Plagued Ruben Sim Derangement Syndrome - Because it's definitely a good look to attack a guy who takes down pedophiles.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1.png
 
can't believe ruben sim fans would do this
View attachment 6149076
GRh4VR6XQAEIa8Q.jpgGRh4UNdWkAA675a.jpg
"Kiwifarms.net" is not under the poster, which means he's viewing the post from his account; he has an account here.
Edit: he might not, since the report/like/quote/reply buttons aren't at the bottom of the other post. hm...
 
Last edited:
Apple gimped Airdrop's automatic send/receive functionality worldwide at the behest of the CCP during the Hong Kong protests and covered it up by saying they were thinking about the children/women.
Did they actually use "think of the children" as an excuse? I remember when it was most popular people were airdropping memes to each other.
The replies are even more deranged than you'd expect
The original artist is replying to everyone being negative to ruben lmao
1719977094793.png

If the artist is reading this, I just want to say that while I don't support AI art completely, you're fucking dumb for saying he "stole" your art. If he passed it off as his own work, and also sold the art, I'd get it. However that isn't the case? You just seem to be afraid that you're gonna be replaced. I'm gonna be real, I think the only thing being replaced with AI is storyboarding, because that's meant to be a rough guess. Every day that Ratlobber tweet gets more and more funnier
1719977401825.png

1719977664532.png
Well, it's fine to make fun of a guy getting hit by a car if he uses le bad AI. The video in question he sent was this:
1719977955470.png
He hated Ruben before this due to the Fishinq video. Makes sense. He just needed to try to find an actual reason to dislike him, and still failed. Plus Fishinq is doing the exact same by digging up one thing about an old guy's past.
This guy makes gore for a children's game. what the fuck?
Roblox does not give a shit about gore. As long as you don't swear or have sex, you can have the goriest things known to man and be rated 13+. Still find it funny how Runker got banned for extreme gore yet games based off of fucking Manhunt are on this site.
I'm hosting an AI generated fan art competition on Twitter. Post your best generations in the replies here.
I suck ass at figuring out good prompts, so i'll skip out on this one. I also think you could open it up to actual artists too, hell you could encourage some artists to remake the AI art.
 
I am somewhat of an artist myself. I even drew over the "Hanz are we ze baddies" image and made it into my pfp on kiwi farms with MS paint. This whole "AI IS LE BAD... BECAUSE IT IS LITERALLY STEALING ART!!!1111!!!11!!!" is just complete, unadulterated, cope. No, nothing was stolen. Stolen implies scarcity, which does not exist for most things on the internet (not accounting for NFTs which have arguably been around since the hat market opened in tf2.). The image was "copied", with you STILL having it on your hard drive or cloud, put into a data model to train on multiple other people's work, then the said model put out for millions of people to use for FREE. Potentially freeing up an unquantifiable amount of time & money for millions of people on the internet. Do you genuinely want legislation for this? Do you want people to be criminally prosecuted because they "stole" something which wasn't even a scarce recourse in the first place? If you don't like AI, fine, whatever. You can consume human-made art on twitter in peace. But to be this vitriolic? Genuinely, can't you put that passion into your art or whatever other craftsmanship you pursue?
 
I am somewhat of an artist myself. I even drew over the "Hanz are we ze baddies" image and made it into my pfp on kiwi farms with MS paint. This whole "AI IS LE BAD... BECAUSE IT IS LITERALLY STEALING ART!!!1111!!!11!!!" is just complete, unadulterated, cope. No, nothing was stolen. Stolen implies scarcity, which does not exist for most things on the internet (not accounting for NFTs which have arguably been around since the hat market opened in tf2.). The image was "copied", with you STILL having it on your hard drive or cloud, put into a data model to train on multiple other people's work, then the said model put out for millions of people to use for FREE. Potentially freeing up an unquantifiable amount of time & money for millions of people on the internet. Do you genuinely want legislation for this? Do you want people to be criminally prosecuted because they "stole" something which wasn't even a scarce recourse in the first place? If you don't like AI, fine, whatever. You can consume human-made art on twitter in peace. But to be this vitriolic? Genuinely, can't you put that passion into your art or whatever other craftsmanship you pursue?
People will complain that AI is le bad then proceed to burst their sides laughing at that one Dr. Mario AI video where he throws Luigi out of the window because he wouldn't take a Fentanyl suppository (among other people for different reasons)
 
Back