The video starts with his usual quirky "haha im dragging around the little character in adobe™ photoshop™, and im going a high pitched voice haha" doing as much to poison the well for his audience within the first three minutes. He will do this multiple times within his video not realizing that setting so many strawmen alight made a new hole in the ozone layer. Five minutes into the video he complains about ad-hominems, like a 14 year old redditor who just discovered logical fallacies. In the middle of his argument he pulls a SweepyIsHere classic and
calls him a grown ass man... Twice... This is on top of ignoring the concept of an aggregate or entirely to which pseudointellectuals like him cannot comprehend whatsoever in favor of easy "gachas". The argument never that they're all like this, the argument is there's a disproportionate level of porn addicts and socially unacceptable sexual behavior within the furry fandom when compared to the general population. Even furries have acknowledged this as a problem.
Nine minutes in the admin of /r/boykisser makes an appearance. For those who don't know,
the admin of /r/boykisser on top of being a pedophile is a legitimate neo-nazi. Really strange that this was never brought up despite this being his most """researched video""". He then brings up
statistics from Osaki A. 2008 which still look real fucking bad, double digit percentages are not a thing to gloss over and 36% of respondents having an ambivalent opinion on the subject at hand can be a telling sign. Even then it comes with this cavoite that this could be a higher or lower number. He clearly just looked at the WikiFur page, saw the sources and said "yep that's it" and looked no further into the papers themselves.
Spoiler: Cavoite from the Osaki A. 2008, Page 26
11. The data on this are rather sparse for a number of reasons, chiefly that "your dog: Hot or Not?" is not a question people seem to feel comfortable answering, and nor is the subject something most research groups feel comfortable investigating. Kinsey's landmark study reported a very high prevalence in some areas, generally rural. On the other hand, WA Alvarez and JP Freinhar always get mentioned (1991: "A Prevalence Study of Bestiality (zoophilia) In Psychiatric In-Patients, Medical InPatients, and Psychiatrict Staff. International Journal of Psychosomatics 38: 45-47) and who am I to be an iconoclast? They say between 10% and 15%; these and other more anecdotal studies appear to suggest something around 10%, which is also a nice round number. Finding out how many zoophiles there are is a task well beyond yours truly and his team of researchers, crack though they be. After that, he talks about machine learning models that Ruben used in his videos. He also tries to claim that
Ruben stole a t-shirt design despite there being multiple listings for
rainbow swirl t-shirts on both Etsy &
Amazon with similar looking designs. As it turns out the rainbow swirl tie dye is a wide spread design and nobody gives a fuck. As for the guy he claimed that Ruben stole the design from,
his main business is selling abstract paintings not t-shirts. At 20 minutes in he goes on the "kiwi farms is le big heckin' baderino" rant. He probably at best went to the Wikipedia article which has been proven to be edited by Liz-Fong Jones and probably read the shitty smear pieces from one of many news outlets if he was feeling like wanting dessert. He then tries to ascribe the forum as only being "
people who pretend to be pedo hunters for the purposes of bullying™". Bro, we're a fucking gossip forum, we like to make fun of people who act retarded on the Internet. That's it. Some of the people we laugh at happen to be gross trannies, furries, pedophiles, etc. But they're retards who act like spastic dipshits and it's fun to laugh at them.
Firstly, that rule that he talked about disingenuously earlier is specifically "Do not tip the cows" that means that you don't directly interact with a lolcow. By
harassment, it is specifically meant that you do not directly interact with the lolcows. Investigating from a distance for the purpose of critique or analysis is not a form of harassment or stalking no matter how mean the words the people say are. The exact same journalists who you regurgitate do this exact shit all the time for their own articles, it's no different with the exception that this is an open forum where anyone can talk shit about someone as long as it's US legal. It is not "harassment" as you claim to aggregate publicly available information about you and archive it, and gossip about you online. What the sharty did can quality as harassment, what we on the forum are doing does not qualify.
As for the claims that this specific thread goes after literally everyone on Ruben with a dissenting opinion. No, this thread is mainly about Ruben Sim's a-logs. In other words, the most deranged anti-Ruben people we can find, such as down syndrome laden zygotes like you, gone_fishinq. I've openly criticized Ruben for taking
Temu as a sponsor and for his stance on taking down his Free Hong Kong video. He then talks about how he was mentioned in a thread back in February about two hours before getting fucked with by the sharty for being friends with a porn artist. He then pulls a Ralph and says "THAT'S NOT TRUUUU" despite not just the
pro shipper video, but also his girlfriend drawing porn and giving him access to said stash when he was a minor. He then claims it was Ruben who perpetuated it, which is false because
it was Breadbassket's follow-up post. You know, the guy who's post you read 10 seconds ago in that video. Also how narcissistic do you have to be to think that a
Cobson meme making fun of porn addicts is directed at you? Not just that, but a post that was made four days later? Then he makes another false claim regarding "harassment" and what that word actually means, because the word "Harassment" has had it's definition so thoroughly diluted that mild criticism can be labeled as harassment.
Continuing forward, he then claims that the shit about his girlfriend being a porn addict are "nawwwt truuu" despite
there being proof that his girlfriend has drawn porn.
[1] [2] Not just any, but gore and vore related pornography. He then goes on to talk about
this particular post on page 79. He then talks about an attempted swatting 29 minutes into the video. This part borders if not out right crosses the line on
Defamation Per Se as it implies Ruben started rumors that led to a crime. Not only could Ruben potentially sue him, but Null could possibly sue as well as it could be argued in court that these words implied that a user of the forum tried to swat him. This is obviously blatantly false because of the mentioned archives above prove that she 100% was and possibly still is drawing furry porn. He then proceeds to talk about everyone's favorite homeless TF2 player, JerseyFurry who antagonized Ruben over a tier list video. No that's not a joke,
JerseyFurry attempted to start shit with Ruben over a tier list video. He then starts obsessing over Ruben's stickers.
He's obsessing over Ruben's fucking stickers.
At this point, I accidently lost the other half, but it'll be in the TL;DR version. I tried an effort post, but I fucked it up half way, sorry guys.
