Which race or ethnicity has the lowest sexual dimorphism?

Which race or ethnicity has the lowest sexual dimorphism?


  • Total voters
    112

Stephanie Bustcakes

J. Clay Rowling
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jun 23, 2016
From my perspective, it's gotta be Asians, especially when they're young. Both the men and the women have soft, round facial features that make them look feminine. (This is just in general, of course. Just because you can find pictures of some outliers won't disprove my point.) But that's just what I've perceived. What are your thoughts?
 
I agree re asians having low sexual dimorphism but I never really understood why people thought they looked feminine. I feel like the lack of curves, small eyes, large faces etc. seem pretty masculine in a twinky way.
Natives. They're all round on top, sticks on the bottom, long haired and drunk/high. Like you stand a row of them facing away from you and you'll never tell which are women and which are men. They'll all just look like indistinct blob shaped people-like things.
Also agree with this, but aren't they pretty closely related to asians? I feel like they have low dimorphism for similar reasons (except they tend to be fatter).
 
I've seen some pics of female Australian Aboriginals, and they seem to have more facial hair than the females of other races? My goodness...
It's true you don't see many abbo women. And in fact, they are so alike in voice and appearance, that they are often mistaken for abbo men. And this in turn has given rise to the belief that there are no abbo women, and that abbos just spring out of holes in the ground!
 
Australian Aboriginals easily. I have no idea why but it's not that unusual to come across women (usually older) with facial hair and even full beards. And that's not even considering that the facial features between men and women are basically identical unless there's some mixed ancestry.


Abo.JPG
 
Last edited:
Asians, a hundred percent. They have little sexual dimorphism because they have little sexual expression (small breasts, small penis, little body hair, little difference in height/frame/musculature). There's a reason thai trannies are the only ones that pass and it's not just plastic surgery and makeup, they're all a blank canvas from the start because they barely develop male features. Asians are like scaled up children -- which probably has something to do with their propensity for pedophilia, and the overlap if weeaboos and pedophiles.

This has interesting implications because sexual dimorphism is a hallmark of tournament species, whereas the absence of it is the hallmark of a pair bonding species. Tournament species have an unbalanced ratio of sexes, have high intrasexual competition and thus high incidence of violence, are nonmonogamous as dominant males breed with multiple partners, males don't take part in raising offspring -- basically, niggers. Pair bonding species are the opposite, with low intrasexual competition, low rates of violence, monogamy, and coparenting. The running hypothesis in human behavioral biology is that humans are in the process of evolving from a tournament species to a pair bonding species; which, if true, would mean the bugman is unfortunately the next step in human evolution, and the nips and gooks are on the bleeding edge, and we should be paying attention and taking note of the pitfalls that are destroying their birthrate and causing their extinction.

Natives. They're all round on top, sticks on the bottom, long haired and drunk/high. Like you stand a row of them facing away from you and you'll never tell which are women and which are men. They'll all just look like indistinct blob shaped people-like things.
Fat people don't count, being fat wreaks havoc on the endocrine system and practically turns you intersex, that's why genderblobs are genderblobs.

It's true you don't see many abbo women. And in fact, they are so alike in voice and appearance, that they are often mistaken for abbo men. And this in turn has given rise to the belief that there are no abbo women, and that abbos just spring out of holes in the ground!
It's the beards
 
I've seen some pics of female Australian Aboriginals, and they seem to have more facial hair than the females of other races? My goodness...

Australian Aboriginals easily. I have no idea why but it's not that unusual to come across women (usually older), with facial hair and even full beards. And that's not even considering that the facial features between men and women are basically identical unless there's some mixed ancestry.


View attachment 6137083
I don't know how the particular Denisovan alleles all contribute to this, but Australian Aboriginals are about the closest to a completely non-Sapiens Homo species that exist in the modern day.

I have to believe that this significantly contributes to their unique and easily identifiable appearance and extremely low IQ (regardless of testing methodology).

Galton estimated the intelligence of the Australian Aborigines at approximately three grades below that of the English, giving them an IQ at 68.8, a little higher than the figure of 62 derived from intelligence tests proposed by Lynn (2006).

1719695905183.png
 
Fat people don't count, being fat wreaks havoc on the endocrine system and practically turns you intersex, that's why genderblobs are genderblobs.
But what if fat is the standard shape they come in and 99% of all the ones you're likely to in counter are in fact fat?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: dick brain
Back