Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

Stephen King praises another one of Rowling's Strike novels. TRAs mad!
x
View attachment 6118719
"You are 100x the writer JK Rowling is" is so funny given that Stephen King notoriously writes none of his books, for at least 40 years, and even when he was 95% of them are the worst dogshit you've ever read. You can tell these people have never read a Stephen King book.
 
"You are 100x the writer JK Rowling is" is so funny given that Stephen King notoriously writes none of his books, for at least 40 years, and even when he was 95% of them are the worst dogshit you've ever read. You can tell these people have never read a Stephen King book.
He also wrote some books under a pen name to see what critics made of them.

They all thought they were terrible.
 
Fingers crossed they'll devour Stephen King next. Can hardly think of a more deserving target.
How? They can't do shit to him.
That was the time before last. Last time was just like this time - he simply said how much he'd enjoyed the latest Cormoran Strike book, and of course they all chimped out.
My guess is he resented being boolied into cucking out and has now decided just to do it again.
 
harrypotterfuryroad.png
:thinking:
 
How? They can't do shit to him.

My guess is he resented being boolied into cucking out and has now decided just to do it again.

He is pushing 80, is fucking wealthy, and certainly doesn’t give a shit if popular media mocks him mercilessly.

A good portion of his books which became films also are self parodies.

I can’t see what he has to fear from Gen Z and millennial men in dresses armed with Twitter accounts.

He really is a holdout from a generation that included Hunter Thompson, Oliver Reed, fucking Nixon, Oliver North, Tim Curry, Quentin Crisp, Sean Connery the aforementioned Woody Allen and a hell of a lot of other white wealthy and powerful men who publicly did shameful shit, but essentially got away with it cause they didn’t especially care what the public reaction was, or used their influence and fuck you money to fuck it off.

I know that post MeToo they think that wealthy white men can now be brought down, but you have to have some serious shit that sticks.

Maybe woody Allen isn’t making films about being a loveable neurotic New York Jewish guy anymore, but it’s not like he is in jail or in poverty.

That’s the worst that King can expect, so he justifiably thinks, bring it on.
 
That was the time before last. Last time was just like this time - he simply said how much he'd enjoyed the latest Cormoran Strike book, and of course they all chimped out.
Ah well good for him then.

It's kinda funny seeing the theythem seething and telling him off for "platforming" Rowling. They have no idea what many of the words they parrot even mean. They are like medieval Christians mumbling along in Latin.
 
He is pushing 80, is fucking wealthy, and certainly doesn’t give a shit if popular media mocks him mercilessly.
He does though, it's why he buckled in the first place. He has always spent a lot of time complaining about how the critics dismiss him, he's considered pulpy, it happens to all his stand-ins. The richard bachman experiment was to get the critics to unknowingly praise him (which some did) and he talks about that in On Writing. He really hates that he's rich but never cool whereas JKR was rich and popular for her intended audience and then some. Everyone got in on it. We've all been soaking in it for so long that we've forgotten how crazy it is that fucking Harvard has a quidditch team. Stephen King has nothing on the HP extended universe. He wishes he could be her.

If you read On Writing, there's two things that come up a few times: him hating how his writing teacher / classmates couldn't write anything that wasn't deliberately allegorical of current politics, rather than just telling a good story, and him feeling that his generation wasted their chance at real political change and that eventually new young people won't make the same mistake. (JKR has deliberate political allegories in her books but also a good story). Which is why when all the young people started yelling at him he assumed he must be wrong, but also why I did expect him to turn back eventually.
 
He does though, it's why he buckled in the first place. He has always spent a lot of time complaining about how the critics dismiss him, he's considered pulpy, it happens to all his stand-ins.

Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King. - Harold Bloom
 
I don't think this is ritualistic matricide. The root of their anger is because they haven't grown out of Harry Potter or otherwise left it behind. They can't. Who they are is what they consoom. Case in point:
we've forgotten how crazy it is that fucking Harvard has a quidditch team
What the actual fuck.

Anyway. They cannot let go. They won't move out of mom's/JK Rowling's basement.
 
Looks like the play is off.

Protect Free Speech! Petition to Peter Schaufuss, St Stephen's Church (Change.org)

TERF is now set to be REMOVED from its venue. Peter Schaufuss, owner of St Stephen’s Church, had demanded that the show be exempted from the programme citing a clause in his contract with the venue manager. This happened the same day Rowling entered the conversation on X with a lighthearted challenge that India Willoughby be cast as her in the play. Could this be after an accurate Telegraph article was released in which we gave the writer an exclusive first read of the script, which was judged to be ‘impressively even-handed’?

Meanwhile Rowling has made quite a lot of noise leaning against Labour to finally get a grasp on the issues instead of dismissing them. Maddeningly, the more she makes it clear that this isn't about her and she asks for nothing, the more the press makes it about her and TRAs called her power-mad etc...

1719332923164.png


I'll be happy to meet after @NoXYinXXprisons , @LesbianLabour , @WomensRightsNet , @Womans_Place_UK and @AllianceLGB have been given in person meetings with the Labour leadership. I'd also like to know whether @AngelaRayner still considers the last two organisations hate groups - asking on behalf of female survivors of domestic violence and gay people who don't subscribe to gender identity ideology.

1719333059286.png

She's not agreed to a meeting obviously. Her response really meant "it's not me you need to meet with".


1719333287854.png


A terrorist org that is not doing anything and not demanding anything.
 
Kier's lying. The shadow education secretary let it slip on Sunday that they're going to roll back what little the Tories did about it in school and Kier's trying to pretend that won't actually happen.
And like true professionals they specifically use the venue and its owners name while begging people to do something about it. Interestingly they talk about how "TERF" began without ever once mentioning "TERF Cunt" as it was titled. I suspect something the venue owner was also not told.
 
Kier Starmer seems like the biggest two-faced weasel I have ever seen (even for a politician). He refuses to take a stance on anything which might affect his polling numbers and phrases his "opinions" in the most powder-fisted way possible.
 
GQ5wEoNWQAAKBs0.jpg


#IStandAgainstJKRowling was full out trending today on Britbongish Twatter.


So, let's see some spicy non arguments and unfunny memes putting words in JK Rowling's mouth from trannies and their handmaidens

Screenshot 2024-06-25 214945.png

Rowling doesn't give a fuck about what gets your rocks off but like any other sane person but she would argue that an male and a female having sexual relations, no matter how the male identifies, is anything but "lesbian".

Screenshot 2024-06-25 214953.png


JK Rowling: I don't think male born people should be allowed into intimate female spaces. They are also more likely to commit sex crime. It's wrong to transition minors, especially vulnerable ones, who are under 18

TRAS: OMG EVIL TERF LADY SAID SHE THINKS ALL TRANS PEOPLE ARE RAPISTS AND PEDOS!!! SHE WANTS TO GENOCIDE TRANS PEOPLE AND DENY THEM THE RIGHT TO TRANSITION!

Screenshot 2024-06-25 214938.png

JK Rowling: No women should be discriminated because of her sex and sex specific protections for women must not be dismantled in the name of gender ideology. Men and women are very sexually dimorphic, not just with their genitals.

TRAS: OMG! So you want to define women simply by their genitals?!?! :mad:
Screenshot 2024-06-25 215306.png

JK Rowling: Sensible and logical arguments backed with facts and research against tra talking points

TRAS, handmaidens, trannies: hurr durr haha terfs are farts get it fart hurr durr


Screenshot 2024-06-25 222232.png

I read this as: Trans delusions are more important than women's safety and concerns


Screenshot 2024-06-25 215941.png

So because she's a millionaire she doesn't deserve to have her opinion voiced? And for the millionth time, no, trans "lesbians" are not lesbians you closeted bisexual tranny chaser.
 
Last edited:
Screenshot 2024-06-25 215306.png

TRAS, handmaidens, trannies: hurr durr haha terfs are farts get it fart hurr durr
Why do they want to use this "TERFs are FARTs" thing when we already know that trannies love farts? They donated hundreds of thousands of dollars so that Keffals could make fart porn. They buy Keffals' fart porn. They post fart and shit videos wearing their lolicon diapers. All they're really saying with "terfs are farts" is that they desperately want to have sex with the lesbians who do not consent to sex with them (because they love to have sex with farts).
 
Batshit Scottish parliamentary candidate Sophie Molly who I update about every now and then on the "Tranny Sideshows" thread at the moment is now demanding to be present at the hypothetical meeting. It's just fascinating that a homeless junky demands things like that - the moment you identify as trans you get a boundless supply of entitlement.

1719357734236.png

@RachelReevesMP I formally demand to be present at this meeting. I'm a trans woman candidate in the GE and I should be present to represent trans people.
 
Back