Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 30.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 86 32.5%

  • Total voters
    265
From what I can gather, in order to cooperate with CPS, and to fulfill the required actions he has to provide CPS with information and access to the home.

However, anything told to CPS could also be used in his criminal case. Therefore, cooperating with the action plan could be tantamount to pleading guilty, or it could harm their defence.

None of that is likely to be true. The more likely situation is that Nick is dealing with the CPS process by utterly denying that there was ever neglect in the home or that he was a user of cocaine. That he is reacting to anything in the CPS process that attempts to get him to address his drug problem or the problems in the home as a confession of guilt.

The nature of the family court process is that to make progress getting the children back, you have to be able to admit to and deal with the problems that led to the children being taken away in the first place. If Nick insists that nobody had a drug problem, that nobody used drugs in the house and that CPS is committing perjury under oath in family court against him (implying that he refuses to accept that the children were ever neglected), then he isn't going to make any progress toward getting those kids back.

And as well, even if he beats all the criminal charges in the case, even then CPS isn't going to just forget everything that happened and assume he & wife are great parents. Because even if he beats a criminal charge, he is still a guy who had massive amounts of coke in his house and a very young child who was using large amounts of cocaine. And if Nick really believes that his dirty trap-house was a great place for his kids and that he was a great parent, in the name of protecting the kids he would under no circumstances get them back.

And while Nick may believe he can mount a successful jury trial defense around saying that the 26 grams of coke in his bedroom were not his and that he bears no responsibility for his eight year old daughter having used cocaine, the family court is not required to enable or share those sort of delusions.

The Nick who is claiming that CPS wants him to incriminate himself is the name Nick who rants and raves about how the state is conspiring against him, how CPS is lying under oath in his case and how he has secret information that only HE knows that will completely exonerate him in the case. That if only he could testify without danger of self-incrimination, he could prove that CPS has lied under oath about his family. That all the evidence against him can't be trusted because he knows a truth that we don't and only what he himself says can be trusted.

In summary, if he acts like a lunatic and uses the defense strategy of a crazy person in his case, the price of doing that is that will not get his kids back anytime soon and that is probably a very good thing.
 
Last edited:
This whole turning on Aaron thing seems strange to me. Like all these people suddenly just NOW realized he's a piece of shit? Not buying it.. Two weeks ago it was alleged that Nick was the one writing April's texts, now the same person who said that flips the script because of April's text? This seems like a coordinated effort to establish a narrative. A bit of RACKETEERING, if you will.
 
Like all these people suddenly just NOW realized he's a piece of shit?
The narrative is that they disliked him for a while but were pitying him too much to turn earlier, before headbutting document was out.



Edit: the word she is looking for is a doormat.
 
Based on how it looks, it's probably a bug bite that he scratched or an ingrown hair. It could also be a related to his heat allergy (which is almost certainly real, considering he mentioned it more than once during or before kick vic, so it predates his downward spiral by years). Hives caused by heat sometimes look like nasty little pimples, which can get irritated and turn into sores when scratched/picked at.
That's one massive bite that he scratched. No one can make a conclusion from his shitty potato camera ($10k Sony including lens by the way) footage. Cocaine can cause a range of skin irritations and disorders, many will look like that. It can cause skin vasculitis.

If you're going with the bite thing, he got bit by something pretty nasty so good riddance. Hope it's from the bugs inhabiting one of the skunks or racoons he snuffed.
 
It's not really a Rekieta W. It's just an Aaron L, and it's not even a revealing one. I could've told you all four of those points after watching Aaron talk for a couple minutes. He's a creepy loser who gives off a feeling that's somewhere between "that one teacher that nobody liked" and "guy who fantasizes about committing a mass shooting but is too cowardly to do it". I have no idea how he managed to marry April, because even stupid women will instinctively stay away from guys like Aaron.

If anything, having invited someone like that into his home is a massive Rekieta L, because you can get a feel for someone like Aaron almost immediately, and he's not worth having around (even if it's just to fuck his wife).
The thing is, even though this is an Aaron L, the narcissistic shitbag that is Balldo Boy will still take it as a W for him & break every smug detector within 100 miles. And much enjoyment will be had by all here... 😁
 
They’re all horrible confirmed

Lock Nick, Kayla, April and Arron up and throw away the key. Everyone should just forget these foul humans exist.

I would also include keanu and geno in the list of horrible people. They are literally just Aaron and April one step up on the (now former) anthony cumia/compound media ratpile. They are all bad people.

Its also worth a caution that alot of the drama between them & Aaron is more about the demise of compound media than anything to do with Nick. All the rats are trying to establish their places in the new hierarchy and inter-rat warfare was inevitable. The hierarchy is suddenly not so fixed anymore and none of these people were ever friends in the first place.
 
I just listened to Aaron cry and cope live about Keanu and Geno. The funniest part was that he monologued for like 20 minutes straight and finally his co-host said matter-of-factly, “I have no idea what we’re talking about here.” Aaron assumed he and everyone else was up all night watching Keanu clips, I guess.

Aaron got super scummy and read a private letter his 10-year-old daughter wrote him. These types always go all out to make themselves look like fathers who are adored by their kids (and therefore MUST be good guys!).

He also mentioned twice in five seconds that he’d bought Geno and Keanu “a beautiful gift” for their impending marriage. Pathetic.
 
The problem with this is drug laws are like gun laws. Responsible, law abiding citizens -- the sort of people who wouldn't hurt others anyway -- are the only people who obey them.
Yeah about that…

I’m not going to admit to anything illegal but I can assure you unless there’s a metal detector I’m carrying
 
So it was all Aaron/April's cocaine and Nick didn't even know about it despite it being in his safe and his nose and his child,
I think if you showed the Anime Sucks Cope And Sneed clip to a jury you could make a compelling argument that a man that fucking spasticated on booze could have coke in his house, child and system and be none-the-wiser.

Glowies could be waging a second Waco on the Rekieta Ranch and Nick would still be in the Balldo Bunker trying to get through that superchat.
 
The Nick who is claiming that CPS wants him to incriminate himself is the name Nick who rants and raves about how the state is conspiring against him, how CPS is lying under oath in his case and how he has secret information that only HE knows that will completely exonerate him in the case. That if only he could testify without danger of self-incrimination, he could prove that CPS has lied under oath about his family. That all the evidence against him can't be trusted because he knows a truth that we don't and only what he himself says can be trusted.

In summary, if he acts like a lunatic and uses the defense strategy of a crazy person in his case, the price of doing that is that will not get his kids back anytime soon and that is probably a very good thing.

He also sounds exactly like any other neglectful addict who's been caught red-handed. I realize he thinks his case is special and unique, but he sounds just like all the other drug-abusing parents who end up entangled with CPS and the court system. Even the meth addicts from the trailer park are weeping and wailing about how they were framed by CPS, and Nick sounds no different. He has more money and more reach, sure, but the story he's telling is a variation on exactly the same thing. Normal people-- like jurors-- who aren't caught up in his self-aggrandizing mythos aren't going to believe any of this. His inability to see himself as others see him-- you might even say his inability to read social cues-- is really hurting him here.

If he'd spent more time participating in jury trials in his local court system, he'd have a better chance of realizing that his trial isn't going to be one of the celebrity affairs that he covers. It's going to be a local judge and twelve local citizens who are likely all really sick of opening up the newspaper and seeing today's fresh story about parents who chose drugs and partying over kids. It's not a unique situation, and everyone but Nick realizes that.
 
I recently discussed the proposition that CPS can use his statements or (in)actions against him in the criminal case with an MSW friend who has worked in the system for years. While technically true, there are several actions Nick/Kayla could take that would demonstrate good faith, and potentially get his kids back sooner, which would not negatively affect his criminal trial, including but not limited to:
  • Attending an intensive outpatient or inpatient drug treatment program. (He's already gotten rid of the bottles in his "office" - no one would use that against him. He's already admitted to abusing alcohol during his shows.) His discussions with medical providers and therapists are generally privileged within such a program.*
  • Not discussing the case publicly, and certainly not putting Ms Sweep on blast.
  • Not allowing April to live in his nearby home - a third party can be considered a danger to the kids. (She shouldn't be using Nick's PO box for her mail. I believe she is doing that, per Aaron, and a court document?)
  • Privating the scores of videos in which his salacious and addictive behavior is on public display. Expressing general regret for how that behavior impacted his life and family.
  • Paying his speeding tickets. Taking a safe driving course.
  • Not streaming from his Mustang - a violation of MN law.
  • Settling the Monty suit.
CPS wants to be able to convincingly argue that the parents are getting their shit together and will not be a danger to their kids. As we know, their goal is family reunification. Arguably, they reunify too often.

Perhaps, as many have argued ITT, he does not want the kids back.

* This is probably what Nick is worried about. The question is whether the upside to completing a program outweighs the downside.
MN Administrative Rules - 5300.0350 CODE OF ETHICS.
1720619247370.png
Edit: Spelling
 
Last edited:
Everything I've heard about the Rekietas would have them enabling Nick and consequently endangering their own grandchildren.
This. It's why during the arrest I specified that I hope they are with Kayla's parents. Luckily it seems like they are at least. This whole thing would be fun to watch if it wasn't for the suffering of kids.
 
While technically true, there are several actions Nick/Kayla could take that would demonstrate good faith, and potentially get his kids back sooner, which would not negatively affect his criminal trial, including but not limited to:
It's not about the kids, it's never going to be about the kids. Nick is obsessed with controlling the narrative to the detriment of anything else. Anyone that doesn't buy his bullshit is a target for his impotent narcissistic rage.
 
Back