Furry Fandom and Drama General

Onlyfans couple behind furry fetish videos reveal friends have abandoned them

Screenshot(sorry Im a phone nigger so deal with it)
chrome_screenshot_Jun 21, 2024 4_15_28 PM CST.png
Click to expand...
Women on Onlyfans really are the most retarded of the female species.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, YourDadIsAMothed, Coo Coo Bird and 7 others
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, Coo Coo Bird, AnthonyLoggerhead and 8 others
Apologies to the mod for not spotting the NSFW tag on my post. I honestly wasn't looking that hard and didn't think google news had porn in its feed
 
California Newt said:
I'm glad that you were able to pick up on that, and I'm happy that I can teach you fun new phrases that you can use to speak out loud in real life.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah I'll make sure to include it with other words I use irl, like "humeme" and "glow in the dark cia niggers".
To be clear, I don't mean bodybuilders necessarily so much as just not drawn to look like women or adolescents.
> draw a girl, call it a boy
is a meme for a reason.

I'm obviously not saying that "normal" gays can't be pedophiles too, of course.
Click to expand...
I can't help but notice you seem to keep conflating women and little boys together... I just think that's really funny for a gay to keep doing.
 
  • Dumb
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TittlyWinks ;) and California Newt
Nonronic said:
I can't help but notice you seem to keep conflating women and little boys together... I just think that's really funny for a gay to keep doing.
Click to expand...
You're calling me a pedophile, so I should clarify that I'm specifically saying the opposite of what you're implying:

"Femboys" are typically drawn  either as close to adult women  or as closer to adolecent boys. Same with "traps". The two seem to have had their meanings confused at some point. I'm saying that there are two ways of drawing them, not that they're the same in my mind. Neither version is for me (or you, I assume).

I apologize for assuming that you were familiar with the subject matter. I mean that non-sarcastically.

@Man In A Dress that Carpetwurm guy just needs to get out of that community entirely, but it seems like he's already in the rocky process of doing that. The detrans-kink angle is interesting, but obviously misguided.

This stuff can take years.

A lot of guys convert to something or go right-leaning and think they need to start immediately attacking what they left without getting enough distance to find new bearings first. It just becomes an excuse to keep engaging with the thing they were supposed to be leaving. It's an easy thing to fall back into, but I think most grow out of it.
 
Last edited:
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
  • Agree
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, Toolbox, RefurbishedApparatus and 6 others
California Newt said:
You're calling me a pedophile, so I should clarify that I'm specifically saying the opposite of what you're implying:
Click to expand...
The conversation contextualized that you weren't attracted to women nor little boys, and that I specifically interpreted that. I wasn't suggesting you were conflating them by logic of "boys are like women", I was poking fun and suggesting it was by logic of "women are like children" because [insert Josh rant about how gay men hate women etc etc].
"Femboys" are typically drawn  either as close to adult women  or as closer to adolecent boys. Same with "traps". The two seem to have had their meanings confused at some point. I'm saying that there are two ways of drawing them, not that they're the same in my mind. Neither version is for me (or you, I assume).

I apologize for assuming that you were familiar with the subject matter. I mean that non-sarcastically
Click to expand...
Nah I understand the nuance of it, I'm just cyberbullying you is all. Just a little ball-busting. No homo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers and California Newt
Man In A Dress said:
Carpetwurm recently posted some male furry art with the text "You will never be a woman". This is his autistic attempt to sound sexually degrading.
Despite trying to bait with the YWNBAW phrase, troons hurt his feelings and he plays up being the victim.
Click to expand...
It's completely 100% ok and acceptable to have a hate fetish for females. To degrade females in furry porn and talk about how shitty they are as a woman or how they'll only be useful for breeding and that's it. Completely acceptable fetish.

But as soon as you come in with a hate fetish for trans people, IT'S COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE, even though it's a fetish for people to degrade females for the sex that they are (even going so far as to say they should be null by removing their sex characteristics and gender identity). Trannies often have the hate fetish for females in porn btw. Both TIFs and TIMs
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Myrtle the Turtle, 90 Seconds, Cat Phuckers and 16 others
Nonronic said:
The conversation contextualized that you weren't attracted to women
Click to expand...
That's an understandable assumption, but I never said that. If it were thread relevant, I'd be describing hetero stuff instead. I'm much more attracted to women.

Nonronic said:
Nah I understand the nuance of it, I'm just cyberbullying you is all. Just a little ball-busting. No homo.
Click to expand...
No worries.

Equal Rights for Androids said:
But as soon as you come in with a hate fetish for trans people, IT'S COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE
Click to expand...
Which is funny because a lot of them are into that. One of the most effective things you can do when talking to one is refuse to humor the idea that they believe what they're saying ("I won't argue with you, that'd just be enabling you to LARP harder as someone who holds that position"), and it makes sense that that translates sexually.

Seen it with both TiMs and TiFs.

The only reason it's "unacceptable" to acknowledge that is probably that it could throw a wrench in the grooming operation. That's explicitly what this guy is trying to do by saying that you don't need to transition to be found attractive, but IMO that's not as helpful as he thinks it is.

It's still feeding their narcissistic supply with sexual attention from other men, and younger guys are going to get more of that if they troon to some extent. That's a big part of why it happens; they're not just looking to not be lonely, or to be wanted. They're looking to be worshipped (a lot of them anyhow). Yeah you can still be attractive without it, but not at the magnitude that their ego is looking for. Gotta starve that out completely.
 
  • Autistic
  • TMI
Reactions: Ookoo Squad, AngryTreeRat, terraform45 and 4 others
Otis Boi said:
He recently joined a friends Discord server.
Click to expand...
Can you elaborate on this?

Equal Rights for Androids said:
It's completely 100% ok and acceptable to have a hate fetish for females. To degrade females in furry porn and talk about how shitty they are as a woman or how they'll only be useful for breeding and that's it. Completely acceptable fetish.

But as soon as you come in with a hate fetish for trans people, IT'S COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE, even though it's a fetish for people to degrade females for the sex that they are (even going so far as to say they should be null by removing their sex characteristics and gender identity). Trannies often have the hate fetish for females in porn btw. Both TIFs and TIMs
Click to expand...
I see it more like trannies having a raging incel jealousy that women have desirable traits/genitals and can get fucked with little to no effort. Never considered it might be a fetish.

It's just really bizarre that he would use a popular memetic phrase like YWNBAW, which is known to piss them off and is considered transphobic by them, and then be surprised when the mentally ill come out to tell him to kys.
Maybe he wants the attention? No idea why you would want these freaks just so you can suddenly whine that you were groomed once and cry victim.
Or maybe the simplest explanation is that he's extremely retarded.
 
California Newt said:
I'm surprised that it's difficult to understand.
Click to expand...
I have no difficulty understanding the appeal of furry porn. I'm not surprised if a guy who looks at hentai takes a look at it. My question should have been "why," not "how:" if that guy is happy looking at hentai, what is the impetus to get into furry stuff beyond a casual glance at Dr. Comet's Krystal? Specifically, getting into it enough to get into the furry lifestyle and act it all out? If that guy is still young, he might just get into it. But if he's older and in a fetish escalation spiral, I'd guess he'd move into hentai with more degrading topics, a downward turn, as opposed to getting into furry, which seems like a left turn toward a different aesthetic. Otherwise, if he's an older guy and not spiraling, it's hard for me to imagine him being essentially peer-pressured into liking furry stuff at anything more than a cursory level. My comments were originally in response to @Corn Flakes' post about how many straight, non-furry guys end up becoming gay furries, and I should have asked what age these guys are. If they're 15, they're grooming victims, if they're 20, they're being foolishly impatient about their lack of success in the normal dating world, and if they're 25, I would think they'd be settled enough in their own habits that they wouldn't respond to manipulation. But I am ignorant of the social dynamic and probably underestimating how lonely these guys are.

I had assumed all furries were driven by a deep-seated fetish, not a socially dependent veneer of one. I thought the fetish preceded the community and was the motivating factor to join it. Therefore, I assumed jailhouse gay furries were just straight guys so consumed by their fetish that, though the ultimate goal was "have straight, furry sex," they were far more willing in practice to compromise on the "straight" aspect than the "furry" aspect. I thought they were getting at least one of the things they wanted, but if many of them don't really want the furry aspect either, if it's just a series of hoops they're jumping through to make having sex possible at all (or even just to have friends), I am moved to pity them. If there are guys out there with whom the following conversation could happen:

A: Are you a gay furry?
B: Yes.
A: So that means you're gay?
B: Well, not really. I just sort of fell into it.
A: But at least you're a furry, right?
B: Well, not really. I just sort of fell into it.
A: But you're a gay furry?
B: Of course! I couldn't imagine not being one.

I can't help but think of them as exemplars of the "tragic clown" trope. Apologies if this is all obvious to everybody else or has been discussed to death already.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, Coo Coo Bird and Ookoo Squad
Equal Rights for Androids said:
It's completely 100% ok and acceptable to have a hate fetish for females. To degrade females in furry porn and talk about how shitty they are as a woman or how they'll only be useful for breeding and that's it. Completely acceptable fetish.

But as soon as you come in with a hate fetish for trans people, IT'S COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE, even though it's a fetish for people to degrade females for the sex that they are (even going so far as to say they should be null by removing their sex characteristics and gender identity). Trannies often have the hate fetish for females in porn btw. Both TIFs and TIMs
Click to expand...
In a sense there's an admission that true and honest women are different in some way, I question the authenticity of their desire to be the other sex if there is such a drive to humiliate and degrade, do they wish to be treated that way or what's going on here?
Just an all around curious case where you'd think that there's a more favorable interaction between I.E. transsexual character and a natal women since they're supposed to be one and the same but in various examples to be found on whatever furnigger goonslop website you look on there's often a dynamic more reminiscent of an abusive male character.

I can only say that this shit's gay and retarded but in a way you can almost read the intent/thought behind the image, they wouldn't commission or draw it if there wasn't some incentive to do so and unless it's like an obvious protest against what is displayed (which doesn't happen because le kinkshaming bad or something) it just portrays what they really want.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cat Phuckers
Man In A Dress said:
Can you elaborate on this?
Click to expand...
A artist friend had him join his server. From my understanding he was immediately antagosic with people as as well as posting that drawing. He was immediately banned. He was warned about his mental instability months ago but lessons learned. From my understanding it happened within the span of a few hours of him being active in the server
Spoonomancer said:
a second discussion on sexuality and fetishes has hit the thread about laughing at furries
Click to expand...
There should be a DEEP THOTS thread for this. It just people jerking each other off about the same 4 talking points that have been around forever.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Toolbox, TroonsDid911, scallion and 5 others
@Lurkin' 'n' Jerkin'
It's fun to make a character for yourself with your autistic buddies online. That's the basic answer. That's all it takes to really be a "furry" other than just a dude with a weird porn habit.

Technically you don't even need the habit, but if that's not for you you're probably not gonna stick around long for obvious reasons.

As far as the social aspect goes, people willing to make a sperg avatar usually have some other stuff in common. Fursona choices are kind of like horoscopes/MTBI, too. If you meet another osprey for example you're probably gonna get along.

The basic core of it isn't really a problem. It's the baggage that comes with the origin and history, plus the problems you get when you put a bunch of spergs together (especially in today's climate).

You could imagine a version without weird sex stuff, but that's not possible right now (at least not on a large scale).

Tl:dr it's a friend matchmaking service for the mentally retarded.
 
Last edited:
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ookoo Squad, Pinball 2000 and Chao Garden
@California Newt
The appeal of the sexual side and of the nonsexual, social side of furries are both intelligible to me; I was just surprised by the idea of people more or less adopting the sexual side for the sake of the social side. The furries I've known have all been sui generis weirdos, so I figured that was the norm. It doesn't sound like there's any more mystery to it than loneliness plus opportunists. Regardless, I should quit bloating up the thread with my "old man confused by furries" posts. I mostly wanted to remark that the idea of the not-gay, not-furry gay furry is very pitiful and very funny. It's like finding out that Mr. Hands didn't actually like horses and just wanted to hang out with the guys at the stable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lavender Moth
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back