- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
I'm actually surprised the media has standards enough not to just run what some weirdos on Twitter claim without first contacting the NHS.Probably becuase this is a non-story Big Al.
Alejandra Caraballo / Alex Caraballo / @Esqueer_ - Twitter trans rights activist, cyberlaw teacher who doesn't understand cyberlaw, mass flaggot, humiliated in congress by a real woman.
- Thread starter A1 Steak Sauce
- Start date
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
You don't have room to talk Lurch!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Elon is like the other Fat Alex, he got his fat tits reduced but then gained all the other fat back.
Big Straight Al got his tits enlarged, so he looks ridiculous in a different way from Elon.
Both fat fucks who can't read, though.
Big Straight Al got his tits enlarged, so he looks ridiculous in a different way from Elon.
Both fat fucks who can't read, though.
behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
LMAO. Alex stormed off yelling "I WON'T TALK TO THE MEDIA," and the media said "Who was that fat guy and what was he yelling about?" and then moved on, and now Alex has to come back and remind them that he is totally not talking to them, for real, he's LEAVING.
Reminds me of when a kid runs off to their room and slams the door, and the parents just ignore it, so the kid comes back out and then slams the door again.
I bet all the major "news tips" Alex has been sitting on are things like "LibsOfTikTok sent a new mean tweet" and "someone laughed at me on a dating site again"
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
That's weird, maybe you shouldn't be peddling "exclusives" and imposing conditions on journalists if they're major stories everyone needs to know about.
Chickenpolar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2023
Hilarious he tweets that a day before the NY Time published the piece about Admiral Levine pressuring WPATH to drop age limits in their guidelines.
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
New from misogynist Fat Dumb Gay Al -
"EVERYTHING I DON'T LIKE IS CHAYA RAICHICK's FAULT"
Rising Online Hate, Rising Offline Violence
The persistent fear-mongering, hate, and scapegoating of LGBTQ people and the LGBTQ community is harmful and dangerous, and is inciting violence against the community. Just in the last few weeks, several prominent anti-LGBTQ social media accounts have praised and glorified burning and destroying Pride flags, which is inciting a nationwide escalation of vandalism and violence against Pride imagery in public. Last year, a shop owner who attempted to stop a Pride flag on her storefront from being defaced was murdered. The perpetrator was found to have an X (formerly Twitter) account that featured a pinned post of a burning Pride flag. What happens online does not stay there.
The coordinated campaigns of these grifting bigots and extremists utilize networked incitement and stochastic terror, a form of incitement to violence that harnesses incendiary rhetoric on social media against a particular group while refraining from explicit calls for violence, with the implicit understanding that violence is more likely to occur. Such efforts have been utilized with great effect to incite bomb threats, death threats, armed protests, arson, and vandalism against the LGBTQ community, its institutions, and allies. Social media companies have consistently failed to develop (or to enforce) adequate policies to combat this issue, allowing known bad actors to use their platforms to incite such actions even when clear links have been demonstrated, such as bomb threats being made against schools after Chaya Raichik, known as Libs of TikTok, posts about them supporting LGBTQ students.
These increasing expressions of hate and violence against the LGBTQ community are not occuring in a vacuum. A powerful new report by Over Zero on Decoding LGBTQ Scapegoating notes that the “rhetorical, political, and physical attacks targeting the LGBTQ community are, in addition to a critical rights issue, a central component of the authoritarian playbook, cloaking themselves as culture war politics as usual. LGBTQ scapegoating is not random.” The report concludes that these attacks are rooted in a deeper effort to “erode democracy” itself. As we see bedrock institutions such as schools and children’s hospitals being inundated with threats and violence, this tears at the very fabric of society.
Social media platforms have a responsibility to all of their users — and to society as a whole — to maintain the safety of their products. Time after time, social media companies are being shown to be complicit in the incitement of pogroms and sectarian violence across the world, as disinformation and unchecked hate have incited violence against minority communities — whether it’s the Rohingya in Myanmar, Muslims in Northern India, or insurrectionists storming the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021. These companies are failing miserably to meet the moment because increasing their shareholder value takes precedence over the health and safety of society.
As expressed in the open letter: “We speak together with one voice to demand that your companies create and enforce stronger content and ad policies to directly confront the content that is causing online and offline harm to transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming people." It’s time for social media companies to step up and meet their social and moral responsibility, it’s time for them to enforce their policies, and to take immediate meaningful action to prevent further harm.
Will Social Media Companies Ever Stop Platforming Extreme Anti-Trans Hate and Lies?
"EVERYTHING I DON'T LIKE IS CHAYA RAICHICK's FAULT"
Rising Online Hate, Rising Offline Violence
The persistent fear-mongering, hate, and scapegoating of LGBTQ people and the LGBTQ community is harmful and dangerous, and is inciting violence against the community. Just in the last few weeks, several prominent anti-LGBTQ social media accounts have praised and glorified burning and destroying Pride flags, which is inciting a nationwide escalation of vandalism and violence against Pride imagery in public. Last year, a shop owner who attempted to stop a Pride flag on her storefront from being defaced was murdered. The perpetrator was found to have an X (formerly Twitter) account that featured a pinned post of a burning Pride flag. What happens online does not stay there.
The coordinated campaigns of these grifting bigots and extremists utilize networked incitement and stochastic terror, a form of incitement to violence that harnesses incendiary rhetoric on social media against a particular group while refraining from explicit calls for violence, with the implicit understanding that violence is more likely to occur. Such efforts have been utilized with great effect to incite bomb threats, death threats, armed protests, arson, and vandalism against the LGBTQ community, its institutions, and allies. Social media companies have consistently failed to develop (or to enforce) adequate policies to combat this issue, allowing known bad actors to use their platforms to incite such actions even when clear links have been demonstrated, such as bomb threats being made against schools after Chaya Raichik, known as Libs of TikTok, posts about them supporting LGBTQ students.
These increasing expressions of hate and violence against the LGBTQ community are not occuring in a vacuum. A powerful new report by Over Zero on Decoding LGBTQ Scapegoating notes that the “rhetorical, political, and physical attacks targeting the LGBTQ community are, in addition to a critical rights issue, a central component of the authoritarian playbook, cloaking themselves as culture war politics as usual. LGBTQ scapegoating is not random.” The report concludes that these attacks are rooted in a deeper effort to “erode democracy” itself. As we see bedrock institutions such as schools and children’s hospitals being inundated with threats and violence, this tears at the very fabric of society.
Social media platforms have a responsibility to all of their users — and to society as a whole — to maintain the safety of their products. Time after time, social media companies are being shown to be complicit in the incitement of pogroms and sectarian violence across the world, as disinformation and unchecked hate have incited violence against minority communities — whether it’s the Rohingya in Myanmar, Muslims in Northern India, or insurrectionists storming the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021. These companies are failing miserably to meet the moment because increasing their shareholder value takes precedence over the health and safety of society.
As expressed in the open letter: “We speak together with one voice to demand that your companies create and enforce stronger content and ad policies to directly confront the content that is causing online and offline harm to transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming people." It’s time for social media companies to step up and meet their social and moral responsibility, it’s time for them to enforce their policies, and to take immediate meaningful action to prevent further harm.
Will Social Media Companies Ever Stop Platforming Extreme Anti-Trans Hate and Lies?
fresh pair of socks
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2023
Citation needed. There's also the fact that trans people are far more likely to be killed by another trans person or their pimp/drug dealer. These claims of violence are just as believable as the claims of teen suicide from kids denied dangerous hormones.
It's telling that the only evidence of violence offered by Alex is from a year ago, and against a heterosexual woman.
Stochastic terror, otherwise known as random acts of violence, cannot by definition be coordinated. Not to mention, grifters don't care about or even want violence; they want money. That's why they grift. If they are linked to violence, they risk being deplatformed.
Ordinary people, a.k.a the voice of democracy, are speaking out against allowing men in dresses access to young girls. They are also against debilitating, irreversible mutilation being performed on minors. Giving kids puberty blockers is what tears at the fabric of society.
What harm? There are threads on KF where Farmers have archived Twitter/Reddit posts of trans people discussing their lives in nauseating detail, complete with graphic images. Despite all their information being publicly available, none of these trans people have been victims of violence.
This is just another histrionic diatribe from Alex, full of blather and light on facts. I'm starting to think that Alex turned trans in order to be taken seriously; he might be one of the men who thought life as a "woman" is easy-mode. He never would have gotten a job at Harvard if it wasn't for the DEI initiative.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Do you think when Alex got his big important tech law job at HARVARD LAW SCHOOL he thought he'd be spending all his time LARPing as Tipper Gore? But about some woman on the internet he doesn't like.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
Harvard loves hiring illiterate people doesn't they?
Quoted for Truth! That's why Twitter etc must ban all LGBTQs because they are harmful to children.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2023
How tall is he?? I always perceived him as a bit of a manlet but is he a legit Hon??You don't have room to talk Lurch!
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
Alex weighs in on the first presidential debate.
SCOTUS did not say any of these things or anything even remotely close to this.
SCOTUS did not say any of these things or anything even remotely close to this.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2016
What was the DNC supposed to do here? For all Biden's faults (and there are many), being thrown under the bus and replaced by his own party would be an equally big gift to Donald Trump. Especially when the other big names in the party are all extremists (Ocasio-Cortez), old (Hillary), or both (Sanders).
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
Anyone who uses this term seriously is an immediate write off imo. It's like the only big word these idiots know lately too.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Good to see our improved mental health since stepping back from Twitter.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2023
Thanks Keffals you stupid troon.
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2023
If I can burn an American flag and it's protected by the 1st Amendment as "freedom of speech", burning/defacing/whatever to a Pride flag should also be "freedom of speech", Big Gay Al. The rest of us, believe it or not, are not....or at least, should not....be forced to treat your holy objects with the reverence you think they are due.
As far as the Court's decision in Chevron.....it's called "checks and balances", you legal wizard. They took the power from the Executive, and decided that the Legislature needs to pass some laws about that stuff instead of letting bureaucrats issue regulations and decide how to interpret them. They are allowed to do that as part of the Judicial branch.
Separation of powers, blah blah blah. My kids learned that in 5th grade, but Big Gay Al still doesn't unnerstand it.
He's part of the law school at Hah-vahrd*, people. Best of the best, ya know.
----------------------
* - ok, maybe he's more like the "study hall aide at Harvard" instead of a perfesser, but he's still drawing a paycheck from the hedge fund with an educational side hustle......
As far as the Court's decision in Chevron.....it's called "checks and balances", you legal wizard. They took the power from the Executive, and decided that the Legislature needs to pass some laws about that stuff instead of letting bureaucrats issue regulations and decide how to interpret them. They are allowed to do that as part of the Judicial branch.
Separation of powers, blah blah blah. My kids learned that in 5th grade, but Big Gay Al still doesn't unnerstand it.
He's part of the law school at Hah-vahrd*, people. Best of the best, ya know.
----------------------
* - ok, maybe he's more like the "study hall aide at Harvard" instead of a perfesser, but he's still drawing a paycheck from the hedge fund with an educational side hustle......
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
No, he understands it (allegedly), it's just only supposed to be used when he wants. Like if the court protected professors or students from consequences for Hamas support.
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2020
If you can't read the contract, they have the upper hand while stiffing you or firing you.
Boy does he love calling for violence. My suggestion is that he do it himself if he hates them so much, he can't be this lazy. Of course, he won't (and I much rather not have him do so), because it would be too hard and too detrimental to himself.
Most narc troons would love nothing more than to live in a dictatorship ruled by the troon party. It would be absolute disaster for them since they would turn on each other quick, but they just want their enemies dealt with NOW NOW NOW NOW in the manner THEY think is right.
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022