Outdoor Recreation Isn’t Free – Why We Need to Stop Pretending It Is

When I spent a summer as a river guide, I met three people who’d abandoned their homes to live on the Rio Grande.

One lived out of a bus, another in a tent, and the last in his station wagon. They spent their days off rafting, kayaking, and hiking.

None of these men seemed to have much money.

They’d managed to live the dirtbag lifestyle many nature lovers dream of, leaving modern conveniences behind to pursue their passion: being outside. It’s easy to think that if these guys could make an outdoorsy life work, anybody could.

Unlike going to the movies, eating at a restaurant, or other “luxuries,” spending time in nature seems free. But not everyone has equal access.

As with travel, marginalized groups face a lot of barriers to outdoor recreation. This leaves the different types of outdoor fun to privileged folks.

Take race, for one. A 2016 study shows more than three in four US young adults who participate in outdoor activities are white. Nearly 80% of National Park visitors are, too.

In fact, I’m white. So were most of the people I raft-guided with.

I’ve built trails, sprayed noxious weeds, and cleaned up camping sites with a ton of white people over four seasons with the US Forest Service and a state park.

Like a lot of white people, I learned to ignore the whiteness of myself and other outdoor enthusiasts around me. I didn’t hear backpackers saying overtly racist things or see jerks physically blocking people of color from the trails, so I paid the homogeneity no mind.

It’s easy to overlook inequality when it’s systemic. It’s even easier when we benefit.

Ambreen Tariq runs Brown People Camping, an Instagram account that promotes diversity in public lands. She says she can feel like an outsider hiking and camping as a Muslim woman of color and immigrant.

“I felt like I had to establish myself – ‘Yeah, I’m a camper, I’m a hiker’ – that other people don’t do as much because they don’t have to question their belonging in that space,” Tariq tells Outside.

“Not only did I not have an authentic background doing activities in the outdoors, but my family didn’t do it, and I don’t have the legacy of being connected to a piece of land because we were always moving.”

We need to acknowledge outdoor recreation’s lack of diversity and inclusion.

Without understanding what’s keeping folks home, we blame oppressed individuals for “not taking initiative,” rather than addressing what may be preventing them from participating in certain activities.

To encourage people to take their own adventures, we might say well-meaning things like, “Anybody can do this if they’re motivated enough.”

This can be inspirational to someone who has the resources and leisurely time to explore the outdoors and needs a kick in the butt to do so. However, the message can be draining for folks who are raring to explore, but can’t.

We forget that society’s hierarchies of race, gender identity, sexual orientation, body size, and economic class don’t magically disappear in the forest. We deny that society actively discourages millions from playing outside, possibly stopping budding conservation activists.

As Tariq notes, “The more of us who can connect to it, the more we can protect it together.”

Here are a few barriers that marginalize people have to overcome to experience nature.

1. You Need Equipment

Our society treats nature as something we can enjoy independent of capitalism.

Theoretically, we go there to escape, and all we need are some sturdy shoes and maybe a sleeping bag.

The reality is more complicated. In the United States, outdoor recreation is a $646 billion industry. Open the pages of outdoor magazines, and you’ll find $150 trail running shoes, $500 tents and $4,000 mountain bikes.

We’ve created a culture of elitism around the outdoors, led by wealthy gear heads.

The Minnesota Land Trust’s Hansi Johnson, who’s white, recalls how he used to see people wearing jeans and flannel cross-country skiing growing up – a rare sight today.

Even if folks push past mainstream narratives and seek more affordable gear, cost is still a factor for low-income people.

If deals on used equipment or borrowing from a friend aren’t feasible in someone’s area, gear for a no-frills camping trip can still cost $500. Forget the cost of a car and gas to get to the campsite.

While do-it-yourself fixes for gear do exist – anybody else try cooking on a beer can camp stove? – they’re not universally known outside of backpacking circles. Ditto on cheap gear websites.

Those who make outdoor activities cheap often have a support system behind them.

As a freelancer with a college education, I’m perpetually broke, not poor. I couldn’t camp comfortably if I didn’t have the gear my parents gifted me back in high school.

No wonder 40% of participants in outdoor activities make $75,000-plus salaries a year.

The paradox that being poor is expensive is true: If you want to participate in a no-cost outdoor activity, you need to have money to invest in the gear initially.

This system reveals deeply entrenched classism. Ignoring it isn’t going to make it go away.

2. Outdoor Gear Doesn’t Fit Everyone

Cost is just one hurdle. Outdoor gear needs to fit.

Fitness culture overall reeks of fat-shaming, for one, which is reflected in workout clothing offerings.

Ultra-marathoner and cross-country coach Mirna Valerio says on Fat Girl Running that she struggles to find functional, flattering outfits that don’t pinch or cost a lot. In fact, most sportswear goes up to just a size twelve.

For those who’d prefer cycling: Only last year did anyone think to build a bike for someone who’s heavier than 300 pounds.

As with disability access, if the equipment isn’t readily available, people aren’t as likely to think that the outdoors are theirs to explore.

If we truly believe that everyone should be outside, we need to hold companies accountable for their limited views on body size.

3. Access to Natural Spaces Is Tangled in Historic Privilege and Oppression

In principle, public lands belong to all of us. In reality, select people get to enjoy it.

Carolyn Finney, geographer and author of Black Faces, White Spaces, explains about how national parks contribute to a larger story about who we are as a country, which historically excludes Black folks.

On Tavis Smiley, a PBS show hosted by Tavis Smiley, Finney reminds us that people of color do have a connection to natural spaces, but some of that land was stolen from them:

” …whether it’s the 400,000 acres of land that were originally given to freed enslaved Africans and then taken away, whether it’s all the native people that had to be removed from land in order for the Homestead Act to make sense, and then give it to European immigrants so that they could have their own plot of land.”
Finney continues, “This is part of the legacy of who we are and our issues of land and ownership and connection.”

Today, 80% of communities of color live “in areas where the proportion of remaining natural area is lower than the state average.” According to a study in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, low-income neighborhoods are four and a half times less likely to have recreation facilities like parks in some states.

Furthermore, what we consider “untouched wilderness” is anything but.

As Kimberly Fanshier notes for Everyday Feminism, this concept centers around white people’s perspective and erases Indigenous populations who lived there for centuries before.

Many national parks and public lands were built on colonized lands. Even US National Parks reflect colonialism, where white leaders ignored Indigenous people in the area to establish.

Our society leverages natural spaces as a tool for capitalism and colonialism, while at the same time touted them as apolitical, free, and pure.

This erases our culpability for upholding the current system.

4. You Need to Know That Outdoor Recreation Is an Option

Families pass down their love for hours spent in the woods, including mine. It can be hard to try a new sport without that preexisting support.

Media paint a homogenous picture of who enjoys the outdoors, as well. They’re typically white, male, cisgender, slender, able-bodied, and assumed straight. Lore about Daniel Boone and mountain men perpetuate this image.

As Tariq notes to Outside, “It’s hard to see yourself in the outdoor community if you don’t physically see others like you, and you definitely aren’t seeing it in advertising.”

Other barriers stand in the way of people’s motivation to go outside.

For example, society doesn’t socialize women and femmes to be physically strong like it does with men. This reflects toxic binary expectations we have about gender that need to be changed.

I’ve had several close friends who’ve said their families actively discouraged them from playing outside growing up.

They had to move to a state with a more outdoor-focused culture to learn that, yes, they could rappel into caves and bushwhack through the wilderness with a full pack.

5. The Day-to-Day Culture Around Outdoor Recreation Is Exclusive

Society’s hierarchies don’t disappear at city limits.

Even when folks manage to go out and climb rocks, kayak a river, or bike down a mountain, people are still subject to unfair stereotyping and microaggressions.

Think of a group of women professors who went to Yosemite a few years ago. A handful of them write in Al Jazeera how park staff waved through those who were white and Latinx, but questioned all four Black professors at length.

They write:

“One of the Black professors was questioned about her college degrees, the title of her research project, and her university affiliation, and was asked to provide a faculty ID. The agents appeared incapable of imagining that a Black woman could hold a PhD and visit a research station for a scholarly event…This is heartbreaking, not least because Buffalo Soldiers, members of all-African-American regiments of the US Army, were among the nation’s first park rangers and built the first marked trail at Yosemite. Today only one percent of the park’s visitors are Black.”
On top of racism, rape culture persists.

Many outdoor jobs, like wildland firefighting and logging, remain hyper-masculine and painfully heteronormative.

The Department of Interior found evidence last year “of a long-term pattern of sexual harassment and hostile work environment” in the Grand Canyon’s River District. Female workers with agencies like the Forest Service across the country have revealed similar grievances.

***

The barriers to outdoor recreation are very real, and as with most things, marginalized folks suffer the most.

For those of us who manage to get outside, we need to go beyond calling ourselves lucky. We need to understand ourselves as privileged.

Nature doesn’t have to be a rich, white playground.

However, structures humans put in place – capitalism, colonialism, racism, sexism, and ableism – allow some people to access the outdoors and force others home.

Groups like Outdoor Afro, The Trail Posse, Brothers of Climbing, and the Venture Out Project are already doing heavy lifting to include people of color, queer folks, and others. We need to follow their lead.

We also need to celebrate marginalized people who enjoy the outdoors in their own way.

As Finney notes, we don’t hear enough about Black people’s stories. Consider the late conservationist John Francis who walked across the US and took a vow of silence for seventeen years to promote environmental stewardship.

There are histories that are rendered invisible as Finney points out:

“So part of it is the people who are in the position of power in terms of deciding what the ‘correct’ relationship to have to the natural environment can’t see us there doing the things that we do, whether we’re having barbecues, or we’re fishing, or we’re just hanging out doing whatever it is we do. We’re often not seen even though we’ve always been there.”
Tariq talks about how she’s gotten backlash for car-camping as “cheating.” Let’s acknowledge that there’s no single, right way to camp and the notion that there is, is part of the problem.

My favorite memories are outside.

I remember skating on a black, ice-covered lake for miles. Eating marshmallows on a ridge at midnight with my sister. Sleeping under the stars on a beach after a day rafting the Snake River.

Let’s work harder to fight inequity, so everyone can enjoy that privilege.

 
I'm someone that spends any chance I can ether going for a local walk, spending time in forest or finding a dirt road to dispense cam near some river and lake. Or high country backpacking. This was written by someone out of touch living in Denver. You don't need money to spend outside, my boots were found for 5$ at used store and I treated them with some waterproofing and bug proofing for 20 more$ While it may be easier for me because I live in a part of the country with open space more then people, you can still find a local state park easily.

“I felt like I had to establish myself – ‘Yeah, I’m a camper, I’m a hiker’ – that other people don’t do as much because they don’t have to question their belonging in that space,” Tariq tells Outside.

“Not only did I not have an authentic background doing activities in the outdoors, but my family didn’t do it, and I don’t have the legacy of being connected to a piece of land because we were always moving.”

No you don't need to establish yourself , you should be by yourself and quiet. This why National parks are horrible mess right now and feel like Disneyland. I avoid visiting them at any chance but I made the mistake of visiting Zion National park a year ago. It was overran by people making tik-tok and Instagram users glued to there phones and not actual enjoying the space. I was taking a road trip and stopped by a roadside area to have a picnic break by a river. Nothing special about the spot and dozens of others someone could stop and do the same. A women came running down the hillside( almost killing herself) and squatted by my picnic to take selfies with the food. Then ran around like a headless chicken taking 100s of photos in span of 5 mins without actual stopping to hear the water.
 
Shittons of black people have been in the US Army, including black women. They've been on military hikes, lived in tents, etc. So if they wanted to camp, fish and hunt after they left the army, you'd see them out there.

But even former military blacks don't want to spend their free time and spare cash on that shit. Let them go.
The apartments are part of a program for single moms dealing with drug addiction. There was a little library installed too.
LMAO, a library for the drug addict single moms and their crackbabies!
Peak Mel Brooks couldn't write parody that lulzy.
They'd rather be loud in their cars or apartments, they simply can't be anywhere quiet
Blacks are earsplittingly loud, always and everywhere. Have you ever been on an airplane with a bunch of blacks? The constant noise is unbelievable.

I have many reasons to hate living around blacks, but the never ending pointless noise might be worse than the crime.
 
Many outdoor jobs, like wildland firefighting and logging, remain hyper-masculine and painfully heteronormative
Can someone explain this faggot the nature of these jobs is hyper masculine because they require upper body strength which men have it in spades. Sir i would recommend to retake your elementary school biology class specifically the lessons about human biology and physical gender differences.

Also lol you didn't ask mo money for dem programs . Are you broken nigga or you forgot to push in that shit in your article?
 
That's funny, the state park I was in over the 4th was lousy with browns...oh wait, no, they were poos and spics, and the blacks I thought I saw were probably just really dark/mixed spics.

Frankly I wish outdoorsy stuff was as 'exclusive' as this chucklefuck is implying because then maybe the parks would be frequented by people capable of respecting the places and the facilities available.
 
That actually sounds kind of cool, too bad the pay is shit.
We also need to celebrate marginalized people who enjoy the outdoors in their own way.
No, niggers and their like need to go back to the cities and fuck off. Before covid I barely saw any in state parks. Post covid I see niggers of all sorts hooting, hollering, and doing stuff like riding bikes on no bike trails. Go back to your hives and suffer, stop ruining it for everyone else.
 
Weird how nigs don't do x always translates to nigs can't do x (because of white people) for these dipshits.
1. You Need Equipment
Do you own or can you acquire a tarp (optional, in case of rain), a cigarette lighter, and a blanket? That's the baseline for summer camping as far as I can tell. And as you might expect this was written by an upper middle class fashion reporter who probably thinks camping is icky because she might sweat and the ground is literally made of dirt.
 
aMxzQDx_460s.jpg

no, in all seriousness tho, i go backpacking, hiking, kayaking frequently. i see non white people a lot, its usually in national parks, i really only see white people in federal wilderness. overall, i dont think ive ever seen a black person while doing any of those activities.

i just dont think they are connected to nature as much. from an individualistic standpoint sure its possible. splenger said culture isnt directly tied to race, in regards to the faustian spirit, african americans are westernized to such a degree that i see them as more hyper materialistic than white people, they simply are not curious about the unkown and dont care to push any kind of boundary. they just care for material gain.

the economy is fuckin shit but if i were black and cared about backpacking itd be fairly cheap to buy a 20L backpack, some cheap hiking shoes, and $40 bucks of gas for my leased car to drive out of the city to a state park.

everyone has a smart phone and maps on avenza are rarely over $5.
 
Last edited:
as someone who camps and hikes a lot, ill give my two cents on this.

, gear for a no-frills camping trip can still cost $500.
no it is not. if you are just going to a developed campsite the only thing you really need is a cheap tent form walmart and a blanket. and every homless person now seems to be able to afford a tent to put in a park, so you have no excuses here.

We deny that society actively discourages millions from playing outside

nope, society does not tell darkie they cant play outside. these are just your delusions stalker child.

We need to acknowledge outdoor recreation’s lack of diversity and inclusion.

i think it is a good thing. i have never once feared that my camping equipment would be stolen or my car broken into when im out hiking and i leave my stuff behind. you bring in more darkies to camping and i 100% guarantee you the rates of theft at campsites will go up.

i also enjoy peace and quiet. the few black people i have seen out on the trails or camping have 100% all played shitty music form shitty Bluetooth speakers. why are black people incapable of not playing loud rap music everywhere they go? can they not just let the rest of us enjoy nature? they also talk loud as humanly possible at all times. again this makes it difficult for the rest of us to enjoy nature.

i also enjoy not having the parks covered in litter. if you have never lived about blacks you may not realize they liter more than anybody else i have seen. it is unreal how they will just throw chip bags and empty soda can on the ground when they are done with them, even when there is a garbage can 5 feet in front of them.

one of the things which makes nature nice is that white people respect nature, blacks do not.

Many national parks and public lands were built on colonized lands. Even US National Parks reflect colonialism

very contradictory tone here. if they are colonized land then why do you want darkies to use them more? wouldn't you think using them is engaging in and benefiting from the colonization?

where white leaders ignored Indigenous people in the area to establish.

and white people have done much more beneficial things with them than the red man ever did.

assumed straight

when 90% of the population is straight, then it is a safe assumption, especially when it is a family or heterosexual couple in the advertisement.

It’s hard to see yourself in the outdoor community if you don’t physically see others like you

why do every single darkie now do this? they complain that if they dont constantly see other darkies in movies, tv shows, or whatever then they just dont belong? why do they constantly need to be told and shown black people doing something before they think they can do it?

Or like EVERY major Indian tribe in America before whitey showed up and "stole their land". They all land-raided, slave-raided and genocided each other until only the strong tribes had any land to speak of.

this is something which annoys me, the whitewashing of how much every indian crying about stolen land is crying about land their tribe stole form another tribe, but it's is different when they do it. the red man had 0 problems at all with killing and taking land before the white man came. it is only after the white man was way more successful at it did they cry about it. honestly i hate to say it but it comes off as sore loser mentality.

The overwhelming whiteness of the wilderness is a selling point.

exactly. see my point above. white people are why nature is nice. you introduce blacks to it and you introduce all the tings which makes them unpleasant.

White people enjoy some activities more than certain other broadly-defined groups of people.

This is a problem somehow.

Also, hiking/camping culture is just as big, if not bigger in Japan and Taiwan so it's not just white people.

exactly, i have seen tons of asians out in the national parks. i have seen more asians out hiking than at any other point in my life. outside of hiking i see maybe one or two here or there, but go to a state or national park and you'll run into a group of them.

id say this article is written form abiased black centric point of view. the author never once considered the view point of an asian. they need to check their privilege.
 
View attachment 6162415

no, in all seriousness tho, i go backpacking, hiking, kayaking frequently. i see non white people a lot, its usually in national parks, i really only see white people in federal wilderness. overall, i dont think ive ever seen a black person while doing any of those activities.

i just dont think they are connected to nature as much. from an individualistic standpoint sure its possible. splenger said culture isnt directly tied to race, in regards to the faustian spirit, african americans are westernized to such a degree that i see them as more hyper materialistic than white people, they simply are not curious about the unkown and dont care to push any kind of boundary. they just care for material gain.

the economy is fuckin shit but if i were black and cared about backpacking itd be fairly cheap to buy a 20L backpack, some cheap hiking shoes, and $40 bucks of gas for my leased car to drive out of the city to a state park.

everyone has a smart phone and maps on avenza are rarely over $5.

My thoughts exactly. I dont think this author has actually spent time around black people because if she did, she would know they are mystified as to why white people like the outdoors, extreme sports, wilderness, etc etc. They think those are foolish white people activities and they have no interest.
 
Oh good, the National Trust's stupid "the outdoors is inherently racist" nonsense American style.

Touch. Grass.
But how racist is that grass?

Edit:
Blacks are thoroughly urbanized. Muh marginalized groups, fuck outta here. There was an episode of that show Alone with a nog who didn't even make it a full day. Hadn't set up a shelter, hadn't done shit. Tapped out because he heard an animal of some sort and it spooked him.

Centuries. As in, a long fucking time ago. As in, not anymore. Cope and seethe.
He was bragging about how he was going to kill a bear, then got spooked by the idea of fighting said bear.
 
Quick, someone tell them that their "free" welfare money isn't free either and that a white person had to give up a non-insignificant portion of their income to pay for it.
they wouldn't care. in fact, i have heard from one of the more "white" black people(ie one who has gone to college, stayed out of jail, and tries to live a normal life) confided that most blacks see it as a form of reparations. they think they are owed welfare and it is good that white people have to pay taxes to support it.

so they already know white people pay for it and are glad about it.
 
When I spent a summer as a river guide, I met three people who’d abandoned their homes to live on the Rio Grande.

One lived out of a bus, another in a tent, and the last in his station wagon. They spent their days off rafting, kayaking, and hiking.

None of these men seemed to have much money.

Lol who fuckin' asked?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neo-Nazi Rich Evans
Back