Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, Biden cancelling the pipeline project on his first day was the first crack. They have just been building and building, and the debate was the final straw where there is no point hiding that he is not doing well to the voter base.Afghanistan was the first crack
I don't disagree that backing out of the debate would've done less damage than actually showing up. But when we say this, we have the benefit of 20/20 Hindsight. I don't think they expected it to be as bad as it was (I had pretty low expectations and I didn't predict this to be as bad as it was)Certainly, but when Trump called their bluff they should’ve folded. Make whatever pathetic excuse they could to shut it down. Literally anything would’ve been better than what actually happened.
I'm really interested to see what the polls are after this debate.
I tend to believe this is accurate but where it's going to get interesting is when the funding starts to get cut. I can't imagine that the big donors are going to keep shoveling money at this shit show and right now the narrative isn't about whether or not Trump is a Menace to Society While Drinking Juice in the Hood (which is what they were running on). The narrative is whether or not Joe should stay in. I think the 2008 Obama Campaign was the first campaign to crack a billion dollars, I don't know what one costs now but I can only imagine it's a lot more. They're going to run dry on funding (which is going to make it harder for them to counter the narrative that Joe is a pants shitting retard).More great news. Thanks chomo joe for making this election cycle very easy for us
View attachment 6142623
I don't even like Trump, I just think it's funny that after the Democrats smugness over winning the white house in 2020 that it is Trump who will have the last laugh.No, people just wanted Trump gone. But now that it's been 4 years and it's abundantly clear that Biden's worse, there's no way he's winning clean this time.
Do you have some details on that? I can't find anything via internet search (and I'd think the left run tech media would love any chance they can get to shit on Reagan). I've never heard this before. Not doubting you, just looking for info since I can't find any via the internet....Or did they completely remove the President from the football like they did in 1988?
They can't. Legally that money belongs to the Biden campaign. If he drops out they have to give at all back. Even if Harris replaces him because legally that's still a separate campaignThe good news out of all of this is that (I believe) there is a limited amount of time where they could transfer Biden's war chest to another candidate.
He doesn't have the national name recognition that would be necessary this close to the election. Remember, the Dems prime target group are the chronically uninformed. They can't possibly win without that cohort. That's why their only options, impo, are Harris, Clinton or Obama. They have the profile necessary to get the dummies to say "I recognize that name!" and put their mark by it.If, in the unlikely instance, of biden dropping out and the party nominating a replacement beshear would be their best bet. He is a well spoken white man from a southern state. he's governed decently well (because every other state office is GOP, and he claims credit) and is a national unknown.
if he doesn't get the nod this time he will in 2028. he is clearly setting the ground work for then. if he's smart he stays out now and doesn't risk his career. but he could win.
They can't, and they know it. All this is just chest thumping.I hope they don't replace Biden
It's a non-starter. People hate Kamala more than they despise him.
I feel like you're giving them too much trust. When have these faggots ever played by the rules? They used CIA fuckfuck games to depose Nixon. They tricked that retard Reagan into giving out amnesty then never held up their end of the bargain. They killed JFK. They straight up stole an election in 2020. Frankly even assuming these bastards will just steal an election is giving too much credit. These fuckers could say the sky is blue and you still shouldn't trust them even if you see the sky is indeed blue.They can't, and they know it. All this is just chest thumping.
All the delegates are legally bound to vote for Biden. All the top DNC people (so, the Super Delegates) are Biden people. Basically, nothing is going to happen if Biden himself refuses to drop out, which is what's happening. If Biden drops dead that might be a different story but they're not getting a new candidate any other way
There's a time to take the high road and Trump saw it in the debate there. Why make fun of a senile man when letting him speak torpedoes the campaign?Biden underperformed dramatically, but they didn't expect Trump to overperform (which he did.
My money is still on Stacey Abrams for the sacrificial lamb.Their going to come into this with limited funding and little time to get their name out there. If they do sub him out, it's going to be for a no-name candidate. Somebody way back in the line who sees this as a chance to jump forward or someone who's been relegated to obscurity and sees this as a Hail Mary attempt to get back into public life (Beto maybe?).
Kamala is a non-starter because of Jill too.It's a non-starter. People hate Kamala more than they despise him.
Abrams does have the name recognition, but she has even less qualifications than PP Buttigieg. I think that her highest elected office as a professional politician of 20+ years was as a state senator.. Still, the main qualification of a presidential candidate is, "do people know your name?"My money is still on Stacey Abrams for the sacrificial lamb.
Seriously, she doesn't have to pander to black people. She's a Democrat. She could call them dumb niggers and most of them will still vote for her because she has a D in front of her name. Just as long as she's not gay.Hahahaha the blacks aren't buying it from Kamala Harris at the BET awards
View attachment 6142875
View attachment 6142876
View attachment 6142882
View attachment 6142880
View attachment 6142883
I say Abrams because of three things. She's hungry for power, she's stupid enough to take the offer, and her losing would shut up some very vocal parts of the party.Abrams does have the name recognition, but she has even less qualifications than PP Buttigieg. I think that her highest elected office as a professional politician of 20+ years was as a state senator.. Still, the main qualification of a presidential candidate is, "do people know your name?"
You're not going to get an A-Lister signing on. You're going to find someone who's either a no-name or who's had their shot and lost it going in. Abrams might try for it.Abrams does have the name recognition, but she has even less qualifications than PP Buttigieg. I think that her highest elected office as a professional politician of 20+ years was as a state senator.. Still, the main qualification of a presidential candidate is, "do people know your name?"
And I'm asking, I thought there was a way campaigns could contribute to other campaigns (or into a PAC). If a candidate decides to not run again, that money can't be used for their personal use and doesn't just sit frozen forever. I'm almost certain that there's a way to move it around (and how you are allowed to move it is time sensitive).They can't. Legally that money belongs to the Biden campaign. If he drops out they have to give at all back. Even if Harris replaces him because legally that's still a separate campaign
She may also allow them to claim Georgia is now in play... It's not a bad move at all, and could help them save face in some regards.You're not going to get an A-Lister signing on. You're going to find someone who's either a no-name or who's had their shot and lost it going in. Abrams might try for it.