State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
They could make one now and then in the OP simply have in the largest text "THE BODYCAM FOOTAGE HAS NOT RELEASED." Then, once it drops, change it to "HERE'S THE BODYCAM FOOTAGE." If people want to know if it's released, go to the bodycam footage thread OP, and hit F5.

Somehow, people will still stupidly ask whether it's dropped yet.
Honestly that’s a good idea.

@Null could you actually pin a thread to the top of the Balldoverse subsection and lock it until the release? We’ll likely have people still asking here, but it’ll be a good thing to have.
 
They could make one now and then in the OP simply have in the largest text "THE BODYCAM FOOTAGE HAS NOT RELEASED." Then, once it drops, change it to "HERE'S THE BODYCAM FOOTAGE." If people want to know if it's released, go to the bodycam footage thread OP, and hit F5.

Somehow, people will still stupidly ask whether it's dropped yet.
Bodycam canary
 
Cross-posting this excellent post from @Lubby Smith that shows how Nick's judge weighs reports from Scandanavian prudes concerned citizens who report drug use. Somewhat ironically for Nick's purported legal approach, he represented the defendant in this case where it was said:

1719694155361.png


ETA: Thumnailed image
 
Somewhat ironically for Nick's purported legal approach, he represented the defendant in this case where it was said:
More ironically, he actually won the case, or at least got a good outcome where but for a screwed up lab test, they had the defendant dead to rights.
 
Quit shitting up the thread with this fucking retardation. The GUY WHO RUNS THE SITE is the one in charge of getting that shit.

DO YOU REALIZE, DO YOU REALIZE, that the INSTANT he gets it it will be instantly featured all over the site?

QUIT BEING A FUCKING RETARD!
You never know.

Null might be in possession of it and wanting to pop off a few Justice Chats of his own on his computer screen before letting anyone else get to it. This has to be some serious catharsis for Null.

But onto a more serious point:

Do you think that they're questioning the children while they're in care and/or do you think what they may say might result in additional charges?

I don't know if a minor's word can be taken in court.
 
Do you think that they're questioning the children while they're in care and/or do you think what they may say might result in additional charges?

I don't know if a minor's word can be taken in court.
Definitely, and their word can be taken in court. The issue is you have to be very careful about questioning kids, because it's much easier to influence their answers by just by asking specific questions.

You need to be very open with them, ask open ended questions without a clear goal/answer in mind, and hope they respond with something usable.
 
You need to be very open with them, ask open ended questions without a clear goal/answer in mind, and hope they respond with something usable.
Some pretty hard lessons were learned by the courts during the "satanic panic". You had 9 year Olds get on the stand and say with absolutely conviction their daycare supervisors were holding bloody rituals to Lucifer in between nap time. All because of leading questions.
 
Some pretty hard lessons were learned by the courts during the "satanic panic". You had 9 year Olds get on the stand and say with absolutely conviction their daycare supervisors were holding bloody rituals to Lucifer in between nap time. All because of leading questions.
It always astounds me how society has memory holed the satanic panic when it should be taught to everyone to show how dumb our species can be.

I remember chatting to some old Scottish bloke in a pub who said during the Orkney scandal, were social services went full retard and yes-anded a bunch of kids into a bunch of weird claims, he slept in the living room with his shotgun loaded in case social services turned up at his farm.

It’s hardly ever mentioned now.
 
Some pretty hard lessons were learned by the courts during the "satanic panic". You had 9 year Olds get on the stand and say with absolutely conviction their daycare supervisors were holding bloody rituals to Lucifer in between nap time. All because of leading questions.
The well connected parents that invented a whole society and science of implanted memory that was never proven or allowed to be attempted to be falsified by outside people, the people accused of doin horrible things to their kids.

You know, maybe this was their hail mary to avoid jail time.

Like I'm sure believers can easily be riled up into a panic about satanic stuff, when things like reversed rock songs can cause it too. But I don't think it is unlikely that there was stuff covered up at the time, which in pre internet time was even easier to fan the flames of speculation.

Look at things like the dutroux thing in belgium, supposedly a lone wolf, yet acquiring young girls and holding them in large properties despite supposedly not being rich. Hundreds of thousands of people on the streets in protest to get real justice and real investigation, but every part of it you look into and there'a obviously more under the surface that's being wilfully ignored.

Child testimony is a very precarious thing, as adult testimony is too, I suppose. But that's why the cocaine test means ao much more.
 
Last edited:
You never know.

Null might be in possession of it and wanting to pop off a few Justice Chats of his own on his computer screen before letting anyone else get to it. This has to be some serious catharsis for Null.
You have an account on a gossip forum where all sorts of spicy receipts have been released the *moment* they appeared, and that account is 9 years old.... And you think the owner of that kind of site is going to fucking keep a receipt he raised thousands of dollars to get in his pocket for..... catharsis?

Please tell me I'm having a 'tism moment and this was sarcasm. If it is, I'll own the L.
 
The well connected parents that invented a whole society and science of implanted memory that was never proven or allowed to be attempted to be falsified by outside people, the people accused of doin horrible things to their kids.

You know, maybe this was their hail mary to avoid jail time.

Like I'm sure believers can easily be riled up into a panic about satanic stuff, when things like reversed rock songs can cause it too. But I don't think it is unlikely that there was stuff covered up at the time, which in pre internet time was even easier to fan the flames of speculation.

Look at things like the dutroux thing in belgium, supposedly a lone wolf, yet acquiring young girls and holding them in large properties despite supposedly not being rich. Hundreds of thousands of people on the streets in protest to get real justice and real investigation, but every part of it you look into and there'a obviously more under the surface that's being wilfully ignored.
False memories is a very real thing though, it’s horrifically easy to do.

It happens in therapy with adults too. I often wonder how many Me Too cases were because some daft bint told a therapist “I had a few drinks and had sex with him tee hee” and the therapist went “so let’s talk at length about how you were raped just then.”

Dutroux is something I want to read up on, but I speak only a tiny bit of French and most English language stuff I’ve seen tends to by people who make David Icke look sane. If you’ve got some recommendations I’d really appreciate it if you could post them (sorry if this seems like thread derailing, ignore me if it is.)
 
False memories is a very real thing though, it’s horrifically easy to do.

It happens in therapy with adults too. I often wonder how many Me Too cases were because some daft bint told a therapist “I had a few drinks and had sex with him tee hee” and the therapist went “so let’s talk at length about how you were raped just then.”

Dutroux is something I want to read up on, but I speak only a tiny bit of French and most English language stuff I’ve seen tends to by people who make David Icke look sane. If you’ve got some recommendations I’d really appreciate it if you could post them (sorry if this seems like thread derailing, ignore me if it is.)
I don't have an easy entry on this. I waded through a lot of crazy material to sift like a goldrush panner to find the occasional little nugget to sustain the entire endeavor of which 99% was fruitless. It also was years ago and some of the useful sites are gone now.

The best way to approach currently is probably to do searches on archive.is or waybackmachine on "dutroux".
 
I don't have an easy entry on this. I waded through a lot of crazy material to sift like a goldrush panner to find the occasional little nugget to sustain the entire endeavor of which 99% was fruitless. It also was years ago and some of the useful sites are gone now.

The best way to approach currently is probably to do searches on archive.is or waybackmachine on "dutroux".
Appreciated, kiwi bro. It’s weird how hard it is to find information in English on this.

The Wikipedia article is weirdly terrible. Call me a cynic but I'm starting to think these blood drinking, moloch worshiping pedophiles who run the Internet might not have our best interests in mind.
 
Some pretty hard lessons were learned by the courts during the "satanic panic". You had 9 year Olds get on the stand and say with absolutely conviction their daycare supervisors were holding bloody rituals to Lucifer in between nap time. All because of leading questions.
McMartin Preschool was actually real. FBI scheduled case file declassifications proved it.
Edit: @Corn Syrup Connoisseur beat me to the punch by three minutes. Damn.
 
Last edited:
Do you think that they're questioning the children while they're in care and/or do you think what they may say might result in additional charges?

I don't know if a minor's word can be taken in court.
Almost certainly as to the first and maybe as to the second.

And minors can definitely testify. Otherwise it would be nearly impossible to prosecute many abuse cases.
 
Back