Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

[Oliver Onions]

Apologies for the double post, but the new bizarre fantasy of the day is that there are going to be criminal charges because of the Cass Review.

View attachment 6107652

Oh we're definitely approaching criminal repercussions for those who knew the risks and ignored them, but it's gonna be for all the medical professionals who prescribed blockers, HRT and SRS to kids and teens while knowing there was, at best, no substantial evidence it improved their condition and knowing (by virtue of how linear time works) there are absolutely zero long-term studies about the effects these treatments do have on kids and young people.

It's only recently they've finally started to admit puberty blockers aren't reversible, something that was obvious to even a layman with a working brain, so I can only imagine the horrors that are going to come out over time and I hope all these people suffer to the full extent of the law for what they have done to vulnerable people.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

A new problem with Tony's conspiracy theory. Its not even certain the deaths at issue were suicide.

Another glaring problem with Tony's conspiracy are sections 15.36 - 15.43 of the Final Report that discuss suicide and suicidality in minute detail.

Most problematic of all for Tony et al is the conclusion in section 15.43 of the Final Report which states (and idenfities the problem of irresponsible ignorant clowns like Tony):

15.43 In summary, the evidence does not adequately support the claim that gender affirming treatment reduces suicide risk. However, the distress is real for these children and young people, some of whom hold strong beliefs about the efficacy of both puberty blockers and masculinising/feminising hormones. This will be exacerbated by long
waits to be seen in specialist gender services with only internet and peer group sources of support and information, and without access to clinical advice on the range of available options to manage their distress. Thus, fear that delayed
access to medical treatment may lead to suicidal thoughts and behaviours remains high in parents and clinicians, and this is regardless of how effective the treatments may be once accessed.

 

[King Dead]

A new problem with Tony's conspiracy theory. Its not even certain the deaths at issue were suicide.

View attachment 6113891

Another glaring problem with Tony's conspiracy are sections 15.36 - 15.43 of the Final Report that discuss suicide and suicidality in minute detail.

Most problematic of all for Tony et al is the conclusion in section 15.43 of the Final Report which states (and idenfities the problem of irresponsible ignorant clowns like Tony):

15.43 In summary, the evidence does not adequately support the claim that gender affirming treatment reduces suicide risk. However, the distress is real for these children and young people, some of whom hold strong beliefs about the efficacy of both puberty blockers and masculinising/feminising hormones. This will be exacerbated by long
waits to be seen in specialist gender services with only internet and peer group sources of support and information, and without access to clinical advice on the range of available options to manage their distress. Thus, fear that delayed
access to medical treatment may lead to suicidal thoughts and behaviours remains high in parents and clinicians, and this is regardless of how effective the treatments may be once accessed.

Gee, who could have guessed that kids being surrounded by online echo chambers blaring at them that not transitioning early will make them want to kill themselves once they go through the "wrong" puberty, then not immediately getting what they have been indoctrinated into wanting would lead to psychological distress? It's almost like troons are deliberately psychologically abusing children to create the next batch of troons that won't leave the cult because they believe that the whole world is out to get them.

A fair number of these notes seem to be post-2020 as well, when all children's mental states were at their lowest due to the major disruption the coof had in their lives. But I'm sure these suicides had everything to do with the troons not getting their titty skittles on time.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

This is an objectively false statement by any metric. Tony has unilateraly deprived his son of having a father in his life in favor of indulging a narcicistic sexual fetish while likewise trying to erase that actual mother while skin walking as her with his prison gay boyfriend.

Look at degenrate Zack using the term "our kid." What a depraved sicko!

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Apolologies for the double post but this complete fucking retard thinks two Republicans are going to vote in favor of troonerey. Things are not going to go your way Snaggle Tooth. What is absolutely going to happen is every favorable result you have achieved is going to be reversed in line with the 6th Circuit and the 11th Circuit.

One super easy way to tell that Tony is on the losing side is the case that was accepted was from the DOJ. Kate Strangios two cases were rejected.

Another easy tell, is the SCOTUS has never deemed troons to be a suspect class or quasi suspect class and the trannies do not have the votes from them to do so for the first time now.

Another easy tell is it is going to be Donald Trump's solicitor general arguing the case who will concede the state bans were correct.

SCOTUS actually rejected the cases brought by troons. Yet somehow our favorite retarded blogger thinks that he is on the winning side.

Its somewhat conceivable that Ketanji "Not a Biologist" Jackson gets asked to sit this one out because of her confirmation hearing testimony which would mean that Snaggle Tooth would have to pull three conservatives to the troonery side instead of just two. Assuming the diversity hire remains on the case, we already know the outcome. Its Dobbs 2.0 with a 6-3 split and the troons lose.

Bostock is irrelevant to this pending case as it explictly states the ruling is retricted to Title VII. Moreover, Ginsburg's vote on the Bostock case has flipped via Justice Barrett making the outcome the exact opposite if decided today. Furthermore, there is ZERO CHANCE that Roberts and Gorsuch will vote in favor of child troonery.

Even Tony's wildly incompetent legal advisor sees the writing on the walls.

Tony sperging on the Dobbs decision, finding it to be a product of "systemic racism"

Two years since Dobbs and where we stand.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

I just can't figure out if Jolyon Maugham is completely delusional or a fantastically cynical grifter.

In addition to what Not Dr. Evil posted, through that one article is a link to this blog that's pretty much dedicated to exposing his operation as a grift: https://labourpainsblog.com/

Their latest post indicates that they're going where the money is:



But also Maugham has a trans kid.

Why would Goursch need to reverse himself and bring Roberts with him to rule on a case that has nothing to do with the other one?

Tony, my man, you need to read Bostock or just somebody explaining Goursch's ruling in it. There's no mention of trans people at all. The reasoning in it couldn't remotely apply to this new case. One reason why? Men and women are different sexes.

 

[AMHOLIO]

Snaggle Tooth seems to think so.

View attachment 6110444

I want names. I want names, faces, dates, and confirmation that delayed transitioning was the main factor, not just a part of it, but the main factor. Just cut it out unless you have a provable trail of bodies left behind.

It's almost like troons are deliberately psychologically abusing children to create the next batch of troons that won't leave the cult because they believe that the whole world is out to get them.

I wonder if Erin Reed does this consciously or unconsciously? He is a narcissist, he might just do this natrually without thinking since it worked for him in the past.

But also Maugham has a trans kid.

That's always the saddest thing. Parents will be in deep denial about it being wrong because no one wants to admit they fucked with their child's biochemistry for no reason.

 

[a hapless toad]

Tony, my man, you need to read Bostock or just somebody explaining Goursch's ruling in it. There's no mention of trans people at all. The reasoning in it couldn't remotely apply to this new case. One reason why? Men and women are different sexes.

My friend, have YOU read it?

9 BOSTOCK v. CLAYTON COUNTY
Opinion of the Court

The statute’s message for our cases is equally simple and momentous: An individual’s homosexuality or transgender status is not relevant to employment decisions. That’s because it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex. Consider, for example, an employer with two employees, both of whom are attracted to men. The two individuals are, to the employer’s mind, materially identical in all respects, except that one is a man and the other a woman. If the employer fires the male employee for no reason other than the fact he is attracted to men, the employer discriminates against him for traits or actions it tolerates in his female colleague. Put differently, the employer intentionally singles out an employee to fire based in part on the employee’s sex, and the affected employee’s sex is a but-for cause of his discharge.
Or take an employer who fires a transgender person who was identified as a male at birth but who now identifies as a female. If the employer retains an otherwise identical employee who was identified as female at birth, the employer intentionally penalizes a person identified as male at birth for traits or actions that it tolerates in an employee identified as female at birth. Again, the individual employee’s sex plays an unmistakable and impermissible role in the discharge decision.

 

[TheBigZee]

Furthermore, there is ZERO CHANCE that Roberts and Gorsuch will vote in favor of child troonery.

Technically they're ruling on equal protection. This will extend to birth certificates and possibly state sponsored sports.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Technically they're ruling on equal protection. This will extend to birth certificates and possibly state sponsored sports.

And the troons are going to lose because they have to prove pretextual animus. Sex based discrimination (Bostock) is not enough after Dobbs.

The Constitution makes no reference to troonery and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be “deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) 597 U.S. 215, 231.

First, procuring troon care is not a fundamental constitutional right because such a right has no basis in the Constitution's text or in our Nation's history. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) 597 U.S. 215, 300.

Second, a law regulating troonery, like other health and welfare laws, is entitled to a “strong presumption of validity". "" It must be sustained if there is a rational basis on which the legislature could have thought that it would serve legitimate state interests." Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) 597 U.S. 215, 301.

Third, "The regulation of a medical procedure that only one sex can undergo does not trigger heightened constitutional scrutiny unless the regulation is a “mere pretex[t] designed to effect an invidious discrimination against members of one sex or the other.” Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) 597 U.S. 215, 236.

Finally, Mr. Airdropshitposts is correct. Bostock is irrelevant here.

"Under Title VII, too, we do not purport to address bathrooms, locker rooms, or anything else of the kind. The only question before us is whether an employer who fires someone simply for being homosexual or transgender has discharged or otherwise discriminated against that individual “because of such individual's sex.” Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia (2020) 590 U.S. 644, 681.

This made me laugh because Glucksberg is a substantive due process test. It is NOT an equal protection test as Captain Retard-O claims.

 

[a hapless toad]

Finally, Mr. Airdropshitposts is correct. Bostock is irrelevant here.

"Under Title VII, too, we do not purport to address bathrooms, locker rooms, or anything else of the kind. The only question before us is whether an employer who fires someone simply for being homosexual or transgender has discharged or otherwise discriminated against that individual “because of such individual's sex.” Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia (2020) 590 U.S. 644, 681.

I didn't disagree that it's irrelevant, but it DOES mention transgender people, which is why Tony and the US vs Skrmetti petition keep bringing it up despite it only applying to Title VII.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

I didn't disagree that it's irrelevant, but it DOES mention transgender people, which is why Tony and the US vs Skrmetti petition keep bringing it up despite it only applying to Title VII.

Another Bostock limitation that makes it silly for the troons to rely on is the language "SOLELY BECAUSE OF." Not a single troon ban exists "solely because of " (troonery) which takes the issue out of Bostocks scope regardless.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

My friend, have YOU read it?

I didn't disagree that it's irrelevant, but it DOES mention transgender people, which is why Tony and the US vs Skrmetti petition keep bringing it up despite it only applying to Title VII.

Okay, so I forgot it mentions them to explicitly say why they're irrelevant to the ruling.

 

[a hapless toad]

Okay, so I forgot it mentions them to explicitly say why they're irrelevant to the ruling.

Airdrop, I love you much, but I feel like you are being deliberately obtuse here. Transgender status was absolutely relevant to the Bostock ruling. The fact that it's restricted to Title VII SHOULD render it irrelevant to these recent cases yet that's not what these morons are claiming; however, saying that it's entirely irrelevant in all rulings, including Bostock, (which is how I am reading your posts, please correct me if I am wrong) is disingenuous.

Also please have some levity:

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Airdrop, I love you much, but I feel like you are being deliberately obtuse here. Transgender status was absolutely relevant to the Bostock ruling. The fact that it's restricted to Title VII SHOULD render it irrelevant to these recent cases yet that's not what these morons are claiming; however, saying that it's entirely irrelevant in all rulings, including Bostock, (which is how I am reading your posts, please correct me if I am wrong) is disingenuous.

I think Goursch's reasoning is long but entirely to the point: all this various stuff is irrelevant because what matters is sex. A man dressing like a woman isn't discrimination against transgender people because it's discrimination against a male on the basis of sex. It's fine for a woman to do it, so it should be fine for a man to do it. It either has to be fine for neither or both.

I don't see how this reasoning can be leveraged in the other cases because they're specifically asking for disparate treatment based on sex. (Combined with proclaimed religious beliefs.)

You were still entirely correct that I was wrong to say it was not mentioned.

 

[Oliver Onions]

Gee, who could have guessed that kids being surrounded by online echo chambers blaring at them that not transitioning early will make them want to kill themselves once they go through the "wrong" puberty, then not immediately getting what they have been indoctrinated into wanting would lead to psychological distress? It's almost like troons are deliberately psychologically abusing children to create the next batch of troons that won't leave the cult because they believe that the whole world is out to get them.

What they're doing to kids in these Discords reminds me a lot of what the media/society has done to black communities regarding the cops. I could never understand why the first instinct of so many black people when confronted with the cops is to charge at them, go for their gun or just generally do something guaranteed to get your ass shot. Eventually I realised I don't get it because I was raised on the belief you should do whatever a cop tells you, not out of respect but because they can and will ruin your life if they want to. Meanwhile, black kids are raised to believe the cops are out there literally hunting them for sport and will shoot them for absolutely no reason, a fantasy constantly re-enforced by the media and their communities, as well as the lionization of every amateur thug who dies in police custody for being a fucking retard. When that's all you ever hear your entire life it's easy to see why you'd be terrified of cops.

All that is to say it's the exact same thing being done to 'trans' kids: the media, society, celebrities, every facet of our culture is constantly telling these kids transition is the only solution to how you're feeling --because as we all know a teenager feeling alien in their body is a concept wholly unique to being trans-- and if you don't transition it's ogre for you and you may as well be dead.

I'm hoping we're at the turning point now because anti-trans voices are being given much more of a platform than in the last few years so kids can see that actually there are alternatives, (I also think kids are generally getting bored of the fad,) but we're still a long way from unfucking everything these freaks have fucked up.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Matt is right. Tony is an abuser.




After months of Tony denying that anyone was trying to "trans the kids" we now know that targeting children for troonerey was office Biden administation policy.

From Jesse Singal:

The document is titled “Appendix A To Supplemental Expert Report Of James Cantor, Ph.D. In it Cantor, a Canadian sex researcher, critic of youth gender medicine, and frequent expert witness on behalf of those attempting to ban or or restrict it (including in this case), claims that “Assistant Secretary for Health Dr. Rachel Levine strongly pressured WPATH leadership to rush the development and issuance of SOC-8, in order to assist with Administration political strategy.”

He backs this claim up with the following internal communications from WPATH members involved with the creation of the SoC 8 (here and elsewhere in the document, the names of the people who wrote the words in question are redacted):

I have just spoken to Admiral Levine today, who—as always is extremelysupportive of the SOC 8, but also very eager for its release—so to ensureintegration in the US health policies of the Biden government. So, let’s crack onwith the job!!!

I am meeting with Rachel Levine and her team next week, as the US Department of Health is very keen to bring the trans health agenda forward.

The failure of WPATH to be ready with SOC 8 is proving a barrier to optimal policy progress and she [Dr. Levine] was eager to learn when SOC 8 might be published.

[T]his should be taken as a charge from the United States government to do what is required to complete the project immediately.

More worryingly, Cantor charges that “Assistant Secretary Levine also attempted to and did influence the substantive content of SOC-8, based on political goals rather than science. Specifically, Assistant Secretary Levine, though [sic] a staff member, pressured WPATH to remove recommended minimum ages for medical transition treatments from SOC-8.”

Unsealed Court Documents Show That Admiral Rachel Levine Pressured WPATH To Remove Age Guidelines From The Latest Standards Of Care

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Sorry, I already saw that debunked on trans Twitter:


Also another example of the NYT going full fash:

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Sorry, I already saw that debunked on trans Twitter:
View attachment 6128625View attachment 6128627View attachment 6128628View attachment 6128630View attachment 6128632

Also another example of the NYT going full fash:
View attachment 6128637View attachment 6128639

Pretty sure that Amaya Deakin is the very same retard who told the Arkansas federal court that biological science is inherently unrelieable and that the only reliable metric is one's "gender identity."


That's pretty grandiose and somethat narcissistic claim there Snaggle Tooth.

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

Tony, journalists are supposed to try to remove their biases when reporting on an issue. Just because today's "journalists" cannot do that doesn't mean anything. A good journalist can report on things they have no experience with, because they've researched the issue and consulted with experts on the subject..

Take Ronan Farrow's book on Weinstein/me too. He has no direct experience with sexual abuse, yet wrote a gripping and fair book on the subject. That's journalism.

What you do is write "articles" through the lens of a narcissistic tranny. Which is fine, it's a free country, but it's not journalism. If it was even "journalism," as practiced by Ben Collins and Taylor Lorenez, you'd be able to get published somewhere.