Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
Can we not post pedophile rabbits in this thread, thanks.
AHEM
Tard9.png

She's there for a reason.

(Also updated version of the poster for those who know)
 
Aaron's case number for his order is 71-CV-24-1. The timing should be almost exactly the same (very start of 2024, based on the trailing 1 and 2) but the counties are different, 73 is Stearns (St. Cloud) and 71 is neighboring Sheburne County.
It didn't yield any more info on this case but apparently Stearns county has a separate search than the state. Might be useful at some point.

 
Very weird response from the children. Sounds to me like they may have been coached.
I refuse to believe a teenager wouldn't at least have some idea of what was happening.

I think the oldest is currently 16, and the second oldest is about 14. At 16 and 14, they are old enough to "know better" and have enough independence to go rogue against their parents' orders. But they are definitely still young enough to fall victim to manipulation from their parents.
 
So the older children say they did not know there were drugs. Very interesting.
Very weird response from the children. Sounds to me like they may have been coached.
They didn't know there were drugs but the older children "confirmed" that if any of the children tested positive it was because of all the people on drugs in the home. Makes sense.

Also the "confirmed" in that sentence makes it sound like it was the person interviewing them who gave them a leading question.
 
That stream was pretty unbelievable.

That was literally watching a fat retarded man slur words at a perverted middle-aged tweaker.
The @elb cut was enough for me. Fucking hell, man.
Nick should just read his thread on the stream and make any corrections he needs to live.
It's on one of his bingo cards so it's bound to happen at some point.
 
View attachment 6152375
So the older children say they did not know there were drugs. Very interesting.
Either they never left their rooms and ignored literally everything naively, or they are liars. Drug addicts are not good at acting sober nor are they smart when it comes to hiding drugs. 100% guarantee that they are lying for their parents because they don't want them to get into as much trouble.
 
They didn't know there were drugs but the older children "confirmed" that if any of the children tested positive it was because of all the people on drugs in the home. Makes sense.
It would make sense if the test was for the actual drug, and not drug metabolites. Which is, oddly enough, exactly the mistake nick made when claimed his kids might have got lightly powdered with Colombian marching powder just by being in the house (which still isn't a win scenario, but whatever).
 
This is absolutely kino. Every time Nick starts telling a lie, his voice starts wigging out robotically. Robocrack can be seen between 2 minutes 30 seconds and 4 minutes and then again around 8 minutes. Who the hell am I kidding, the entire thing is completely fucked. Ralph blew the interview of his career due to his horrific Mexican internet:

https://rumble.com/v55cerd-killstream-exclusive-the-nick-rekieta-interview-5pm-est.html

:story::suffering::story:
 
He also appears to have implicitly confirmed that the May 16, 2024 document had nothing to do with the report from the pastor, since that clearly did not get "screened out as not sufficient and ignored".


View attachment 6151242
This would be consistent my reading of the the documents posted in the past month which was that they weren't informed of the situation (and thus, likely, of the report from the pastor which precipitated the events) until after the search was about to get underway.

View attachment 6151232
In my state, as a mandatory reporter, I am required to make 2 reports. One to CPS and one to LE. I don't get to pick. The 5/16 date is the same date that LE said they were contacted by the pastor in their warrant application. The pastor called both CPS and the Sheriffs office on 5/16 and filed reports. Nick saying that the 5/16 was dismissed obtusely leaves out that 5/16 is what led directly to the investigation by police and his 5/23 arrest.
 
The 5/16 date is the same date that LE said they were contacted by the pastor in their warrant application. The pastor called both CPS and the Sheriffs office on 5/16 and filed reports.
It doesn't say 5.16.

It says 5/15, the day before the report that resulted in the warrant was made by the pastor.

From the images posted by @MNPublicRecords2:
document.png

In my state, as a mandatory reporter, I am required to make 2 reports.
Okay... That's not relevant if you're not in Minnesota though?
 
Last edited:
Back