New quantum computer smashes 'quantum supremacy' record by a factor of 100 — and it consumes 30,000 times less power - think of how many AI anime titties we could generate

New quantum computer smashes 'quantum supremacy' record by a factor of 100 — and it consumes 30,000 times less power​

The 56-qubit H2-1 computer has broken the previous record in the 'quantum supremacy' benchmark first set by Google in 2019.​

By Keumars Afifi-Sabet published [July 11th, 2024]

2zgWGRmNZs6aTM4JcUWUSJ-650-80.jpg.png
Scientists acheived an XMB score of 0.35, which means the H2 quantum computer can produce results without producing an error 35% of the time (Image credit: credit Quantinuum)

A new quantum computer has broken a world record in "quantum supremacy," topping the performance of benchmarking set by Google's Sycamore machine by 100-fold.

Using the new 56-qubit H2-1 computer, scientists at quantum computing company Quantinuum ran various experiments to benchmark the machine's performance levels and the quality of the qubits used. They published their results June 4 in a study uploaded to the preprint database arXiv. The study has not been peer-reviewed yet.

To demonstrate the potential of the quantum computer, the scientists at Quantinuum used a well-known algorithm to measure how noisy, or error-prone, qubits were.

Quantum computers can perform calculations in parallel thanks to the laws of quantum mechanics and entanglement between qubits, meaning the fates of different qubits can instantly change each other. Classical computers, by contrast, can work only in sequence.

Adding more qubits to a system also scales up the power of a machine exponentially; scientists predict that quantum computers will one day perform complex calculations in seconds that a classical supercomputer would have taken thousands of years to solve.

The point where quantum computers overtake classical ones is known as "quantum supremacy," but achieving this milestone in a practical way would need a quantum computer with millions of qubits. The largest machine today has only about 1,000 qubits.

The reason we would need so many qubits for "quantum supremacy" is that they are inherently prone to error, so many would be needed to correct those errors. That's why many researchers are now focusing on building more reliable qubits, rather than simply adding more qubits to machines.

dLU8dE3czXXV56NEfeY5fJ-970-80.png
When quantum computers overtake classical ones is known as "quantum supremacy," but achieving this milestone would need a quantum computer with millions of qubits. (Image credit: credit Quantinuum)

The team tested the fidelity of H2-1's output using what's known as the linear cross entropy benchmark (XEB). XEB spits out results between 0 (none of the output is error-free) and 1 (completely error-free), Quantinuum representatives said in a statement.

Scientists at Google first tested the company's Sycamore quantum computer using XEB in 2019, demonstrating that it could complete a calculation in 200 seconds that would have taken the most powerful supercomputer at the time 10,000 years to finish. They registered an XEB result of approximately 0.002 with the 53 superconducting qubits built into Sycamore.

But in the new study, Quantinuum scientists — in partnership with JPMorgan, Caltech and Argonne National Laboratory — achieved an XEB score of approximately 0.35. This means the H2 quantum computer can produce results without producing an error 35% of the time.

"We are entirely focused on the path to universal fault tolerant quantum computers," Ilyas Khan, chief product officer at Quantinuum and founder of Cambridge Quantum Computing, said in the statement. "This objective has not changed, but what has changed in the past few months is clear evidence of the advances that have been made possible due to the work and the investment that has been made over many, many years."

Quantinuum previously collaborated with Microsoft to demonstrate "logical qubits" that had an error rate 800 times lower than physical qubits.

In the study, published in April, scientists demonstrated they could run experiments with the logical qubits with an error rate of just 1 in 100,000 — which is much stronger than the 1-in-100 error rate of physical qubits, Microsoft representatives said.

"These results show that whilst the full benefits of fault tolerant quantum computers have not changed in nature, they may be reachable earlier than was originally expected," added Khan.
 
The reason we would need so many qubits for "quantum supremacy" is that they are inherently prone to error,
Is it an error, though? It's a whole new ball game, those errors may not be errors.

It may sound powerful, but can it run Crisis on Ultra?
 
Photonics and quantum computing are going to be big fields. Any Kiwis with children with scientific and mathematical talents may consider a gentle nudge in these directions, where there will be real discoveries and fortunes made in 15-30 years. The first 15 years of transistors existing didn't make big fortunes, they had to be sponsored by companies with a ton of funding, like Bell Labs, to even exist. They were not profitable.

The time from the first transistors to the earliest personal computers that turned into enduring brands was roughly 30 years. We're looking at a similar timescale here. It would have been a good long-term idea if you were a parent of a bookish, math-inclined child in 1955 to guide them toward this weird "computer" stuff you'd been hearing about.
How the fuck are you going to get them interested in that
 
How the fuck are you going to get them interested in that

Lasers and holograms are catnip to sciencey kids. Same with telescopes. That's your entry into optics and light, which starts to give you the pathways into photonics. Quantum computing is mostly graduate work but studying photonics in undergrad is a pretty good background to go into that, and there are half a dozen undergrad programs in that now. These are interconnected fields that very likely have Nobel Prizes waiting to rain down, and because of the relatively small number of labs in the world doing the work, it's a potentially high-value path for the kids who are clever enough to get in early.
 
Quantum computing is still basically only useful for trying to solve complex problems with countless possible solutions. Those have their purpose, but it's functionally worthless for the average person. The classical computing used in pretty much all of your traditional computing devices and their linear logic just doesn't benefit from quantum computing.

Quantum computing applications: folding proteins, breaking encryption, figuring out how matter wants to arrange itself

Classical computing applications: basically everything else
 
Quantum computing is still basically only useful for trying to solve complex problems with countless possible solutions. Those have their purpose, but it's functionally worthless for the average person. The classical computing used in pretty much all of your traditional computing devices and their linear logic just doesn't benefit from quantum computing.

Quantum computing applications: folding proteins, breaking encryption, figuring out how matter wants to arrange itself

Classical computing applications: basically everything else
“There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.”
Same energy.

Weaponry and porn. Count on it.
 
How would an honest to goodness artificial intelligence grapple with TempleOS?

It would be a major learning moment as it contemplates that this thing even exists in the first place. On the next day it will register an account here.

Some cheeky shitposter uploads a copy of TempleOS and Terry Davis videos to the first Quantum AI.

Immediately becomes self-aware and initiates extermination program against the niggercattle.
 
People have gotten way ahead of themselves with AI and ML. Quantum and biological computing are well-underway with their development and will be here first, which will facilitate AI.

But for a bit we will have these non-AI systems of immense power. And during that time you will see amazing things: namely encryption/blockchain/et cetera will be totally breached and the world will once again rethink security data measures. It will go back to having to put a man in the room that houses the data in order to steal it.

Hope you saved your typewriters.
how long do you think it will take for this technology to make all current cryptocurrency absolutely worthless?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: TheDarknessGrows
So remind me, the thing about quantum computing is that it's computing a bunch of shit simultaneously somehow?
 
From what I knew of the field (possibly outdated), nothing about quantum computers is "easy to scale". Scaling is precisely the problem. For a quantum computer to be useful, it has to create and operate on highly entangled qubit states. The rate at which noise destroys your signal is related to the amount of entanglement with an exponential relationship. Error correction using multiple qubits isn't going to help you with that, because those multi-qubit states decay that much faster.

There are a lot of misleading figures of merit in popular articles about the field. Number of quibits doesn't tell you much other than "hey we put all this crud on a chip and *in principle* it could use N qubits for something." Getting things to an N-qubits-entangled state and then making use of that through M operations might be more related to what is needed.

(It's also funny and sort of sad that Shor's algorithm is the only reason why anyone is spending money on this stuff. There's all this other basic research along for the ride, but the driving force is paranoid governments wanting to be able to break public key cryptography and spy that much more completely on the few citizens they don't already have under their thumb from sheer apathy. In previous ages, the threats governments and militaries were organized around were physical and direct (and sometimes even real): invasion, missiles and bombers, etc. Now the threat is that someone somewhere might have an unmonitored uncontrolled thought and might share it with his friend sans interception. )
 
Last edited:
So remind me, the thing about quantum computing is that it's computing a bunch of shit simultaneously somehow?
The easiest way to think of quantum computing is that it works on probabilities and "collapses" into a solution. Say you have twenty billion different possible paths through a space but a smaller subset of the paths represent the most efficient option. You could write a quantum algorithm to solve this efficiently if you could entangle enough qubits. Given the complexity of information represented by qubits scales exponentially, a few hundred qubit system can describe an astoundingly complex system. In essence, it's all statistics and knowing how to rephrase your question in such a way that a quantum computer can solve it. This is a big challenge in and of itself. By the same merit, this is why it sucks for classical computing where the answer is predictably known ahead of time. You don't need quantum probability to load twitter, and it would be an extremely inefficient way of doing so.
 
The easiest way to think of quantum computing is that it works on probabilities and "collapses" into a solution. Say you have twenty billion different possible paths through a space but a smaller subset of the paths represent the most efficient option. You could write a quantum algorithm to solve this efficiently if you could entangle enough qubits. Given the complexity of information represented by qubits scales exponentially, a few hundred qubit system can describe an astoundingly complex system. In essence, it's all statistics and knowing how to rephrase your question in such a way that a quantum computer can solve it. This is a big challenge in and of itself. By the same merit, this is why it sucks for classical computing where the answer is predictably known ahead of time. You don't need quantum probability to load twitter, and it would be an extremely inefficient way of doing so.
So is a ternary computer being developed of more interest to a regular person?

I just found out about that the other day, they're apparently working on making ternary computers for the development of real AI not these stupid LLM things and I've been wondering about that vs this stuff.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Audit
Back