll have 11 year olds with loose gang associations. 14 year old girls getting pregnant with plenty of self-harm and suicidal behavior. Every other day someone will just be hysterically screaming or smashing shit throughout the night.

Instead of being a good little statist boy and crossing his T's, dotting his I's. He's rage-posting on twitter. IHMO this is worse than actually intentionally dosing your 9 year old with hard drugs (within reasonable bounds). A marginal amount of cocaine will be nothing compared the serious psychological damage that comes from institutionalization.

Seriously, it might be endearing mischief that your 9 year old gets violent with you Nick but the first psychotic schizo 14 year old she hits won't be entertained.
Though I still hear back and forth on whether or not she's actually with the grandparents.
 
Is there a reason why cps cant get the test results straight from the criminal court side or is it done this way to purposely test the parents behavior under scrutiny?
While juvie/family proceedings take place in a court (of limited jurisdiction), the social service agency doing the investigation is not really a direct law enforcement agency and generally has to enforce its decisions in an actual court. However, a CHIPS proceeding not being (usually) a criminal proceeding, the court can take account of the parents' refusal to cooperate. No cooperation, no kids.

The separate abuse/neglect charges are an actual crime, though, and law enforcement has the power to use warrants. I'm not sure to what degree even the state can use information from these tests in the criminal case, or if that would make them available to the CHIPS case, outside of implied consent cases where the refusal to submit to testing if pulled over while driving is itself a separate crime.

I'm not entirely sure what the legal effect of withdrawing consent after taking the test even is.
 
Weren´t they with the grandparents who are registered in the foster care system?
I don't know where the kids are, other than not at home. I said one step and if they're not already in a state-ran facility it's a constant risk that it may happen.

Nick clearly hasn't had his "rock bottom" moment despite this being extraordinarily rock bottom. This indicates to me that he's valuing his own ego over existential risks to his children's lives. This is all his fault, his children didn't do anything wrong, they didn't narc. Nick is just such a degenerate he can't even keep up basic appearances. He only has himself to blame when his daughter starts cutting herself and drops out of highschool after getting pregnant. That's what happens to deeply traumatized children. It's like a type of self-reinforcing fate that has been forced upon them. There's a reason everyone knows that one girl who is *always* in an abusive relationship; she was probably diddled as a kid.
 
Personally I like the classics. The overuse of AI in meme making is bad, because you are just making AI slop. Using AI to put balldo's face over Hitler wouldn't make it funnier, it is funny already due to the subtitles. Nor would changing the German language to match the subtitles be funnier, it is already funny because trying to match the cadence of the original speech with your own text is part of the process.
"mein Balldo... Aaron..."
It's just the same video with the same voices that people have seen a thousand times. AI allows all kinds of tomfoolery. You can't exactly say AI is overused when you're just taking the downfall video and putting subtitles on...
 
Weren´t they with the grandparents who are registered in the foster care system?
Kayla's parents do not show up in the online database, so it appears their license has lapsed. Aaron and Nick have made reference to them being safe. Minnesota's training manual stresses placing children with family and it is accepted practice, in other states at least, to allow family to take classes to become licensed while they have children placed with them. None of this is conclusive, it's just likely. You'd hope Kayla's parents would have the connections in CPS and know the system well enough to fast track things. The concerns are that sometimes placing with family is avoided immediately so that the parents cannot contact the children while the investigation is in the initial phase and saddling 5 kids on one family is a difficult situation. Splitting the children up is not out of the question.
 
The state already have his drug test results and inspected his whole home. He´s withdrawing info from the CPS, it has nothing to do with his criminal case.

Do police drug test you for possession charges? They don't in the UK. Either you're in possession or you aren't. They can test you if you're driving, but they've got no right to test you if they catch you with an ounce of coke.

(I know this shit flies in some shithole countries like Japan, where the police roll into a bar, urine test everybody and if you test positive you're going to jug. It doesn't fly here though.)

He obviously offered up the test in an attempt to demonstrate he was innocent of the neglect allegations, realized that they'd all show up positive and wouldn't help him at all, so then withdrew consent for the results of the test to be shared. He can yap online all he wants, but his actions here will speak volumes to the courts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: parsnip
Not sure if anyone pointed this out but one thing I found funny during Nicks last freak out stream was when he said the other lawyers who criticize him always tuck their balls in their ass when the government comes along, Nick....buddy....you not only endorsed but invested in a phallic device that did just that but literally. Come on...LOL
 
Spoilering my responses to contain the spergery.

As far as an inability to foresee the consequences his actions may have on those around him, while it is easy to dismiss this as the usual behavior of a hedonist, many have pointed out that they had substance-abusing parents who acted with more regard for their children than Nick. This is where his rampant narcissism become obvious, as he sees his intimate relations as extensions of himself, rather than as other people with minds and emotions of their own. Here is where his potential to unapologetically neglect and abuse his wife and children comes from, and, I think, why the hypothesis that he was dosing his 8 year-old with cocaine to treat her for ADHD is very likely. This deep-seated narcissism is why he can never better himself, as he is unable to admit any failing, and so he continues to find new lows at every turn.

Mostly agree with your post. Minor note: hedonism is inherently self-serving, placing personal pleasure as the highest good. This is more than someone who just wants to "have a silly fun weird good time" or the like. It is a philosophy. The narcissism you are describing is the natural outworking of Nick pursuing the highest good (his pleasure). Nick is/was a self-described heretical hedonistic Christian after all, though he is realistically only 2 for 3 on that.

The parents you reference (with more regard for their children) have abused substances, but Nick made the conscious philosophical decision to become a hedonist. This is how deep it runs in Nick's mind and it feeds into his libertarian sensibilities as well. There is a also meaningful distinction to be made between addicts and hedonists, but I digress.

Just wanted to emphasize Nick's commitment to himself at the expense of others is complementary to both hedonism and narcissism at their core. Nick just naturally leans toward the more self-serving ideologies.

All of his habits in isolation could've been managed by a better man. There are plenty of respectful hedonists, alcohol enjoyers, executives who do coke on weekends who we never hear about because they understand how to effectively segment their lives. Had Nick possessed some self-control and care for others he could've had it all too. There was nothing stopping him from dumping his kids with the grandparents every now and then and having a fun, sex and drug-fuelled weekend away from the house to cool off, nothing except his narcissistic belief that he knew best, that his needs came before everything else. While he possesses an ability to mimic the characters of others (an ability that is degrading by the day, but nonetheless) he's never shown a capacity to understand why social norms exist and why others follow them. Even now, intervention by his community and government are framed as impositions on HIM, he doesn't seem to grasp the objective circumstance in which they've arisen. He believes that a narrative that plausibly explains the situation will clear his name because he can't seem to conceptualise the existence of facts independent of his narrative.

Unsure what you mean by "managed". Executives who do coke on weekends usually aren't responsible parents of five kids (work all week and then doing coke on weekends means less family time). Additionally, we hear enough about executives doing coke enough for it to be a pop-culture staple (let alone the associated depictions of narcissism).

Generally speaking, people aren't as clever as they think they are when it comes to hiding their vices, let alone segmenting that part of their lives without some distance from others and a fair amount of dishonesty.

Ultimately, Nick's hedonistic/narcissistic lifestyle was incompatible with being an aging responsible parent of five children. This is a contributing factor as to why Nick was in (midlife) crisis and why he has proven to be so irresponsible. Honestly, even if someone were still in college (or an executive), it would be difficult to recommend that they get into heavy drinking, hard drug use, and casual sex (or hookers), if even for only health reasons. Moving on...

If successfully "segmenting their lives" means "we never hear about [it]", then Nick's biggest crime was getting caught. I don't think this is what you were necessarily intending to say, but Nick would agree with this sentiment. To Nick's mind, it isn't about what Nick did or didn't do. It is about what "the government" can prove he did.

For example, according to Nick, no one has driven while impaired until they were convicted. The distinction between being legally impaired due to being caught by police and the biological impact alcohol has on the human body (regardless of police presence) is lost here.

To put it another way, Nick seems to think that a tree falling in the woods only makes a sound if convicted in a court of law.



The objective circumstance you refer to runs counter to this mindset. It is a very legalistic standpoint. Inherently both very defensive and very narrow. Nick's is reasoning like the caliber of lawyer he is... and to a man with only a hammer, everything is a nail.
 
Back