Crime Neil Gaiman Accused of Sexual Assault, Author Denies Allegations

Acclaimed author Neil Gaiman is facing multiple allegations of sexual assault, making him the subject of a police complaint in New Zealand. Gaiman has offered a response as well, refuting the accusations.

Per Tortoise Media, two women have accused Gaiman of sexual assault while in consensual relationships with the author. The allegations go back two decades, but they were first reported on in Tortoise's podcast Master: the allegations against Neil Gaiman, which was released on Wednesday. The women describe allegations of "rough and degrading sex," alleging that these instances were not always consensual.

One of the two accusers, a 23-year-old woman named Scarlett, claims she was sexually assaulted in February 2022 just hours after first meeting Gaiman. According to Scarlett, the assault happened in a bath at Gaiman's New Zealand home where she was hired to work as a nanny for his child. Gaiman says that the two merely "cuddled" and "made out" that day, adding that a three-week sexual relationship ensued, but was entirely consensual. Scarlett insists that Gaiman was "rough and degrading," and reportedly, messages, notes, and accounts from friends support her allegations.

Another accuser, identifying herself as K, says she was an 18-year-old fan when she first met Gaiman at a book signing in Sarasota, Florida, in 2003. K claims that she began a romantic relationship with Gaiman after she turned 20, resulting in engaging in rough sex that she "neither wanted nor enjoyed." It's alleged that one particular incident saw Gaimain forcefully penetrating K despite her objections.

Gaiman has denied this claim as well. The Sandman author maintains that his relationship with K was never unlawful and that he's "disturbed" to be accused of such behavior. According to Gaiman, K's allegations stem from "regret" over the relationship she had when it was over. He also attributed Scarlett's allegations to a condition she has that's associated with false memories, but the Tortoise report noted that this isn't supported by the accuser's medical records.

Additionally, Gaiman has strongly denied all allegations of non-consensual sex at any time with the women accusing him of sexual assault. He also claimed that New Zealand police ignored his offer for assistance with one woman's complaint in 2022, suggesting that shows a lack of substance in the investigation. New Zealand officers have responded by saying they made a "number of attempts to speak to key people as part of this investigation and those efforts remain ongoing." It was added that there are "a number of factors to take into consideration with this case, including location of all parties.”

Gaiman has long been one of pop culture's most revered authors, bringing to life acclaimed stories like The Sandman, Good Omens, and American Gods. Just recently, Netflix has been promoting the upcoming second season of The Sandman, which is based on Gaiman's source material; he also executive produces the series.

Source/Archive

________________________________________________________________________

Honestly while Gaiman was not on the top of my "insufferable and terminally overhyped geek culture retards I cant wait to get outed as sex predators for my own amusement" list (currently being topped by Wil Wheaton followed by Alan Moore) I cannot deny feeling that little bit jollier with the thought I may never have to hear him mentioned again
 
I would normally be highly inclined towards accusations this flimsy being total bunk, even if the guy is your standard male feminist creep archetype who all-too-often prey upon women, but... The fuck is that about falsely accusing a supposed victim of having a condition causing false memories? What a way to make yourself look immediately highly suspicious.
 
I would normally be highly inclined towards accusations this flimsy being total bunk, even if the guy is your standard male feminist creep archetype who all-too-often prey upon women, but... The fuck is that about falsely accusing a supposed victim of having a condition causing false memories? What a way to make yourself look immediately highly suspicious.
That's some genuine Gaslight shit
 
I would normally be highly inclined towards accusations this flimsy being total bunk, even if the guy is your standard male feminist creep archetype who all-too-often prey upon women, but... The fuck is that about falsely accusing a supposed victim of having a condition causing false memories? What a way to make yourself look immediately highly suspicious.
"No, stalker woman, you just allucinated about having sex with me. Enjoy a needlessly dragged out court process, whore"
 
I would normally be highly inclined towards accusations this flimsy being total bunk, even if the guy is your standard male feminist creep archetype who all-too-often prey upon women, but... The fuck is that about falsely accusing a supposed victim of having a condition causing false memories? What a way to make yourself look immediately highly suspicious.
MFW the guy accused of rape by some random skanks also happens to be an insufferable retard on social media

 
He based Death's appearance off an early goth fashion model named Cinnamon Hadley, she was a lesbian. He orbited her to high hell and back before she died, obviously inserted her as a means to cope with the fact he couldn't fuck her. Marrying the Dresden Dolls singer too is just lol.

So he's always been close to alternative culture stuff which has plenty of overlap with weird sex stuff and general weird behaviour.

He's still a Jewish progressive cultist regardless. The odds don't look great given those traits lmao. But hey who knows, false accusations aren't underheard of.
 
Why is this assmunch even trying to deny it?

He was retweeting and liking radfems who said that even if falsely accused the man should bear the punishment as atonement for men's collective guilt over abuse. He cited that "good men don't receive ill accusations".

Well faggot, time to kill yourself and cleanse men of their sins.
 
I would normally be highly inclined towards accusations this flimsy being total bunk, even if the guy is your standard male feminist creep archetype who all-too-often prey upon women, but... The fuck is that about falsely accusing a supposed victim of having a condition causing false memories? What a way to make yourself look immediately highly suspicious.

That's some genuine Gaslight shit
we'd need to see court transcripts to know what this is even about
did he just make it up at random?
did he repeat something that she once told him but exaggerated it for his benefit?
did he repeat something that she once told him but wasn't real?
was it real and she just lied on her podcast?
no way to know from the little information we have available at the moment
 
Last edited:
sounds like used-up groupie first world hedonism problems. remember, these women would be in their late thirties rn. meanwhile, you can make these claims about almost any male celebrity from the second half of the 20th century, it's just hard to parade grannies as sex victims.

say what you will about his politics, i hope, like manson and lindemann he takes these women to court for being a lying whore.


also fuck amanda palmer. figuratively speaking. she and bitches like cortney love are where silly girls get the idea that being a lying whore is empowering.
 
Much as I like his work (at least to a certain point, I haven't read anything after Graveyard Book, except for Norse Mythology, which is not really his work, just his presentation of, obviously, the myths), I'm not surprised and I'm not upset about it.
It seems completely plausible that he did, and equally plausible that he surrounded himself with the kind of people who would accuse him of sexpesting, either falsely or by misunderstanding.

I'll repeat my anecdote with Gaiman that I've posted before around here: when I was studying translation, my final assignment was to find a work that had not been translated to our language, obtain permission from the authors or rights holders to translate it, and then translate it.
I picked a story from a Gaiman book that hadn't been translated at that time, contacted his assistant, and to my surprise she replied. I explained it was just for college work and it wouldn't be published or distributed or used commercially in any way; she asked Neil, and he gave me his blessing.
Then the assignment changed, I didn't get to translate the story, instead got sent to translate a manual for a fucking hospital (surely someone got paid for it but it wasn't me).

In any case, Neil was nice enough to me, he could have easily refused or ignored it entirely, and that gave me a feeling that he's at least partially a good person.
But he's also a tremendously annoying proggy, and that mean he's at least partially a bad person.
 
I have never been able to figure out how someone who wrote a book as good as American Gods could be such a nigger faggot IRL.
Neil Gaiman is kind of a special case when talking about writers being influenced by the most terminally online of his own audience; most authors that drank the Kool-aid didn't really have much of an online presence before Twitter's boom around 2012 or so; by the year 1999 Neil already had unhealthy Internet habits and was regularly posting in Compuserve forums, user groups and other web 1.0 shady corners that were dark magic to most other writers, shitposting to his heart's content and even getting into retarded Internet slapfights before it was cool to do so. Neil is a prolific author, but I can assure you his Internet footprint absolutely dwarfs his printed works. He was an early-ish adopter of twitter (almost 190k posts to this day) and had an equally unhealthy relationship with Tumblr of all things. He wasn't a dick (at least at first), and in fact he always tried to interact positively with his fans; I've personally talked with him a couple of times and I have nothing bad to say about my interactions with him (his fanbase is another story altogether).
I don't want to defend Neil because he's in a hell of his own making, but a quarter of a century of exposure to online retardation, extremely dangerous amounts of weapons-grade asspats, cluster love-bombing and an unending supply of young and fresh adoring dicksuckers can melt the most resilient brain into over-socialized goo. He was always very transparently left-leaning, but you can tell in his early works that he was critical of the cult-like traps he eventually fell for (probably related with his personal and familiar relationship with Scientology, but that's me speculating), and wasn't shy of poking his own side here and there.
He should have gone offline a decade ago, but he's an addict, to the point where I can't think of a more terminally online celebrity, or one that has been gazing into the Internet abyss for so long. And you know what they say about what happens when you gaze long into an abyss: it makes you a fag.
 
Last edited:
Just out of interest, what was Gaiman’s take on Warren Ellis?
Couldn't find anything. I suspect given what happened with Warren he wisely recognised it would bite him in the ass down the line if he opened his mouth.
In any case, Neil was nice enough to me, he could have easily refused or ignored it entirely, and that gave me a feeling that he's at least partially a good person.
But he's also a tremendously annoying proggy, and that mean he's at least partially a bad person.
Worth knowing. I suspect he is like most people, capable of acts of kindness especially when they cost him little and indeed would likely not even consider them an act of kindness. But also capable of abusing what they have to get what they want as might be the case here. Given most transactions require the consent of both parties I am loathe to call him a bad person because of that.

But, by the standards of those he aligns himself with, he is a rapist. By the standards Netflix works by Sandman should be cancelled immediately, with all those diverse actors cast to the wind. However I suspect it will go like the recent Flash film where it just is expected to be ignored. And once more those high moral standards are shown to be double ones and we all are worse off as a result.

Happily for me I can separate art from artist.
 
Gaiman's writing is pretty good... if you're fourteen. Some of his stuff, like American Gods, was only at its best in the context of the turn of the millennium. Coraline is a better movie than a book, and Sandman goes nowhere fast. He's entirely propped up by Hot Topic Adults and I'm tired of pretending otherwise.
 
Are they redheads? Was he taking out his frustration over Tori Amos's rejection and Amanda Palmer leaving him? Idiot is rich and famous, he should know better than to "cuddle and make out with" the help. They will let you grab them by the pussy, but you shouldn't.

lol Tori Amos. I was a fan of her for a time, but her career jumped the shark in 1999 and her music has been pretty embarrassing ever since (save for "A Sorta Fairytale"-- the last good song she made).

A lot of her old songs reference Neil Gaiman, has been an outspoken "bff" to him for decades now, and she is one of the co-founders of RAINN.

Oof!
 
Back