Culture San Francisco Pride Parade features public nudity around kids, 'Fetish Zone' with urine - FBI, ATF participate in parade

Article / Archive

The recent San Francisco Pride Parade featured nude adults walking around in front of children and a "Fetish Zone" where men urinated on each other in a kiddie pool and performed other sex acts.

Multiple reporters on the ground over the weekend posted graphic footage on X of the annual event that receives millions in donations from corporations and civic organizations in San Francisco. The ATF and FBI also participated in the parade, according to footage obtained by TENET Media.

TENET Media field reporter Taylor Hansen interviewed multiple nude men on the street who attempted to justify their public nudity in front of children as natural and sometimes even good for them.

"None of the crybabies and parents who complain about it can ever explain exactly how a child is harmed by seeing the human body, and every study that's been done on the subject shows that it's not harmful. Children who grow up with it are more well-adjusted," said one naked man who described himself as "a nudist and an artist."

"I think that kids are born naked and that as long as there’s not any kind of sexuality added to it, that it’s just nude. That’s all it is," another man said, who removed his towel to expose himself mid-way through the interview.

A 9-year-old girl Hansen spoke to recounted how she saw a man wearing a Darth Vader helmet and cape "with nothing else," which she said made her feel "grossed out."

Two naked men who described themselves as "non-binary" and "pan[sexual]" also made light of the nudity.

"Just in general, sex work is OK, so is being nude in public. San Francisco's kind of all about that," the man who identified as non-binary said.

"I know there's kids," the pansexual man said. "I don't really like that. I also want them to experience this event too, so I just try to be really respectful about it, and when I see kids, I go walk the other way. It's tough, it really is." He floated the idea of having an adults-only part of the event.

Hansen also posted a thread on X detailing more footage he captured of naked adults in front of children at the parade, including one man who positioned himself at the front of the crowd as multiple school districts and the Boy Scouts of America marched by in the parade.

The Christian Post has reached out to the San Francisco Pride Parade for comment and will update this piece if they respond.

Hansen also asked officers with the San Francisco Police Department about the nudity in front of children, which one officer affirmed was legal as long as no "sexual gratification" took place.

According to a San Francisco ordinance, public nudity is prohibited except during "any permitted parade, fair, or festival held under a City or other government issued permit."

Footage taken by reporter Savanah Hernandez at the event's Fetish Zone showed a bearded man in an inflatable kiddie pool being urinated on by a woman as others around them watched. Hernandez reported that despite the area being 18+, the attendant was not checking IDs.

Footage of the same pool taken by Hansen showed a similar situation, but which also included fellatio. When Hansen approached police about the incident, they reportedly told him it's a "pick your own battles kind of day."

Other booths in the Fetish Zone reportedly featured men getting whipped and spanked, as well as other simulated sex acts.

Most mainstream media outlets that covered the event neglected to cover its lewder aspects, with the San Francisco Chronicle running with the headline: "SF Pride Parade draws thousands celebrating LGBTQ community: 'We love our people'"

"Pride takes over San Francisco streets with eye-catching costumes and fantastic floats," read the headline from SFGate.
 
You tell me, pornhub is full of that shit - in straight mode.

Marquis de Sade did it first.
Not all gays do anal, even. And most straights who do it don't do anything more degen besides that. Hard truth. BDSM shit is just it's own dimension of degen.
The Marquis was one fucked up loser. "Leather culture" is a whole scene and ask any gay historian, a crucial cornerstone of what makes "gay culture" gay culture.

At the end of the day, a straight couple can repent, turn their lives around, and build a family together. They can have a warm and loving full romantic and sexual relationship for the rest of their lives while never again engaging in any kind of weird shit whatsoever.

Gay people can't do that while still doing gay shit. You can't make a family with another man's asshole or by playing house with an asexual librarian "wife." You can steal other people's kids and commit acts that were seen as absolutely foul by everyone until gays and "I want to destroy Christendom" Al Goldstein pornographer types forced it into the mainstream about 30 years ago.

What Bill and Monica did in the Oval Office was, at the time, still seen as kind of freaky behavior. It was still illegal in most of the South and the Midwest. (Lawrence V Texas was 2003.) I pity the kids who were born after that date. They have never known a time when "heterosexual anal" (et al) wasn't forced down everyone's throats by anti-human communist freaks.
 
Gay people can't do that while still doing gay shit. You can't make a family with another man's asshole or by playing house with an asexual librarian "wife." You can steal other people's kids and commit acts that were seen as absolutely foul by everyone until gays and "I want to destroy Christendom" Al Goldstein pornographer types forced it into the mainstream about 30 years ago.
I can actually agree with that sentiment to some degree. I'm not "fully" gay, for example, and do find some women attractive and there are some guys who fool around when they're younger and then suddenly quit, go for women and never talk about having been gay ever again. I'm a bit late on that train so far and still consider myself mostly gay - not trying to give you some everybody's Bi bullshit here because i know most men aren't build like that at all, so I know I'm different. But I can vaguely see myself getting with a woman - if it happens, it happens - I also condemn surrogacy.
I vaguely 'member how some high profile gays of yesteryear also condemned that publicly and catched flak for that. But they were in the minority, of course. I'm also beginning to severly doubt the it's not a phase talk but I wouldn't exactly tout my horn about all that in front of pride flag waving fags.
 
Last edited:
I for one am pretty shocked and disappointed.

When I bring my kids to a sex party, I expect there to be ID checks before the urination pool.

This will give a bad image to adults who enjoy pissing on each others in public. Sad how innocent activities can end up being vilified for sheer incompetence.

I hope these men are safe and do not suffer death threats on the Twitter (now X, and worse than ever in addressing harassement, as we all know).
 
So they file a report to the city or station directly. These orgs are lawyered up. I believe in them. They can do it.

You can't privately do this. You can make an official complaint all day long but it's 100% their discretion whether to do anything about it. If they don't, there's literally nothing you can do.
 
Hard disagree, "naturist resorts" are extremely full of pervs and often have photography and video made available to perverts to purchase. Some even have child naked beauty contests and sell the footage.

Nudism has huge pedo problems. Obviously.

I almost started to sperg about this but caught myself in time before posting a novel.

"Often" is very much of a stretch unless you're thinking about some weird Eastern European place or maybe 20+years ago.

Most naturist places are not "resorts", it's just a camping site, there is no organization beyond renting the land. Most don't even stay in naturist places, just go to places near the best beaches.

Many places now also segregate families from adults without kids, because there are indeed predators lurking. Obviously.

Gays also have their own destinations and beaches or side of the beach. Which is always the most degenerate, they just want to get a full tan and show off or fuck, they are not naturists.
 
I don't understand why fags are compelled to turn every gathering involving them into some hedonistic cross between the Jim Rose Circus and an orgy. More to the immediate point, I don't understand why they refuse to stand up and demand children not be exposed to their depravity. It's one thing for consenting adults to want to see and be seen during the prurient proceedings, but children are not consenting adults.

Unless they want children to see. But some would call that grooming, something the Alphabet Brigade have assured us is not at all their objective.
 
I almost started to sperg about this but caught myself in time before posting a novel.

"Often" is very much of a stretch unless you're thinking about some weird Eastern European place or maybe 20+years ago.

Most naturist places are not "resorts", it's just a camping site, there is no organization beyond renting the land. Most don't even stay in naturist places, just go to places near the best beaches.

Many places now also segregate families from adults without kids, because there are indeed predators lurking. Obviously.

Gays also have their own destinations and beaches or side of the beach. Which is always the most degenerate, they just want to get a full tan and show off or fuck, they are not naturists.
Nudists are degenerates that should be tossed in the same pit as pedophiles and monkeypox enjoyers.
 
Explain to me in plain English why it is critically important to expose your genitals in the presence of young children.
How and where did I ever defend this?

I was merely pointing out that saying nudist places "often" do, foster or benefit from such practices in the modern world is lunacy.

This shit is absolutely disgusting but it has literally nothing in common with naturism. Most naturists grew up in it and there is less and less. They just want to be left in peace.

They do legitimate effort to protect themselves against this type of allegation. Even suspicious behavior, like taking pictures (of anyone) is ground for expulsion.

These fuckers celebrating degeneracy and pissing on each other in front of kids has nothing to do with naturism.

And I am not going to deny it obviously attracts degenerates. But to pretend that this common and accepted thing is just wrong.
 
How and where did I ever defend this?

I was merely pointing out that saying nudist places "often" do, foster or benefit from such practices in the modern world is lunacy.

This shit is absolutely disgusting but it has literally nothing in common with naturism. Most naturists grew up in it and there is less and less. They just want to be left in peace.

They do legitimate effort to protect themselves against this type of allegation. Even suspicious behavior, like taking pictures (of anyone) is ground for expulsion.

These fuckers celebrating degeneracy and pissing on each other in front of kids has nothing to do with naturism.

And I am not going to deny it obviously attracts degenerates. But to pretend that this common and accepted thing is just wrong.
Why do you need to be naked in the presence of children? Presumably you get something out of it yes? Otherwise nudists wouldn't engage in this behavior at all.

I'll ask again, what is the innocent non perverse explanation for why grown adults need to hang out naked with kids?
 
On the other hand, if you were a cop would you really want to arrest the guy shooting up his dick? That's deeper than rock bottom, that's drilling into the mantle.

He'll probably fight to the death like a corned pitbull and is loaded with diseases.
If I was a cop I might taze him in his doodle just for the lulz
 
Why do you need to be naked in the presence of children? Presumably you get something out of it yes? Otherwise nudists wouldn't engage in this behavior at all.

I'll ask again, what is the innocent non perverse explanation for why grown adults need to hang out naked with kids?
Again, you're twisting my words and conveniently ignore that I mentioned it's mostly segregated. I am not even arguing for the practice, just pointing out that what was said was wrong.

You're making me some type of advocate for the enemy you have in mind, which I am not.

I only go to beaches, and never see kids. Most of the time I don't actually see anyone at all. And I like it better that way. Which makes sense since it's usually not easily accessible.

Naturism is not about sex. It's just freeing, And if you grew up into it, I think it's difficult to explain. I just like it better, so if I can, I do. Nothing much else to it. I imagine many are the same.

I see this debate is going to turn to shit and I should have probably refrained from engaging into it to begin with. I hope I have made it clear I am not some sort of nonce and be done with it.
 
Back